If you don't believe in Evolution, then why do you drive an SUV?



nafuk wrote:
> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>
>> news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...
>>
>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> I think I read that during the Carboniferous period that
>>> the earth was as hot as it has ever been.

>>
>>> ISTR that one of the reasons was due to large amounts of
>>> water vapor in the air (volcanoes? geothermal activity?).
>>> Can't remember what the source of it was. Maybe just
>>> evaporation from oceans.

>>
>>> At any rate, the air can be very heavily saturated with
>>> water without it raining, or without rain clearing up
>>> the humidity. Check out many of the tropical locations
>>> of the world where heavy rains don't lessen humidity.

>>
>> From:
>>
>> http://www.wxdude.com/humidity.html
>>
>> Air can only hold 100% relative humidity. For rain the 100% relative
>> humidity is at the altitude where the rain is coming from, not the
>> ground where the humidity gage is normally. It takes some time for
>> the 100% humidity "mist" to form into drops which fall as rain.
>> There are cases where there can be super cooled water being more
>> than 100%, but that is rare.
>>
>> So for all practical purposes vapor is not going to do much to
>> increase global warming because it will precipitate out as rain when
>> it reaches 100% humidity at some place in the atmosphere. Since we
>> get rain now, the air is often saturated at some place with the
>> maximum moisture it can hold.

>
> There are three gases emitted by aircraft which contribute to global
> warming: H2O, CO2 and NOx The most obvious is the water vapour which
> forms condensation trails - clouds of frozen ice crystals. Since the
> air in the upper troposphere (the level at which most commerical
> planes fly) is naturally very dry, water vapour emitted by aircraft
> can make a big difference. Sometimes the contrails cover the whole
> sky. Have you ever wondered, why the sky is so much clearer in remoter
> locations?
>
> Although these contrails reflect a little sunlight away from earth,
> they reflect back to earth much more invisible infra-red (heat)
> radiation which would otherwise escape to space - and therefore they
> have an overall warming effect. This is hard to measure accurately,
> because the contrails eventually spread out and become
> indistinguishable from natural cirrus clouds.
>
> Not all of the water vapour forms contrails, but water is itself a
> "greenhouse gas" which also traps this outgoing infra-red radiation.
> Each water molecule traps much more heat and also survives much longer
> at this height than it would do at sea-level.
>
> Jet-fuel - kerosene - is a mixture of substances produced by
> distilling crude oil, which can be represented by C13H28. The chemical
> equation for burning it is as follows:
> 2C13H28 + 40O2 =>26CO2 + 28H2O
>
> So you can see, that for every 14 water molecules produced, the
> aircraft must also emit 13 of CO2. This is also a greenhouse gas and
> will stay in the atmosphere warming the earth for an average of 100
> years, some of it for 1000s of years. There's no way that you can get
> the energy from such fossil fuel without producing that much CO2. It's
> not a by-product that can be "scrubbed" from the exhaust.


So...Al Gore should quit riding around in his 1970s-era Gulfstream? Don't
hold your breath! (You'll just emit a greenhouse gas, anyway!)

Bill "this **** would be really, really funny if it wasn't taken so really,
really seriously by so really, really many" S.
 
On Jan 8, 9:05 pm, Peacemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> god put the oil in the earth for us to use.
> God put the animal bones there to test our faith.
> Unless god says there is global warming, there isn't.


That pretty much sums up the basic belief of many Christians.

It doesn't make sense. But, hey, God didn't give us the brain to
think.

I wonder though why God gave us a brain.
 
What "Bike for Peace" is all about...

Well, I want to put together the idea behind the revolution (http://
atom.smasher.org/streetparty/?l1=Coming+Soon%3A&l2=the&l3=Banana
+Revolution%21&l4=). There are two Bike for Peace, my own (http://
webspawner.com/users/bikeforpeace) and somebody else's (http://
bikeforpeace.org). The two ideas are complementary, and my T-shirts as
a wearable banner (http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution) and
his stickers all are aimed at a more bicycle friendly world. No Mao,
Che or Chavez. Those are stupid lions hungry for power. The revolution
is about getting on a bike and making those tires revolve around its
axis.

