On Sat 08 Oct 2005 07:18:11p, S'mee wrote in rec.food.cooking:
Quoted message said:One time on Usenet said:On Sat 08 Oct 2005 02:34:14p, Dan Abel wrote in rec.food.cooking:
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>,
"Bob (this one)" <[email hidden]> wrote:> So many people have shown Sheldon's lamentable shallowness, general
> ignorance and poisoned mind, that there's no issue about who wins
> and loses in his small, small game. Sheldon loses every time he
> posts. Every time he replies. He demands to lose with his insanity.
> His viciousness. His malice. His utter lack of positive character.You know, Bob, I'm getting a sense that maybe you don't like Sheldon.
:-)
Try reading the Bag o' salad thread, to see a whole different side of
him.Mebbe so, but one side does not necessarily balance or legitimize the
other. Unacceptable behavior is still unacceptable, nonetheless.Would you say that a doctor that saves lives in the hospital but
commits murder out on the street strikes a balance?I'd duck if I were you, Wayne -- I suspect someone's about to lob
the "it's just Usenet" gambit your way...
I'm sure you're right, but I won't be responding to it. :-)
In all fairness, Sheldon has made the very rare postivie response or remark
to me on occasion, but so might a murderer on death row. There is almost
always a tiny slice of nice in the worst of people. That gives me neither
cause nor desire to embrace them.
There is absolutely nothing that anyone could do or say to sway my opinion.
There is no justification...period.
--
Wayne Boatwright *¿*
_____________________________
Popie-In-The-Bowl