How Ed Dolan and Mike Vandeman came to dominate their newsgroups



Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> Well, that is ONE possible solution, but then what would I have to do.
> >> >> Besides, I add interest to what would otherwise be a very dull group.
> >> >> It
> >> >> would not be fair to those who come to ARBR and RBS expecting some
> >> >> entertainment.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for validating what I said of you in the past ... Ed Dolan has
> >> > little more than ARBR from which to derive meaning in his life. The
> >> > Usenet newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has assumed an exaggerated
> >> > prominence in his hierarchical order of relevance. The Usenet
> >> > newsgroup (particularly ARBR) has emerged as the source from which he
> >> > garners his sense of accomplishment and self-esteem. Regardless of his
> >> > opinion of the readership, without the lifeblood of the Usenet
> >> > newsgroup audience to sustain him, Ed Dolan has nothing and is nothing.
> >> > What a pathetic shallow existence. Pity the cantankerous, misguided,
> >> > quintessential fool. It must really suck to be head swollen ... HEAD
> >> > Dolan.
> >> >
> >> > Jim McNamara
> >>
> >> Here is Jim yet once more expressing all those doubts about himself. It
> >> is
> >> really too bad he cannot go forth into the world like Ed Dolan the Great,
> >> oblivious to all but himself. I stopped checking my credentials with
> >> others
> >> by the time I was out of my teens, but apparently some guys just never
> >> get
> >> out of their teens.
> >>
> >
> > Ed ... yes, I'm addressing you personally, whether you like it or not
> > ... your response can be considered as nothng less that an admission
> > that your reading comprehesnion skills are second rate, and you were
> > once a librarian??? How sadl!!! - Jim McNamara
>
> You may be addressing me, but I am addressing a universe of unknown readers.
> You merely serve as a vehicle for what I want so say. Keep those messages
> coming to me personally and I will keep my messages going to a universe of
> readers.

A universe of deaf ears does not an audience make - Jim McNamara.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
> >>>
> >>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>> news:[email protected]...
> >> [...]
> >>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
> >>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of them
> >>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want intelligence,
> >>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
> >>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
> >>>>
> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >>> To who...?
> >>>>
> >>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
> >>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole and
> >>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
> >>
> >> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is being
> >> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet, he
> >> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
> >> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because he
> >> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like Saint
> >> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because he
> >> is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a man
> >> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
> >
> > "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> > "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> > Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> > hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> > Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> > not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> > comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill effects
> > are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
> > Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
> > progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can not
> > grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In charge
> > of the picture books?
>
> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already said a
> thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
> posts.
>
> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide which
> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner and
> would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker is
> the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara for
> instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
>
> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> interesting as myself.

Not even Sherman or Vandeman???

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:eek:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >>
> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
> >> to his posts.
> >>
> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
> > reading or responding to any other post.
> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>
> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.

Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.

> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
> >> Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> stalker too.
> >
> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
> > am Greater than I really am.
>
> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> charging you something for my services.

Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara


> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >
> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:eek:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not "impact"
> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some reaction.
> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could
> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >>
> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
> >> to his posts.
> >>
> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person from
> > reading or responding to any other post.
> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>
> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it is
> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something is
> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons. You
> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.

Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.

> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be
> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at
> >> Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> stalker too.
> >
> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
> > am Greater than I really am.
>
> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and a
> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> charging you something for my services.

Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara


> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
>> >
>> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:eek:[email protected]...
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
>> >>> "impact"
>> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
>> >>> reaction.
>> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
>> >>> is
>> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
>> >>> is
>> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
>> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
>> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
>> >>> could
>> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
>> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
>> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
>> >>
>> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
>> >> is
>> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
>> >> respond
>> >> to his posts.
>> >>
>> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
>> > from
>> > reading or responding to any other post.
>> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>>
>> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
>> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
>> is
>> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
>> is
>> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
>> You
>> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
>> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
>
> Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
>
>> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
>> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
>> >> be
>> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
>> >> at
>> >> Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
>> >> stalker too.
>> >
>> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
>> > I
>> > am Greater than I really am.
>>
>> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
>> and a
>> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
>> charging you something for my services.
>
> Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
> claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
> only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
> adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
> up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
> I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara

Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
jerks and assholes.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
>> >
>> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >>
>> >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
>> >>>
>> >>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >>> news:[email protected]...
>> >> [...]
>> >>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
>> >>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of
>> >>>>>> them
>> >>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want
>> >>>>>> intelligence,
>> >>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
>> >>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
>> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thus proving my point!
>> >>> To who...?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
>> >>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
>> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thus proving my point!
>> >>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole
>> >>> and
>> >>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
>> >>
>> >> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is
>> >> being
>> >> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet,
>> >> he
>> >> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
>> >> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because
>> >> he
>> >> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like
>> >> Saint
>> >> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because
>> >> he
>> >> is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a
>> >> man
>> >> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
>> >
>> > "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>> > "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>> > Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
>> > "impact"
>> > hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
>> > reaction.
>> > Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
>> > not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
>> > comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
>> > effects
>> > are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
>> > Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
>> > progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can
>> > not
>> > grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
>> > charge
>> > of the picture books?
>>
>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
>> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>> said a
>> thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
>> posts.
>>
>> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>> which
>> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
>> and
>> would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker
>> is
>> the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara
>> for
>> instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
>>
>> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
>> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
>> interesting as myself.
>
> Not even Sherman or Vandeman???

Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life. Sherman and
Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet
them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
course.

I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I
grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was
posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he
steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about
recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "Chris Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>>>> Jim is into nothing but gobbledygook. He has always been that way.
>>>> But it is good to see one turkey (Chris) recognize another turkey
>>>> (Jim).
>>>
>>> What a lame comeback ... brain-dead. Is that the best you can do???
>>> Ed Dolan is intoxicated by his own cerebral flatulence. His screeds
>>> (read Gospels according to St. Edward) are legendary. A pretentious
>>> purveyor of disinformation, Ed employs cyclical, incoherent rhetoric
>>> to advocate his own personal agenda. He subscribes to the mistaken
>>> notion that the readership savors his prosaic prefunctory prattle
>>> whereas in reality the only person who values what the man says is
>>> the man saying it. Ed is a pedant who is enraptured by his own
>>> vacuous gibberish.
>>>
>>> Not bad gobbledygook coming from a turkey, huh Ed??? Chris Foster,
>>> GaryG, Bill Baka and cc are just a few of the many who have come to
>>> know you for what and who you are. Your reputaton as ARBR's
>>> quintessential TROLL will forever be your legacy. You can take
>>> leave of us now. Can't do it can you? After all, Usenet is your
>>> life. How sick is that???
>>>
>>> Jim McNamara
>>
>> Well said !!
>
> All the world hates a piling on kind of message. I cannot believe you
> were ever a Marine. Your present character says you have never been
> anything but a scoundrel. Are all Marines bullies like you?
>

Pathetic, simply pathetic.

Your feeble attempt at character assassination is duly noted

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
stirs up ****.
Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled
with
interminably long messages since he never snips.
These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently his
shriveled sense of self esteem.
Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await
retirement.

The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his
drivel.

Oh well, it's an open usenet.
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >> >
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:eek:[email protected]...
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
> >> >>> "impact"
> >> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
> >> >>> reaction.
> >> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
> >> >>> could
> >> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >> >>
> >> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
> >> >> is
> >> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
> >> >> respond
> >> >> to his posts.
> >> >>
> >> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
> >> > from
> >> > reading or responding to any other post.
> >> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
> >>
> >> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> >> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
> >> is
> >> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
> >> is
> >> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
> >> You
> >> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> >> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
> >
> > Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
> >
> >> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
> >> >> be
> >> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
> >> >> at
> >> >> Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> >> stalker too.
> >> >
> >> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
> >> > I
> >> > am Greater than I really am.
> >>
> >> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
> >> and a
> >> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> >> charging you something for my services.
> >
> > Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
> > claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
> > only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
> > adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
> > up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
> > I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara
>
> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
> jerks and assholes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:DNEog.26027$FR1.24658@dukeread05...
> >> >
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:eek:[email protected]...
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >> >>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >> >>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
> >> >>> "impact"
> >> >>> hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
> >> >>> reaction.
> >> >>> Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails
> >> >>> is
> >> >>> comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >> >>> effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all
> >> >>> comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
> >> >>> could
> >> >>> have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently,
> >> >>> you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were
> >> >>> you...? In charge of the picture books?
> >> >>
> >> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
> >> >> is
> >> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> >> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to
> >> >> respond
> >> >> to his posts.
> >> >>
> >> > Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
> >> > from
> >> > reading or responding to any other post.
> >> > Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
> >>
> >> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> >> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
> >> is
> >> all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
> >> is
> >> dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
> >> You
> >> desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> >> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.
> >
> > Right ... You are cacophony of bushit all up an down the scale.
> >
> >> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> >> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
> >> >> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
> >> >> be
> >> >> a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
> >> >> at
> >> >> Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
> >> >> stalker too.
> >> >
> >> > Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think
> >> > I
> >> > am Greater than I really am.
> >>
> >> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker
> >> and a
> >> leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> >> charging you something for my services.
> >
> > Say Steve ... from one stalkeg to another ;^) ... Despit what DOlan
> > claims, this doens't take any degree of intelligcnce and Ed isn't the
> > only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are. You are an Ed Dolan
> > adversary and an Ed Dolan irritant and you are doing a great job. Keep
> > up the good work. By the way, there is no charge for my surfaces.
> > I'll undercut Dolan's price any day. - Jim McNamara
>
> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom Sherman.
> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one worthy
> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by idiots,
> jerks and assholes.