Notice in his website this great story of how someone from Bike for
Peace did just that, from Couch Potato to Bicycle Commuter...

http://www.runmuki.com/commute/index.html
 
On Jan 9, 10:36 am, donquijote1954 <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I wonder though why God gave us a brain.


If we had been meant to use our brains they wouldn't have come packed
so well, up inside our hindquarters.
 
On Jan 9, 2:45 pm, DennisTheBald <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 10:36 am, donquijote1954 <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I wonder though why God gave us a brain.

>
> If we had been meant to use our brains they wouldn't have come packed
> so well, up inside our hindquarters.


"A brain is a terrible thing to waste," or something like that says
the slogan.

Cyclists though do have to use their brain in order to survive. SUV
drivers don't. In that they are similar to sheep...

(Would this fact make cyclists the black sheep? Maybe)

This comment is from actual sheep behavior...

Wait For Me
Sheep have a strong instinct to follow the leader. When one sheep
decides to go somewhere, the rest of the flock usually follows, even
if it is not a good decision. For example, if the lead sheep jumps
over a cliff, the others are likely to follow. Even from birth, lambs
are conditioned to follow the older members of the flock.
http://www.sheep101.info/flocking.html

From Jim Jones to some leaders we have today, they have understood how
to lead the sheep... into a cliff.

But you are just a thinking person, and don't want to be part of
collective suicide. You are the Black Sheep --and proud of it!
http://www.zazzle.com/donquijote1954/product/235821287705130969
 
I'm just telling ya, that's what the signs say: Up to 15% ethanol.
 
Bill Sornson wrote:
> nafuk wrote:
>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...
>>>
>>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> I think I read that during the Carboniferous period that
>>>> the earth was as hot as it has ever been.
>>>> ISTR that one of the reasons was due to large amounts of
>>>> water vapor in the air (volcanoes? geothermal activity?).
>>>> Can't remember what the source of it was. Maybe just
>>>> evaporation from oceans.
>>>> At any rate, the air can be very heavily saturated with
>>>> water without it raining, or without rain clearing up
>>>> the humidity. Check out many of the tropical locations
>>>> of the world where heavy rains don't lessen humidity.
>>> From:
>>>
>>> http://www.wxdude.com/humidity.html
>>>
>>> Air can only hold 100% relative humidity. For rain the 100% relative
>>> humidity is at the altitude where the rain is coming from, not the
>>> ground where the humidity gage is normally. It takes some time for
>>> the 100% humidity "mist" to form into drops which fall as rain.
>>> There are cases where there can be super cooled water being more
>>> than 100%, but that is rare.
>>>
>>> So for all practical purposes vapor is not going to do much to
>>> increase global warming because it will precipitate out as rain when
>>> it reaches 100% humidity at some place in the atmosphere. Since we
>>> get rain now, the air is often saturated at some place with the
>>> maximum moisture it can hold.

>> There are three gases emitted by aircraft which contribute to global
>> warming: H2O, CO2 and NOx The most obvious is the water vapour which
>> forms condensation trails - clouds of frozen ice crystals. Since the
>> air in the upper troposphere (the level at which most commerical
>> planes fly) is naturally very dry, water vapour emitted by aircraft
>> can make a big difference. Sometimes the contrails cover the whole
>> sky. Have you ever wondered, why the sky is so much clearer in remoter
>> locations?
>>
>> Although these contrails reflect a little sunlight away from earth,
>> they reflect back to earth much more invisible infra-red (heat)
>> radiation which would otherwise escape to space - and therefore they
>> have an overall warming effect. This is hard to measure accurately,
>> because the contrails eventually spread out and become
>> indistinguishable from natural cirrus clouds.
>>
>> Not all of the water vapour forms contrails, but water is itself a
>> "greenhouse gas" which also traps this outgoing infra-red radiation.
>> Each water molecule traps much more heat and also survives much longer
>> at this height than it would do at sea-level.
>>
>> Jet-fuel - kerosene - is a mixture of substances produced by
>> distilling crude oil, which can be represented by C13H28. The chemical
>> equation for burning it is as follows:
>> 2C13H28 + 40O2 =>26CO2 + 28H2O
>>
>> So you can see, that for every 14 water molecules produced, the
>> aircraft must also emit 13 of CO2. This is also a greenhouse gas and
>> will stay in the atmosphere warming the earth for an average of 100
>> years, some of it for 1000s of years. There's no way that you can get
>> the energy from such fossil fuel without producing that much CO2. It's
>> not a by-product that can be "scrubbed" from the exhaust.

