Shayne Wissler said:"David Damerell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:As far as your ethical ideas on how much is too much go, they are bizzare and totally
wrong-headed.
I wonder if you would care to tell me where I asserted an ethical aspect to this?
I doubt you'd be able to comprehend the connection between "That bike is too much" and "To much,
for what?"
What you mean is that you cannot tell me where I asserted an ethical aspect. No surprise there.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Of course it would, because if you're not a professional racer, that .5-1% change in the overall
weight is not meaningful.
Oh, well thank you God for telling me what my goals in life require. I don't have one those
expensive bikes you deem to be wicked, but supposing I was a very fit rich guy who wanted a
personal best on a particular hill climb,
You'd be a very foolish very fit rich guy, then, since if you got up that hill quicker by buying a
lighter bike, you'd never know if you'd actually improved your physical prowess.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I don't see those with expensive bikes sneering at you about what you deem to be "meaningful".
You just have an envy problem.
Ah, yes, I am envious of people who have something I could buy if I wanted
it. That makes perfect sense.
You're right, it's worse than envy. At least with envy the person recognizes the difference between
good and better. What you have is a case of being mostly unconscious.
Ah, so now you resort to incoherent abuse; unremarkable, since I've shown what nonsense your "envy"
assertion is.
--
David Damerell <[email hidden]> Distortion Field!