Food snob?



In article <[email protected]>,
"kilikini" <[email protected]> wrote:
> kids will eat. Personally, I think she's killing her family. Sad thing is,
> all this junk "food" is supported by the government. Yep, you got it, Food
> Stamps. Someone should supervise what kinds of foods people should be
> allowed to buy on government assistance.
>
> kili


I think they should make sure that the recipients are honestly eligible
and then stay the hell out of their grocery carts. Have you ever
offered to help her with meal planning or cooking? Maybe she doesn't
know how.
Sign her up for Dr. Phil's weight loss show.
--
-Barb
<www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 3-17-2006, The $400K Condo in the
'Hood
"If it's not worth doing to excess, it's not worth doing at all."
 
"Melba's Jammin'" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Doug Kanter" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "Henhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:p[email protected]...
>> >A friend of mine accused me of being a food snob the other day. Why?
>> >Because I don't buy processed food, and never go to fast food eateries.
>> >I

> (snippage)
>> > Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else here has suffered a similar
>> > accusation, and had any good arguments with which to refute it? Or
>> > perhaps
>> > you think my friend is right and I'm just too precious about the whole
>> > topic? Opinions welcomed!
>> >
>> > Jo

>>
>> You're normal and your friend's an asshole. Next question.

>
> Oh, pishtosh, Doug! Jo doesn't have assholes for friends. Her friend
> is intimidated and envious and doesn't know how to say so without being
> attacking.


I don't buy it. In my first year of college, my friends and I took about 3
days to realize that if we ate nothing but dorm food, we'd soon be dead. We
did something highly unusual - something we discussed only in hushed tones,
far from strangers: We went out and bought a few cookbooks. Then, we went
out to the park behind the dorm and found some long, thin branches which had
fallen off trees. We used those sticks to open the books from 6-8 feet away,
just in case they exploded or tried to bite us. They didn't. Next, we read
the books. Within a month or two, we had some recipes down pat. Hot plates
and crock pots were illegal, so we had to bribe the R.A. with food, and
promise to unplug everything when finished.

Books. We used books. Not only that, but we were smoking astounding
quantities of pot, and we were STILL able to read the books.
 
In article <[email protected]>,
Siobhan Perricone <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wasn't going to respond to this thread because so many of you are so
> judgemental about the poor, but I couldn't resist this particular post as
> it was a prime example of one of the challenges the poor face in this
> country.
>
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:31:01 GMT, Someone wrote:
>
> >I keep trying to
> >tell her that it's the kind of food she's buying that's causing the weight
> >gain, she nods and says "she knows", but she claims that this is all her
> >kids will eat. Personally, I think she's killing her family.

>
> She isn't killing her family, the indifference to fixing the problems that
> create this situation of poverty is. It's more likely that it's easier to
> tell you her kids won't eat good food than it is to explain the real
> situation. The way you said this in the post makes me wonder just how
> gently you're even saying this to her, and if it doesn't just come across
> as something judgemental that embarrasses her and makes her feel like a
> piece of **** failure, instead of actually encouraging her in some way so
> she might actually succeed.
>
> >Sad thing is,
> >all this junk "food" is supported by the government. Yep, you got it, Food
> >Stamps. Someone should supervise what kinds of foods people should be
> >allowed to buy on government assistance.

>
> It is *so* easy to judge people in this situation. Why don't you take some
> time to find out how much in food stamps and other government assistance
> she actually gets, then look at the prices for fresh foods in your local
> supermarket and think about the size of her family and how much it'd cost
> to feed them good, fresh foods every day. Even at the portions you'd
> consider "sensible".
>
> While it is possible to eat better than you described on such a small
> amount of money, it takes a lot of time, effort, and training to do it. It
> is not intuitive, and it is not something that people are taught how to do
> much any more. Also, it is only possible to eat a little better, not a
> great deal better. So eating a little better, with a whole lot more work,
> that it is unlikely anyone has taken the time to show her how to do versus
> spending her time on other things that may appear more productive to her in
> the long run...
>
> An awful lot of the people I know who are on government assistance don't
> have the time, kitchens, cooking implements, or skills to do what would be
> needed to improve their diet. The cost of setting themselves up with the
> necessary things to make a diet of beans and rice palatable is likely
> higher than that they'd save over the course of several months, which, when
> you're living check to check and having to make choices about which bills
> to pay, isn't a very good incentive.
>
> They manage to eat enough to survive so they can work their **** jobs with
> no hope of advancement (or look constantly for work with few skills and
> little hope of finding anything other than soul crushing labour) so maybe
> their kids can have some better chance, but aren't likely to because
> they'll be fat and thus have a much harder time in school, in the office
> place, and out finding jobs. All the while having to carry the stress
> caused by all of this so they can die early and their kids can continue
> this cycle that we as a society make it nearly impossible to break out of.
>
> Lots easier to just judge her as a fat slob sucking off the government teat
> than to actually help her learn a better way. What a great friend you are.
> Oh maybe you're nice to her face, but you're here in public calling her a
> fat, lazy slob who is *refusing* to feed her family well at the expense of
> the tax payers.
>
> Goddess save me from "friends" like you.


