IMBA Advocates Illegal Night Riding!



On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:10:29 +0100, Sam Williams <[email protected]>
wrote:

..On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:24:58 +0000, Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:37:13 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]> wrote:
..>
..> .You're an idiot Vandeman. Day Use DOES NOT mean use during the daytime only,
..> .it means no over night use. Sheesh!
..>
..> Hint: Day is not the same as night. DUH!
..
..First off, IANAL, and this is all just my opinion..
..
..However, in this country (UK) the legal meanings of daytime and night-time
..seem to have no clear definition. However, most statutory guidance seems
..to have adopted something similar to the following definition of
..night-time: the period during which the adult population can reasonably be
..expected to be asleep, or is preparing for sleep.
..
..Most local authorities seem to interpret the night-time period to be 11pm
..until 7am. Therefore "daytime use only" could logically be construed to
..mean between 7am and 11pm. In the middle of winter, this would include
..about 5-6 hours in the evening during which it is dark.
..
..From the wording of the original post, which is relaxed in style and
..language, it seems very likely that the IMBA representative
..actually meant riding while it was dark, rather than at night per say.
..After all, mountain bikers are people too and many enjoy their sleep.
..
..A rigid interpretation of the word 'night' as meaning when the park is
..closed, over the more common use in a relaxed English style where it is
..often taken to mean the hours when it is dark, would seem unreasonable.
..
..Therefore it seems to me that the IMBA representative was simply promoting
..riding in the EVENING while the park was still open, which would be in
..keeping with 'daytime use'. Apart from being the only time that people
..with 9-5 jobs can actually get to the parks, this is likely to reduce the
..probability of trail use conflicts as there are very few other users
..around.
..
..Most of the parks here are open during winter evenings, despite the fact
..that is is dark. They usually close the car park gates when they
..shut, as a visible sign to dissuade people from entering.
..
..Riding in the dark evenings while the park is open seems like a sensible
..suggestion to me, provided they take sensible precautions in case they
..sustain a debilitating injury.

ALL mountain bikers think mountain biking is harmless. They don't have a clue
about basic biology. Many animals are forced to be nocturnal, due to the
presence of too many people during the day. And now you want to take the
nighttime ALSO? Mountain biking is immoral and criminal.

..DUH!
..
..2trax.
..
..> .
..> .All that is needed is for the rider to return before the ranger comes around
..> .to lock the gate. I think thej original poster has an excellent idea to ride
..> .without impacting hikers, all he need to do is get back to the car before
..> .the rangers come around to lock the gates. A Day Use park is going to be
..> .open from 0800 to 2100, or some such time - the actual time is not
..> .important, only the idea that there is an opening time and a closing time is
..> .important to understand. Visitors are not allowed to remain past closing
..> .time, that is they can use the park for a day at a time, not several days
..> .continuously. Of course, you can go back day after day, but you can not
..> .remain there continuously through an entire 24 hour period.
..> .
..> .
..> .
..> .
..
..>
..> ===
..> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
..> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
..> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
..>
..> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> ALL mountain bikers think mountain biking is harmless. They don't have a

clue
> about basic biology. Many animals are forced to be nocturnal, due to the
> presence of too many people during the day. And now you want to take the
> nighttime ALSO? Mountain biking is immoral and criminal.
>
> .DUH!



Forced to be nocturnal? Are you stupid or what? (That's rhetorical, we know
you are stupid.)

Animals are naturally nocturnal, especially the small ones. And, the traffic
is so insignificant that if they hear ANYTHING they will hide for a moment,
then continue what they were doing.

Try this experiment next time you are hiking, it may be difficult for you to
do because you go so slow and make so much noise. But when you see a small
animal, squirel perhaps, stop dead in your track and remain silent. Odds are
good that within a minut or two, the same animal will emerge from the bush
where it is hiding. Now, let's extrapolate that to a person that actually
passes by, the animals will not vacate the area, they will only hide for a
minute or two then go back to what they were doing.

Now let's look at this from another direction. The trail takes up about 12
inches, often it is narrower. A trail a mile long passing through a square
mile takes 0.12 acres out of 640 acres, or about 0.0188% of the area. Surely
you do not suggest that the majority of the wildlife in the square mile, 640
acres, lives within the space of the trail.