Intellect is a required given necessary for constructing verbiage.
What don't you understand about this basic concept ... dullard. - Jim
McNamara.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
Edward Dolan wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:pdCog.26013$FR1.25358@dukeread05...
> >> >
> >> > "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >> >>
> >> >> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >> news:Aydog.25977$FR1.17618@dukeread05...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >>> news:[email protected]...
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>>>>> ALL newsgroups without any exceptions whatsoever are by and for
> >> >>>>>> idiots. Therefore, it does not matter what gets posted on any of
> >> >>>>>> them
> >> >>>>>> since only idiots like Curtiss are present. If you want
> >> >>>>>> intelligence,
> >> >>>>>> then go to a moderated forum where an editor will get rid of the
> >> >>>>>> idiots and their idiotic messages.
> >> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great idiot
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >> >>> To who...?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>> I repeat, there is no one on these newsgroups (unmoderated) except
> >> >>>>>> assholes and jerks! What else do you need to know?
> >> >>>>> Hello Dolan, the great asshole and jerk.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thus proving my point!
> >> >>> You didn't have to work so hard to prove you are an idiot, asshole
> >> >>> and
> >> >>> jerk. We've known that for quite some time.
> >> >>
> >> >> The only thing worse than being an idiot, an asshole and a jerk is
> >> >> being
> >> >> Curtiss. He is nothing but a pathetic stalker of Vandeman. Worse yet,
> >> >> he
> >> >> does nothing but regurgitate boilerplate nonsense about how mountain
> >> >> biking does not impact hikers. He does both of these things because
> >> >> he
> >> >> is evil through and through. He would like to be a Great Saint like
> >> >> Saint
> >> >> Edward the Great, but that option is forever foreclosed to him because
> >> >> he
> >> >> is a man of the groin preoccupied with ****, **** and sex and not a
> >> >> man
> >> >> of the holy spirit like Saint Edward the Great.
> >> >
> >> > "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
> >> > "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
> >> > Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
> >> > "impact"
> >> > hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
> >> > reaction.
> >> > Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence shows it is
> >> > not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife and trails is
> >> > comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning any ill
> >> > effects
> >> > are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and all comments to
> >> > Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments could have on
> >> > progress in sharing and preserving natural areas. Apparently, you can
> >> > not
> >> > grasp that simple concept. What kind of "librarian" were you...? In
> >> > charge
> >> > of the picture books?
> >>
> >> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
> >> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
> >> said a
> >> thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond to his
> >> posts.
> >>
> >> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
> >> which
> >> side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to dinner
> >> and
> >> would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To be a stalker
> >> is
> >> the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look at Jim McNamara
> >> for
> >> instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a stalker too.
> >>
> >> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda and
> >> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
> >> interesting as myself.
> >
> > Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
>
> Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life.