Sweet Jesus! Siobbhan!! May I sit by you? It would be a pleasure to
sit at your feet, Lady. Well said!! I salute you.
--
-Barb
<www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 3-17-2006, The $400K Condo in the
'Hood
"If it's not worth doing to excess, it's not worth doing at all."
 
The Ranger wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2006 08:38:21 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The Ranger wrote:
> > > On 18 Mar 2006 08:13:44 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I'd feel so ashamed if I said such things about my
> > > > friend on an ng..
> > > >
> > > You have other reasons for being so ashamed.
> > >

> > ..yeah, sometimes I act like the meal is more important
> > then the person..

>
> ...And sometimes you don't act at all... So many other reasons to hang
> your head.
>
> The Ranger
> --
> "They're all in my kill file, so I don't see the original posts. [..]
> I've got enough mental illness..."
> Marjorie P, am, 2/21/03


huh?
 
On 18 Mar 2006 08:38:21 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The Ranger wrote:
> > On 18 Mar 2006 08:13:44 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I'd feel so ashamed if I said such things about my
> > > friend on an ng..
> > >

> > You have other reasons for being so ashamed.
> >

> ..yeah, sometimes I act like the meal is more important
> then the person..


....And sometimes you don't act at all... So many other reasons to hang
your head.

The Ranger
--
"They're all in my kill file, so I don't see the original posts. [..]
I've got enough mental illness..."
Marjorie P, am, 2/21/03
 
In article <[email protected]>,
Dave Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's scary to see what some people buy. A while ago I was in the
> checkout line at the grocery store behind a big fat lady and her big
> fat daughter. They had a cart full of cases of pop (not diet) potato
> chips chocolate bars, cookies and other snack foods and a small
> amount of prepared food. It is hard not to be judgmental when you
> see two fat slobs like that and the reason why they are both so
> incredibly fat.


It is hard, isn't it? I see it an wonder what it is in their lives that
took them to that state. What misery and unhappiness and sadness and
anger are they treating with high calories and not much nutrition? What
rage within do they stuff down with food? Where did their hope go and
how old were they when it did?
--
-Barb
<www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 3-17-2006, The $400K Condo in the
'Hood
"If it's not worth doing to excess, it's not worth doing at all."
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The weight is an issue. If ya' eat junk you put on the pounds. I don't
> know about the Food Stamps. Can people buy just anything with them?
>
> Michael


Not sure, but food, I think. Comestibles. Not soap, Tampax,
tobacco, laundry detergent, deodorant, or Band-Aids, or toilet paper.
Edible goods.
--
-Barb
<www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 3-17-2006, The $400K Condo in the
'Hood
"If it's not worth doing to excess, it's not worth doing at all."
 
Siobhan Perricone wrote:
> I wasn't going to respond to this thread because so many of you are so
> judgemental about the poor, but I couldn't resist this particular post as
> it was a prime example of one of the challenges the poor face in this
> country.


