"Tony W" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > Where was it?
>
>
> You want me to find it AGAIN?
>
> Googled uk.rec.cycling
>
> Then Googled York Bath Cambridge (this group only)
>
> Whence a certain Simon Mason, resident of Hull, amature radio enthusiast, cyclist and all round
> good guy was found to have posted in
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=york+bath+cambridge++group:uk.rec.cycling&
>
hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=v56ongjdp4al41%40corp.supernews.com&rnum=3
>
> quote/
>
> It's from the 1991 census but here it is:
>
> Districts with the highest and lowest proportions of residents cycling to work Rank District
> Proportion
>
> 1 Cambridge 28.2 2 York 19.0 3 Oxford 17.4 4 Boston 15.5 5 Gosport 15.1 6 Kingston upon Hull 14.1
> 7 Waveney 12.5 8 Crewe & Nantwich 11.9
> 10 Peterborough 11.4 11 Great Grimsby 10.8 12 Hereford 10.7 13 Boothferry 10.6 14 Ryedale 10.4 15
> Norwich 10.3 16 Fenland 10.2 17 South Holland 9.9 18 Barrow-in-Furness 9.7 19 Cheltenham 9.3 20
> Portsmouth 9.2 Source: 1991 Census, ONS
> --
> Simon Mason Anlaby East Yorkshire. 53°44'N 0°26'W
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
>
> /quote
>
Many thanks!
I wonder if that question was asked in the 2001 census. Must check.
It's interesting that Cambridge, York and Oxford came out on top for cycling to work? Do you think
the ONS believes that students work?
Ben