It is not be, but you you has blurred the distinction here. Cyberspace
has taken on a life of its own for you. Sadly, cyberspace is your life
and the readership are all very aware of that. - Jim McNamara

> Sherman and
> Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I meet
> them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
> course.
>
> I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but I
> grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
> him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he was
> posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
> last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because he
> steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more about
> recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>>>>
>>>> "ed the insignificant and edward the nonexistant"... states I am
>>>> "regurgitating" for the at least the 12th time or so... LOL
>>>> Besides, I have never said cycling (or other activities) do not
>>>> "impact" hikers... Any activity coexisting with another will have some
>>>> reaction. Vandy tries to paint it completely negative, which evidence
>>>> shows it is not. I have said the impacts on the environment, wildlife
>>>> and trails is comparable to hiking and Vandeman's statements concerning
>>>> any ill effects are not substantiated. That is the basis for any and
>>>> all comments to Vandeman. To counter the negative impact his comments
>>>> could have on progress in sharing and preserving natural areas.
>>>> Apparently, you can not grasp that simple concept. What kind of
>>>> "librarian" were you...? In charge of the picture books?
>>>
>>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There is
>>> nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not already
>>> said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity to respond
>>> to his posts.
>>>
>> Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
>> from reading or responding to any other post.
>> Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>
> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
> is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way. Something
> is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or two persons.
> You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
> Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny.

Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread the
Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have continued the
topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to draw attention away
from your cross-posting disaster.

You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is
someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the opinions
of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same "argument" in
several spots. Beyond meaningless.

Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best
describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
sorrowfully miniscule.


>
>>> You and I have both had our say and it is now up to others to decide
>>> which side they want to come down on. You are like the man who came to
>>> dinner and would not leave. Please get a freaking life of your own. To
>>> be a stalker is the most pitiful and pathetic creature you can be. Look
>>> at Jim McNamara for instance. And Chris Foster is becoming nothing but a
>>> stalker too.
>>
>> Oh please... All this attention for me. You are going to make me think I
>> am Greater than I really am.
>
> I am the only one on Usenet who will tell you what you are - a stalker and
> a leech! No one else has the intelligence to do this. I should really be
> charging you something for my services.
> [...]
I don't have any monopoly money.

This thread is dead. The same "argument" in several spots. Beyond
meaningless.
Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that best
describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
sorrowfully miniscule.
 
"JP" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:bJQog.3910$H32.2183@trndny06...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

>A troll sets up camp in a newsgroup where he's got nothing to offer and
>stirs up ****.
> Then he responds to any answers to create interminably long threads filled
> with
> interminably long messages since he never snips.

I am actually the world's best editor and know how to snip better than
anyone, but Usenet is full of idiots who do not know how to do anything much
except mouth off. Since that is the case, I feel it is better to do no
editing than to do too much editing - which is the primary mistake of almost
all Usenet users.

For instance, you have made several mistakes in your present post, but I
will let them stand so as not to confuse anyone further than you already
have.

> These strings of nonsense help boost his sense of power and consequently
> his
> shriveled sense of self esteem.
> Typical of cubicle dwellers who've been shunted off to a deadend to await
> retirement.

I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
anything at all about how the other half lives.

> The only order of perpetual sorrow is populated by those exposed to his
> drivel.
>
> Oh well, it's an open usenet.

Many thanks for the kind words JP. Ed Dolan the Great is always appreciative
of those who appreciate him like you do.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am actually the world's best editor

don't know what you smoke or drink, but you may want to consider putting
it on the market.

--
Save the Planet! Kill yourself!

Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
"JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> Actually I require some intellectuality and that is the one thing that is
>> sorely lacking from all my current adversaries. I really miss Tom
>> Sherman.
>> He at least tried to display some intellect from time to time. Poor Jimbo
>> thinks verbiage is a substitute for thought. And so it goes - no one
>> worthy
>> of me. It is apparently my destiny to go through life surrounded by
>> idiots,
>> jerks and assholes.
>
> Intellect is a required given necessary for constructing verbiage.
> What don't you understand about this basic concept ... dullard. - Jim
> McNamara.

I have known several persons who could speak many foreign languages
fluently, but could never say anything sensible in any of them. In other
words, there is verbiage and then there is intellect. One requires a certain
facility, the other requires that you think. It may be that you are an idiot
savant, which is a person who has only one outstanding, almost freakish,
ability and is lacking in everything else. I always advise folks who can't
think to rely on the common sense they were born with.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:6ATog.26044$FR1.4962@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
[...]
>>>> Curtiss, it is now time for you to shut up concerning Vandeman. There
>>>> is nothing you can say about his posts and him that you have not
>>>> already said a thousand times before. Give some others an opportunity
>>>> to respond to his posts.
>>>>
>>> Anybody can respond to any post. My posts do not stop a single person
>>> from reading or responding to any other post.
>>> Take a valium and relax. Your poor little heart must be about to burst.
>>
>> Yes, I used to say that in response to others who would complain about my
>> posts to ARBR, but take a look at RBS. How do you account for the fact it
>> is all about you and Vandeman. ARBR was never like RBS that way.
>> Something is dreadfully wrong when a newsgorup is all about just one or
>> two persons. You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are
>> both one note Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note
>> Johnny.
>
> Really...? Then I would suggest you drop it. After all, you spread the
> Vandy topic into other realms of rec/alt bicycles. You have continued the
> topic with silly accusations and your own attempts to draw attention away
> from your cross-posting disaster.