Siobhan, you are far more judgemental. The consumption of so-called
junk food has very little to do with obesity... just that no one
focuses much on all the skinny melinks who gobble junk foods even more
ferociously than the obese yet remain emaciatedly thin. And there are
plenty of wealthy folks who eat the best foods money can buy, prepared
by professionals under the auspices of dieticians, and yet those are
the most obese of all... just who do you think is supporting all the
grotesquely expensive spas... sure ain't the food stamp toting fatsos.
Economics is not a determinator of obesity. Obesity (like all
physical attributes) is primarily a direct product of genetics and
indirectly buttressed by various psychosis arising from the primary
cause. This is now a proven fact. Some of the genes have already been
isolated, the problem right now is developing treatment. It will
probably be many years yet to complete the research and many more years
to test and approve various treatments. Sociologists have known about
natural selection for a long time now, that people of similar physical
characteristics tend to seek each other out. Naturally their
offspring's genetics will very likely with rare exception mirror their
own... a mere fifty years ago even in the US spouses were far more apt
to be chosen by family elders (who were wiser), not so anymore.
Couple genetics with the fact that in the US there are fewer and fewer
occupations that require physical exertion (everyone wants to drive a
desk), it's no mystery why there's such an explosion of obesity.
Obesity has nothing to do with nutritional ignorance, laziness, or
socio-economics. Across all spectrums, more and more, fat people are
fornicating with more and more fat people, and hardly anyone moves
under their own power anymore, just that simple.

Sheldon
 
Henhouse wrote:
> A friend of mine accused me of being a food snob the other day...


Someone started the "food snob" thread again. :-(

We might as well crosspost this to the cardio group and flood them with
our irritating rightousness for a while. Turn about is fair play.

Regards,
Bob
 
"Henhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
>A friend of mine accused me of being a food snob the other day. Why?
>Because I don't buy processed food, and never go to fast food eateries. I
>also always buy free range chicken and use either eggs from our own free
>range chooks, or bought duck eggs. I also buy organic foods from time to
>time, and try to buy seasonally and locally (being aware of food miles
>etc.) Does this really make me a food snob? I feel quite insulted, to tell
>you the truth - I don't dictate what others should eat, I just make the
>choices I prefer. I enjoy cooking and have the time to spend doing it, plus
>access to great local produce - I'm not sure why this could be seen as
>wrong in some way!
>
> My friend got quite heated about it all, and told me that if I'd got four
> kids and was working full time, I'd soon change my ways and opt for foods
> I could just stick in the microwave (not that she has the four kids etc.,
> just the one 25yr old son). I'm not likely to ever find myself in that
> position, but I imagine that if I had children I'd be even more concerned
> about the foods they were eating than I am about my own. I could be wrong,
> of course!
>
> This is the same friend who is happy to come to dinner at my house, but
> who refuses to return the favour, as she is 'frightened' of cooking for
> me, as I am (allegedly) good at it - LOL! I'd be happy with beans on
> toast, if someone else had cooked it - but that's by the by.
>
> Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else here has suffered a similar
> accusation, and had any good arguments with which to refute it? Or perhaps
> you think my friend is right and I'm just too precious about the whole
> topic? Opinions welcomed!
>
> Jo


This reminds me of a couple I know who have both, at one time or another,
said to me "I eat to live, I don't live to eat..." While they don't actually
point fingers at me and proclaim that I live to eat, this is the
implication.

When I picture someone who "eats to live" I think of someone who had little
choice and who eats whatever is available. These people, on the other hand,
are picky eaters, IMO. They each have a long list of things they won't eat.

When I picture someone who "lives to eat" I picture someone for whom food is
the entire goal. That's not me. I have plenty of other interests, and I can
be quite happy with a simple meal. But I like to cook and I enjoy eating
good food. I like spices and vegetables and ethnic foods, and a wide variety
of things.

What they mean by their statement is that they "sort of" disapprove of the
time and effort I spend cooking. They don't understand the use of spices,
and anything that can't be on the table with 20 minutes or less of effort
isn't worth doing. They don't get the idea that I like to cook as much as
they enjoy whatever hobbies they have that I'm not interested in, and that
for me, cooking isn't a chore, it's enjoyable. And both DH and I enjoy a
well-made meal, and we like different types of foods, ethnic foods, a wide
range of things. We're not picky eaters at all.

But while these folks seem to disapprove of the time I spend in the kitchen
(or the time they imagine I spend in the kitchen -- there are a lot of
fast-cooking dishes that I make that are fresh, tasty, and healthy) when
they come here for dinner, they eat like ravenous wolves. I've seen them
each eat 3-4 large helpings. And every time we're invited over there, I'm
asked to bring a dozen or so fresh buns. Or a loaf of bread. Homemade, of
course.

