I am getting back into road cycling after a few years away, and I am going to purchase a Lemond steel bike -- either the Tourmalet or the Alpe D' Huez. My dealer has clearance pricing on the 2003 models of both right now -- I can get the Tourmalet for $749, and the Alpe D'Huez for $949 -- and has one of each left in my size.
As far as I can tell, the only difference between the two bikes is that the Alpe D' Huez has all 105 components and a carbon fork, while the Tourmalet had a mix of 105 and Tiagra components, and a steel fork.
I'm wondering whether I will see a big difference in the performance of the two bikes such that it is worth it to spend the extra $200 on the Alpe D' Huez. For reference, I'm a pretty big guy -- 6'2, about 260 lbs.
Any opinions, advice, and/or experiences with either bike would be welcome.
As far as I can tell, the only difference between the two bikes is that the Alpe D' Huez has all 105 components and a carbon fork, while the Tourmalet had a mix of 105 and Tiagra components, and a steel fork.
I'm wondering whether I will see a big difference in the performance of the two bikes such that it is worth it to spend the extra $200 on the Alpe D' Huez. For reference, I'm a pretty big guy -- 6'2, about 260 lbs.
Any opinions, advice, and/or experiences with either bike would be welcome.