>
> So...Al Gore should quit riding around in his 1970s-era Gulfstream? Don't
> hold your breath! (You'll just emit a greenhouse gas, anyway!)
>
> Bill "this **** would be really, really funny if it wasn't taken so really,
> really seriously by so really, really many" S.


I hope I am around long enough to laugh at the collapse of civilization.
Foolish humans need to be taught a harsh lesson to learn anything.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth
 
donquijote1954 who? wrote:
> On Jan 8, 9:05 pm, Peacemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> god put the oil in the earth for us to use.
>> God put the animal bones there to test our faith.
>> Unless god says there is global warming, there isn't.

>
> That pretty much sums up the basic belief of many Christians.
>
> It doesn't make sense. But, hey, God didn't give us the brain to
> think.
>
> I wonder though why God gave us a brain.
>

But, at least at the end, God apologizes to creation for the inconvenience.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth
 
Pat wrote:
> I'm just telling ya, that's what the signs say: Up to 15% ethanol.


The fuel with up to fifteen (15) percent ethanol and the remaining
fractions derived from petroleum is being sold as "gasoline", not "E85".
"E85" is eighty-five (85) percent ethanol and fifteen percent petroleum
derivatives.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth
 
"Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bill Sornson wrote:
>> nafuk wrote:
>>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...
>>>>
>>>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message

really seriously by so really, really many" S.
>
> I hope I am around long enough to laugh at the collapse of civilization.
> Foolish humans need to be taught a harsh lesson to learn anything.


People learn the most by solving the problems that confront them. That is
exactly what we will be doing by developing alternative energy sources that
solve the greenhouse problem.

Almost nothing is learned by fantasizing punishment for people that don't
agree with you.
 
"Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> donquijote1954 who? wrote:
>> On Jan 8, 9:05 pm, Peacemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> god put the oil in the earth for us to use.
>>> God put the animal bones there to test our faith.
>>> Unless god says there is global warming, there isn't.

>>
>> That pretty much sums up the basic belief of many Christians.
>>
>> It doesn't make sense. But, hey, God didn't give us the brain to
>> think.
>>
>> I wonder though why God gave us a brain.
>>

> But, at least at the end, God apologizes to creation for the
> inconvenience.


Sounds like you don't understand evolution but believe in some undefined
creationism.

Our ability to be highly creative in our development of new capabilities
came from a genetic mutation about 55 thousand years ago.

That gene was propagated by evolution. It greatly increased the survivable
rate of people that had that genetic mutation.
 
Jack May wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bill Sornson wrote:
>>> nafuk wrote:
>>>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message

> really seriously by so really, really many" S.
>> I hope I am around long enough to laugh at the collapse of civilization.
>> Foolish humans need to be taught a harsh lesson to learn anything.

>
> People learn the most by solving the problems that confront them. That is
> exactly what we will be doing by developing alternative energy sources that
> solve the greenhouse problem.
>
> Almost nothing is learned by fantasizing punishment for people that don't
> agree with you.


Here we have Exhibit A of human arrogance. To believe that technology
will solve gross irresponsibility is foolish.

People learn from harsh consequence of their mistakes. If there are no
consequences, they learn nothing.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth
 
Jack May wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> donquijote1954 who? wrote:
>>> On Jan 8, 9:05 pm, Peacemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> god put the oil in the earth for us to use.
>>>> God put the animal bones there to test our faith.
>>>> Unless god says there is global warming, there isn't.
>>> That pretty much sums up the basic belief of many Christians.
>>>
>>> It doesn't make sense. But, hey, God didn't give us the brain to
>>> think.
>>>
>>> I wonder though why God gave us a brain.
>>>

>> But, at least at the end, God apologizes to creation for the
>> inconvenience.