I'd say that their "Live to eat" comment is like your friend's "Food snob"
comment. You go through time and effort that your friend wouldn't bother
with. If you want to keep this friend, just agree to disagree. If you think
you can (or want to try to) change her opinion, invite her over to cook with
you and whip up something fresh, easy and fast. When she sees that you can
put a meal together in the same time it takes to nuke some nuggets and make
mac 'n cheese, she might be interested. Or not.

Donna
 
Dave Smith wrote:
> sarah bennett wrote:
>
>>> Lots easier to just judge her as a fat slob sucking off the
>>> government teat than to actually help her learn a better way. What
>>> a great friend you are. Oh maybe you're nice to her face, but
>>> you're here in public calling her a fat, lazy slob who is
>>> *refusing* to feed her family well at the expense of the tax payers.
>>>

>>
>> I really try not to be judgemental about this kind of thing, but I've
>> worked as a supermarket cashier and I've seen what people buy, food
>> stamps or not. Now, my own dietary choices probably aren't the most
>> stellar, but the sheer amount of **** people are happy with astounds
>> me.
>>

Amen! Sure, I buy some prepared foods. Jarred pasta sauce is a case in
point if I want a quick pasta meal. I buy a lot of frozen vegetables
because the fresh are either not in season, look crappy or cost waaaay more
than a pound bag of the frozen.

And really, how hard is it for someone who doesn't know how to "cook" to
read the directions on a package of frozen vegetables? Or a package of
pasta and a jar of sauce?
>
> It's scary to see what some people buy. A while ago I was in the
> checkout line at the grocery store behind a big fat lady and her big
> fat daughter. They had a cart full of cases of pop (not diet) potato
> chips chocolate bars, cookies and other snack foods and a small
> amount of prepared food.


Unfortunately, this is true, and it doesn't matter how they are paying for
the items in their cart. Some people just make really poor choices. I like
chips. Fritos, potato chips, like that. But I don't keep bags and bags of
them in the house. If I don't have them I can't eat them.

On the flip side, however, we don't know what people might have in the
freezer, fridge or pantry at home to offset what you see in their carts.

As for what kili said about her friend's buying habits, she knows this woman
pretty well and I know a bit about her from non-rfc conversations. I don't
think the woman doesn't know *how* to do anything or that she doesn't have
room for better food items; it's my impression she just likes to eat junk
and call it dinner. And that's what she's teaching her daughter by
extension.

Jill
 
"D.Currie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> This reminds me of a couple I know who have both, at one time or another,
> said to me "I eat to live, I don't live to eat..."


I wonder what their sex life is like. :-(
 
In article <[email protected]>,
Siobhan Perricone <[email protected]> wrote:

> It is *so* easy to judge people in this situation. Why don't you take some
> time to find out how much in food stamps and other government assistance
> she actually gets, then look at the prices for fresh foods in your local
> supermarket and think about the size of her family and how much it'd cost
> to feed them good, fresh foods every day. Even at the portions you'd
> consider "sensible".


This is patently untrue. We have been on food stamps, for less than
a year, very early in our marriage when we had one child. We still
shopped the ad circulars, still bought fresh ingredients, still cooked
almost all our meals from scratch. We had money left in our account
_every_ month we were on it. We were even able to get "special" foods
occasionally because of it.

We brought cash with us when we wanted to buy something like ice
cream or pop, the first time, and found out that they were actually
included on the food stamps. We were shocked.

There should be limits on what can be bought, and in my mind, they
should allow things like diapers and toilet paper and soap rather than
pop, ice cream, packaged cookies. They have you come in and meet with
them to get them, and for renewals, and they can teach you about
budgeting, nutrition, give recipes, etc there.

Oh, and another thing, they deducted such things as cable bills, long
distance phone bills, cell phone bills, etc, as well as real living
bills like housing, utilities and such, when determining our available
income. We didn't have those things, because we were _poor_, and
thought that would be considered a luxury. We also asked them to reduce
the amount we got, when we found out how much extra we had, to no avail,
and when we were ready to get off had to work really hard to get them to
believe us.

Regards,
Ranee

Remove do not & spam to e-mail me.

