Welcome back Guy....
In
news:[email protected], Just zis Guy, you know?
<
[email protected]> typed:
> temporary, and that it was unavoidable. Actually the old firm should have kept CTC's server in
> place for the three days it takes DNS changes to propagate. We pay them for their knowledge of
> cycling, not computers.
That's true - a lot of the problem was the the old firm (who put a bogus "page not found" message on
the site) - but one would have thought that some pressure could have been put by CTC on the former
ISP to at least deliver a page stating the CTC site was being moved and provide details of other
customer contact channels (such as fax, phone, snail mail). It wouldn't have hurt to do that, but I
suppose when they lost the contract they thought "sod CTC"
I appreciate though CTCs core activity isn't IT - but it looks like they needed to be a bit more
assertive with those who *are* providing the technical services to them, or to find people with
technical knowledge
What had also annoyed me more was the number of reports about e-mails not having been answered and
allegations that this was normal for CTC. It may have been a particularly bad time for them, but it
appears that CTC do not seem geared up to dealing with communicating with customers or potential
customers via the Internet!
I was actually considering joining them but had been put off by this débacle. Naturally I was
thinking - what happens if I join and something goes wrong? will I just be ignored? I am however
aware of their history (from reading Richards Bicycle book in its various incarnations) and know of
the good work CTC have done for cycling!
I did think though "I'll wait till Guy is back - he knows the score about CTC
"
Are they planning to improve their customer responsiveness (and sort out the accessibility issue you
mentioned)?
What do you get for the 30 quid?
Alex