"You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny." - Ed Dolan

> You are merely extending the topic so you can continue to claim it is
> someone else's fault. If you want to post on point concerning the opinions
> of MV, have at it. Otherwise, this thread is dead. The same "argument" in
> several spots. Beyond meaningless.

"You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny." - Ed Dolan

> Any further responses will be in the thread titled "Impotence" as that
> best describes the influence of ed dolan the minimal, aka: st edward the
> sorrowfully miniscule.

"You desperately need to stop responding to Vandeman. You are both one note
Johnnys and you have ruined RBS. I was never a one note Johnny." - Ed Dolan
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"JimmyMac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Edward Dolan wrote:
[...]
>> >> The Great Ed Dolan does not ever stalk anyone. I have my own agenda
>> >> and
>> >> cannot even imagine anyone else in the universe to be even remotely as
>> >> interesting as myself.
>> >
>> > Not even Sherman or Vandeman???
>>
>> Jim, unlike you, I do not confuse cyperspace with real life.
>
> It is not be, but you you has blurred the distinction here. Cyberspace
> has taken on a life of its own for you. Sadly, cyberspace is your life
> and the readership are all very aware of that. - Jim McNamara

Nope, not true. Usenet is nothing to me except a joke! The minute I am no
longer having any fun here, I will leave.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota



>> Sherman and
>> Vandeman are only what I read on my computer screen. Unless and until I
>> meet
>> them in person, that is all they can ever be.The same goes for you too of
>> course.
>>
>> I will admit I think I was stalking Tom Sherman at one time briefly, but
>> I
>> grew disgusted with myself for doing that and I decided I would only take
>> him on when he got outrageously stupid. I always left him alone when he
>> was
>> posting on topic and I would only take him on when he got political. The
>> last year or so Tom and I did not have much to say to one another because
>> he
>> steered away from political topics almost entirely. He knew far more
>> about
>> recumbents than I did and I respected him for that.
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>
Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
and that's why they let you online?
 
"JP" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3YZog.3499$Bb.493@trndny01...


"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
> anything at all about how the other half lives.

Is that what you call it when you were institutionalized?
I live in a world of sanity Eddie, not your half.
The staff must be proud of your cheerfull "glass half full" mentality
and that's why they let you online?

Edward Dolan wrote:

Yea, I can see it is my destiny to be forever surrounded by characters who
are idiots, jerks and assholes.

Why is it considered virtuous to work like a slave all of your life when you
really don't have to. Just don't get married, don't procreate, don't buy a
house and a new car, etc. It is really quite simple, but most men are fools
and live lives of quiet desperation.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"di" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:pJYog.26062$FR1.6589@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "JP" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:bJQog.3910$H32.2183@trndny06...
>>
>>
>> I retired at the ripe old age of 30, but I don't expect you would know
>> anything at all about how the other half lives.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>
>>
>
> Got fired and personality prevented you from finding another job?

Jobs are for workers (slaves) like you, not for Gods like me!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

PS. Post to ARBR if you want me to see your freaking messages, you moron!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Why Ed Dolan is worthless!
Replies
3
Views
2K
Recumbent bicycles
!Jones
J
T
Re: Edward Dolan says RBT is clueless. True?... please! tell theTRUTH!
Replies
0
Views
1K
Recumbent bicycles
Tom Sherman
T
W
Re: The evolution of Ed Dolan on Usenet
Replies
0
Views
967
Recumbent bicycles
Wilson Warmouth
W
M
Re: Ed Dolan and the French
Replies
4
Views
936
Recumbent bicycles
Michael Press
M
T
THE HOLY GRAIL (was: Ed Dolan - the Grate Troll! The Saga Continues!)
Replies
0
Views
779
Recumbent bicycles
Tom Sherman
T
Top Bottom Back