>
> Sounds like you don't understand evolution but believe in some undefined
> creationism.
>
> Our ability to be highly creative in our development of new capabilities
> came from a genetic mutation about 55 thousand years ago.
>
> That gene was propagated by evolution. It greatly increased the survivable
> rate of people that had that genetic mutation.


WHooooooooooooooSH!

DON'T PANIC!

And remember to bring your towel.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth
 
Tom Sherman wrote:
> Pat wrote:
>> I'm just telling ya, that's what the signs say: Up to 15% ethanol.

>
> The fuel with up to fifteen (15) percent ethanol and the remaining
> fractions derived from petroleum is being sold as "gasoline", not "E85".
> "E85" is eighty-five (85) percent ethanol and fifteen percent petroleum
> derivatives.
>

Yes that's right, I thought that is what I said.
 
"Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
>
> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bill Sornson wrote:
>>> nafuk wrote:
>>>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jack May wrote:
>>>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message

> really seriously by so really, really many" S.
>>
>> I hope I am around long enough to laugh at the collapse of civilization.
>> Foolish humans need to be taught a harsh lesson to learn anything.

>
> People learn the most by solving the problems that confront them. That is
> exactly what we will be doing by developing alternative energy sources
> that solve the greenhouse problem.


They sure as hell don't seem to learn anything by preventing problems!
 
"Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jack May wrote:
>> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Bill Sornson wrote:
>>>> nafuk wrote:
>>>>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>


>
> Here we have Exhibit A of human arrogance. To believe that technology will
> solve gross irresponsibility is foolish.


It is a fact of life. If there is a problem that people need to have
solved, there will be people more than willing to solve that problem to make
a lot of money.

> People learn from harsh consequence of their mistakes. If there are no
> consequences, they learn nothing.


Puritans are rather rare these days. Technology is a very large part of our
economy.

Sort of proves that punishment has not been very effective in society, but
making a lot of money with technology has been highly attractive and
effective.
 
On Jan 10, 12:41 pm, "Amy Blankenship"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > Direct attacks on others' deeply held beliefs isn't funny, whether I share
> > them or not.

>
> But when those beliefs are used as cover for evil things then they are
> fair game.
>
> ------------------
>
> But you haven't attacked them as a cover for evil things. You've
> essentially said
>
> "All Christians drive SUV's"
> "SUV's are evil"
> "Therefore, all Christians are evil."
>
> Only you've managed to pad it out to make it much more offensive than that.-


No, I've said driving an SUV (1) is evil, which makes many Christians
evil doers, but not all. Everybody knows not all Christians drive
SUVs, and that many even ride bicycles. We know these get a ticket to
Heaven --if there's one.

(1) Supersized Unnecessary Vehicle, not the smaller utilitarian one.

But let's establish an EVIL RATING SCALE, where bicycling is a 1 and
SUVing is a 10, so we know who's who...

(add 5 point penalty for use of cell phones)

1 Bicycle
2 Public Transportation
3 Scooter
4
5 Small stickshift car
6
7 Minivan
8 Regular car
9 Utilitarian SUV
10 Supersized Unnecessary Vehicle

Then you add it all at the end of the week, and figure if you are on
your way to Hell or Heaven. A passing score would be 5 or below. For
example, if I used the car 3 times (24 points), but used the bicycle
10 times (10), and a scooter 9 times (27 points), I get a 61 point
total. So I divide it by the total trips (22) and get a final average
score of 2.7727. I'm not going to Hell!!!
 
Jack May wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Jack May wrote:
>>> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> Bill Sornson wrote:
>>>>> nafuk wrote:
>>>>>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>

>
>> Here we have Exhibit A of human arrogance. To believe that technology will
>> solve gross irresponsibility is foolish.

