J
Jon Senior
Guest
half_pint [email protected] opined the following...
> eh??
The preceding text was an explanation of how to correctly spell and use
the word erroneous. I thought you might find it useful since you failed
to use it correctly in your prior post.
> Well basically yes but I far too modest so say so myself!
Interesting that despite being vastly more intelligent, you have trouble
with simple English grammar. Perhaps you are trying to make us feel at
ease with your deliberate mistakes.
> Yes it is dependent on other factors too but weight is indeed one of them.
Or mass, as is the preferred terminology of most scientists. In the
context of a discussion of "falling due to gravity" the qualification of
"weight" is unnecessary and makes you appear to be ignorant of the
correct terms.
> My opinions are based on facts and are thus facts themselves as I cannot
> lie.
YA George Washington AICMF apples!
> Ah but you idea of reasonable appear to be in contradiction with the
^^^
> laws of physics, which is not particularly surprising considering.
SP: Should read "your".
And when I can apply enough force to cause the cheap plastic brake lever
to bend, yet the brakes are still not powerful enough to lock the
wheels, there is a problem. The problem being that the brakes aren't
good enough. Where you believe there to be a contradiction with physics
in that I do not know.
> > You don't have everyone's best interests at heart?
>
> Did I ever say I had? Please post a link with that quote.
Velvet "I believe everyone that posts here regularly has the best
interests of their fellow riders at heart. But you... y'know, I just
can't put you along side them yet.
Sad, but true."
You: "Yes it sad, but that is the way it is."
Which strongly suggests that you agree with Velvet that it is sad that
you don't have the best interests of your fellow riders at heart. Do
KUATB.
Jon
> eh??
The preceding text was an explanation of how to correctly spell and use
the word erroneous. I thought you might find it useful since you failed
to use it correctly in your prior post.
> Well basically yes but I far too modest so say so myself!
Interesting that despite being vastly more intelligent, you have trouble
with simple English grammar. Perhaps you are trying to make us feel at
ease with your deliberate mistakes.
> Yes it is dependent on other factors too but weight is indeed one of them.
Or mass, as is the preferred terminology of most scientists. In the
context of a discussion of "falling due to gravity" the qualification of
"weight" is unnecessary and makes you appear to be ignorant of the
correct terms.
> My opinions are based on facts and are thus facts themselves as I cannot
> lie.
YA George Washington AICMF apples!
> Ah but you idea of reasonable appear to be in contradiction with the
^^^
> laws of physics, which is not particularly surprising considering.
SP: Should read "your".
And when I can apply enough force to cause the cheap plastic brake lever
to bend, yet the brakes are still not powerful enough to lock the
wheels, there is a problem. The problem being that the brakes aren't
good enough. Where you believe there to be a contradiction with physics
in that I do not know.
> > You don't have everyone's best interests at heart?
>
> Did I ever say I had? Please post a link with that quote.
Velvet "I believe everyone that posts here regularly has the best
interests of their fellow riders at heart. But you... y'know, I just
can't put you along side them yet.
Sad, but true."
You: "Yes it sad, but that is the way it is."
Which strongly suggests that you agree with Velvet that it is sad that
you don't have the best interests of your fellow riders at heart. Do
KUATB.
Jon