"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
http://talesfromthekitchen.blogspot.com/
 
In article <[email protected]>,
Siobhan Perricone <[email protected]> wrote:

> An awful lot of the people I know who are on government assistance don't
> have the time, kitchens, cooking implements, or skills to do what would be
> needed to improve their diet. The cost of setting themselves up with the
> necessary things to make a diet of beans and rice palatable is likely
> higher than that they'd save over the course of several months, which, when
> you're living check to check and having to make choices about which bills
> to pay, isn't a very good incentive.


They don't have a knife, a frying pan and a saucepan? Because that's
all you _really_ need. If they have microwaves to reheat burritos, I
bet they have the others.

Regards,
Ranee

Remove do not & spam to e-mail me.

"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13

http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
http://talesfromthekitchen.blogspot.com/
 
dee wrote:
> The Ranger wrote:
> > On 18 Mar 2006 08:38:21 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > The Ranger wrote:
> > > > On 18 Mar 2006 08:13:44 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I'd feel so ashamed if I said such things about my
> > > > > friend on an ng..
> > > > >
> > > > You have other reasons for being so ashamed.
> > > >
> > > ..yeah, sometimes I act like the meal is more important
> > > then the person..

> >
> > ...And sometimes you don't act at all... So many other reasons to hang
> > your head.
> >
> > The Ranger
> > --
> > "They're all in my kill file, so I don't see the original posts. [..]
> > I've got enough mental illness..."
> > Marjorie P, am, 2/21/03

>
> huh?


Just to clarify, my reply about "the meal more important then the
person" is not sarcastic, it is what I am like sometimes
 
"Melba's Jammin'" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The weight is an issue. If ya' eat junk you put on the pounds. I don't
>> know about the Food Stamps. Can people buy just anything with them?
>>
>> Michael

>
> Not sure, but food, I think. Comestibles. Not soap, Tampax,
> tobacco, laundry detergent, deodorant, or Band-Aids, or toilet paper.
> Edible goods.
> --
> -Barb


I've seen food debit cards used now (looks like credit cards.) I've seen
them used in Big Lots for other things than food. I believe these are from
West Virginia. I won't swear either, but I think so. Also at a clothing
store, Gabriel's, a VERY INEXPENSIVE clothing store, they have a sign that
says that they take this sort of payment, whether it is stamps or debit
cards, I can't remember.
Most of the shoppers seem to be RV-ers, people of ethnic origin and people
like me -- old and a little overweight looking for something comfortable to
wear - cheap.
Dee Dee



Dee Dee
 
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:25:04 -0700, "D.Currie"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>This reminds me of a couple I know who have both, at one time or another,
>said to me "I eat to live, I don't live to eat..." While they don't actually
>point fingers at me and proclaim that I live to eat, this is the
>implication.
>
>When I picture someone who "eats to live" I think of someone who had little
>choice and who eats whatever is available. These people, on the other hand,
>are picky eaters, IMO. They each have a long list of things they won't eat.
>
>When I picture someone who "lives to eat" I picture someone for whom food is
>the entire goal. That's not me. I have plenty of other interests, and I can
>be quite happy with a simple meal. But I like to cook and I enjoy eating
>good food. I like spices and vegetables and ethnic foods, and a wide variety
>of things.

[snip]

I simplify it even further. Someone that eats to live is only
interested in food as fuel. They don't care what it is, generally,
because they're not interested in the subtleties (sight, smell, taste,
texture) that the other extreme finds so compelling. It's simply
something they need and will, generally, consume in record gulps. A
subset of this group is Quantity-over-Quality.

The Ranger
 
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:31:40 +0000, Henhouse
<[email protected]> wrote:

>My friend got quite heated about it all, and told me that if I'd got
>four kids and was working full time, I'd soon change my ways and opt for
>foods I could just stick in the microwave (not that she has the four
>kids etc., just the one 25yr old son). I'm not likely to ever find
>myself in that position, but I imagine that if I had children I'd be
>even more concerned about the foods they were eating than I am about my
>own. I could be wrong, of course!