>
> It is a fact of life. If there is a problem that people need to have
> solved, there will be people more than willing to solve that problem to make
> a lot of money.


More arrogance in believe that there will always be a technological
solution to the problem. Foolish human will learn otherwise during this
century.

>> People learn from harsh consequence of their mistakes. If there are no
>> consequences, they learn nothing.

>
> Puritans are rather rare these days. Technology is a very large part of our
> economy.
>
> Sort of proves that punishment has not been very effective in society, but
> making a lot of money with technology has been highly attractive and
> effective.


Pride goes before the fall.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth
 
On Jan 10, 12:16 am, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > donquijote1954 who? wrote:
> >> On Jan 8, 9:05 pm, Peacemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> god put the oil in the earth for us to use.
> >>> God put the animal bones there to test our faith.
> >>> Unless god says there is global warming, there isn't.

>
> >> That pretty much sums up the basic belief of many Christians.

>
> >> It doesn't make sense. But, hey, God didn't give us the brain to
> >> think.

>
> >> I wonder though why God gave us a brain.

>
> > But, at least at the end, God apologizes to creation for the
> > inconvenience.

>
> Sounds like you don't understand evolution but believe in some undefined
> creationism.
>
> Our ability to be highly creative in our development of new capabilities
> came from a genetic mutation about 55 thousand years ago.
>
> That gene was propagated by evolution. It greatly increased the survivable
> rate of people that had that genetic mutation.


Have they isolated yet the religious gene? It must come from the "****
Ignoramus"...

Genes may help determine how religious a person is, suggests a new
study of US twins. And the effects of a religious upbringing may fade
with time.

Until about 25 years ago, scientists assumed that religious behaviour
was simply the product of a person's socialisation - or "nurture". But
more recent studies, including those on adult twins who were raised
apart, suggest genes contribute about 40% of the variability in a
person's religiousness.

But it is not clear how that contribution changes with age. A few
studies on children and teenagers - with biological or adoptive
parents - show the children tend to mirror the religious beliefs and
behaviours of the parents with whom they live. That suggests genes
play a small role in religiousness at that age.

Now, researchers led by Laura Koenig, a psychology graduate student at
the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, US, have tried to tease
apart how the effects of nature and nurture vary with time. Their
study suggests that as adolescents grow into adults, genetic factors
become more important in determining how religious a person is, while
environmental factors wane.

http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/03/genes-contribut.html
 
On Jan 10, 12:39 am, Tom Sherman <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Jack May wrote:
> > "Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> Bill Sornson wrote:
> >>> nafuk wrote:
> >>>> On 7 Jan, 22:56, "Jack May" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message

>
> >>>>>news:Zhxgj.9242$Xo1.4668@trnddc06...

>
> >>>>>> Jack May wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Stephen Harding" <[email protected]> wrote in message

> > really seriously by so really, really many" S.
> >> I hope I am around long enough to laugh at the collapse of civilization..
> >> Foolish humans need to be taught a harsh lesson to learn anything.

>
> > People learn the most by solving the problems that confront them.  That is
> > exactly what we will be doing by developing alternative energy sources that
> > solve the greenhouse problem.

>
> > Almost nothing is learned by fantasizing punishment for people that don't
> > agree with you.

>
> Here we have Exhibit A of human arrogance. To believe that technology
> will solve gross irresponsibility is foolish.
>
> People learn from harsh consequence of their mistakes. If there are no
> consequences, they learn nothing.


They only got to learn from history and see what happened in Easter
Island. The people there ended eating each other while their gods
watched indifferently...

"The people of Rapa Nui exhausted all possible resources, including
eating their own dogs and all nesting birds when finally there was
absolutely nothing left. All that was left were the stone giants who
symbolized the devouring of a whole island. The stone giants became
monuments where the islanders could keep faith and honour them in
hopes of a return. By the end, there were more than a thousand moai
(stone statues), which was one for every ten islanders (Wright, 2004).
When the Europeans arrived in the eighteenth century, the worst was
over and they only found one or two living souls per statue."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_Island

Do religious people believe in history though?