I have 2 kids, I have always worked 80%, and I have never bought
processed food (except for the 4 weeks during our kitchen renovation,
and if I ever had the slightest doubt about what junk those ready-made
meals are, well that time certainly cured me of it...).
When my kids were really little (< 3 yo), I perfected the art of
making good, from scratch, 30 minute meals (that way I would cook when
their father was home and he would watch them). A very useful
experience I must say.
So your friend doesn't really know what she's talking about. Plus, if
you have a big family, ready-made meals are way too expensive. When we
had that 4 week stint with them, my kids were 9 and 6, and 4 portions
weren't enough for the 4 of us, and expensive to boot.
Be a "food snob" and enjoy it - I do ;-)

Nathalie in Switzerland
 
On 18 Mar 2006 09:31:44 -0800, "dee" <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
> Just to clarify, my reply about "the meal more
> important then the person" is not sarcastic, it
> is what I am like sometimes


It's all about balance.

The Ranger
--
Never give the good stuff to the neighbors who wandered over, but
always have something to give them!
-- M.L.'s personal Code of the West
 
If she called you a food snob (or maybe she implied it and you supplied the
label yourself?) she is not talking about your free range duck l'orange or
any of that, she is talking about the way you are treating her.

You want validation from this ng about "What is wrong with her?" and "Why
can't she be like me (us)?" when you should be saying what is wrong with
this picture--what about my actions are making me seem to be a snob to her
(and maybe other friends she talks to?)? If it was absolutely untrue you
wouldn't be worrying about it. Do you truly care about her, or is it "How
dare you call me a snob, you little piece of ****?" How much do you value
this "friendship?"

You could call her up at lunchtime and say "What are you making for lunch
today?" "Hot dogs on white-bread buns and chips, with kool-aid." "Sounds
good, mind if I join you?" "Sure." It won't kill you. Next time she might
feel comfortable calling and inviting you and you say " Burritos and grape
soda? Great, I have some blahblahblah I need to eat up, can I toss it in a
salad and bring it?" "Sure." Do you invite her over when you are just
grazing for lunch or is it always free range fois gras with white truffle
sauce? It's called being friendly. What's important to you, the friend or
your status? Sounds like a status issue to me, and you feel like she's on to
you--not a comfortable position.

You are the only one with the answers depending on what you want out of it:
want the friend?: Friends are equals in things that are most important; want
the status?: Keep going overboard when ever she's around.

You might get validation from your "peers" here but you won't get good
answers from anyone who says it is not your own problem, but that it's OK to
blame somebody else's attributes, and to judge them.

Anybody ready to pounce OT on food stamp recipients en mass with Nineteenth
Century stereotypes is more needy than the financially unfortunate
themselves, and should read an intelligent book once in awhile, or otherwise
stick to what little they actually know something about. There are people
here who have obviously become comfortable splaying uninformed opinions on
any opportunity to make issues because they can count on the support of
familiarity.

In any event, it is not an enviable position to be in; wondering whether or
not you are truly a food snob. Even the most downtrodden single-mother-
with- six- kids food-stamp recipient would have pity on you under such a
burden. I would bet they wouldn't trade one snotty nose to be in your shoes.

Lefty
--
Life is for learning


"Henhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
> A friend of mine accused me of being a food snob the other day. Why?
> Because I don't buy processed food, and never go to fast food eateries.
> I also always buy free range chicken and use either eggs from our own
> free range chooks, or bought duck eggs. I also buy organic foods from
> time to time, and try to buy seasonally and locally (being aware of food
> miles etc.) Does this really make me a food snob? I feel quite insulted,
> to tell you the truth - I don't dictate what others should eat, I just
> make the choices I prefer. I enjoy cooking and have the time to spend
> doing it, plus access to great local produce - I'm not sure why this
> could be seen as wrong in some way!
>
> My friend got quite heated about it all, and told me that if I'd got
> four kids and was working full time, I'd soon change my ways and opt for
> foods I could just stick in the microwave (not that she has the four
> kids etc., just the one 25yr old son). I'm not likely to ever find
> myself in that position, but I imagine that if I had children I'd be
> even more concerned about the foods they were eating than I am about my
> own. I could be wrong, of course!
>
> This is the same friend who is happy to come to dinner at my house, but
> who refuses to return the favour, as she is 'frightened' of cooking for
> me, as I am (allegedly) good at it - LOL! I'd be happy with beans on
> toast, if someone else had cooked it - but that's by the by.
>
> Anyway, I was wondering if anyone else here has suffered a similar
> accusation, and had any good arguments with which to refute it? Or
> perhaps you think my friend is right and I'm just too precious about the
> whole topic? Opinions welcomed!
>
> Jo