From yet another direction, the OP wants to ride in the early evening before
the area is closed by the rangers in accordance with published operating
hours of the park. Assuming the sun sets at 5:30 and the parks close at
8:00, that is only 2.5 hours of intrusion, if that is the right word to use.
Assuming sunrise at 6:00am, that leaves 10 hours for uninterupted nocturnal
activities. And with the small number of visitors after dark, the odds
interuption during the earliest nocturnal period are very low, and easily
forgotten by the affected small animals.

And from yet one more perspective, animals were nocturnal long before
mountain bikes came on the scene.
 
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:52:49 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]> wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
..news:[email protected]...
..
..> ALL mountain bikers think mountain biking is harmless. They don't have a
..clue
..> about basic biology. Many animals are forced to be nocturnal, due to the
..> presence of too many people during the day. And now you want to take the
..> nighttime ALSO? Mountain biking is immoral and criminal.
..>
..> .DUH!
..
..
..Forced to be nocturnal? Are you stupid or what? (That's rhetorical, we know
..you are stupid.)
..
..Animals are naturally nocturnal, especially the small ones. And, the traffic
..is so insignificant that if they hear ANYTHING they will hide for a moment,
..then continue what they were doing.
..
..Try this experiment next time you are hiking, it may be difficult for you to
..do because you go so slow and make so much noise. But when you see a small
..animal, squirel perhaps, stop dead in your track and remain silent. Odds are
..good that within a minut or two, the same animal will emerge from the bush
..where it is hiding. Now, let's extrapolate that to a person that actually
..passes by, the animals will not vacate the area, they will only hide for a
..minute or two then go back to what they were doing.
..
..Now let's look at this from another direction. The trail takes up about 12
..inches, often it is narrower. A trail a mile long passing through a square
..mile takes 0.12 acres out of 640 acres, or about 0.0188% of the area. Surely
..you do not suggest that the majority of the wildlife in the square mile, 640
..acres, lives within the space of the trail.
..
..From yet another direction, the OP wants to ride in the early evening before
..the area is closed by the rangers in accordance with published operating
..hours of the park. Assuming the sun sets at 5:30 and the parks close at
..8:00, that is only 2.5 hours of intrusion, if that is the right word to use.
..Assuming sunrise at 6:00am, that leaves 10 hours for uninterupted nocturnal
..activities. And with the small number of visitors after dark, the odds
..interuption during the earliest nocturnal period are very low, and easily
..forgotten by the affected small animals.
..
..And from yet one more perspective, animals were nocturnal long before
..mountain bikes came on the scene.

What an idiot! Why do you think animals run away when humans come along? That's
the same reason they abandon their habitat, when the density of humans (and you
are the densest I have ever met) is too great.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:52:49 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]>

wrote:
>
> .
> ."Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> .news:[email protected]...
> .
> .> ALL mountain bikers think mountain biking is harmless. They don't have

a
> .clue
> .> about basic biology. Many animals are forced to be nocturnal, due to

the
> .> presence of too many people during the day. And now you want to take

the
> .> nighttime ALSO? Mountain biking is immoral and criminal.
> .>
> .> .DUH!
> .
> .
> .Forced to be nocturnal? Are you stupid or what? (That's rhetorical, we

know
> .you are stupid.)
> .
> .Animals are naturally nocturnal, especially the small ones. And, the

traffic
> .is so insignificant that if they hear ANYTHING they will hide for a

moment,
> .then continue what they were doing.
> .
> .Try this experiment next time you are hiking, it may be difficult for you

to
> .do because you go so slow and make so much noise. But when you see a

small
> .animal, squirel perhaps, stop dead in your track and remain silent. Odds

are
> .good that within a minut or two, the same animal will emerge from the

bush
> .where it is hiding. Now, let's extrapolate that to a person that actually
> .passes by, the animals will not vacate the area, they will only hide for

a
> .minute or two then go back to what they were doing.
> .
> .Now let's look at this from another direction. The trail takes up about

12
> .inches, often it is narrower. A trail a mile long passing through a

square
> .mile takes 0.12 acres out of 640 acres, or about 0.0188% of the area.

Surely
> .you do not suggest that the majority of the wildlife in the square mile,

640
> .acres, lives within the space of the trail.
> .
> .From yet another direction, the OP wants to ride in the early evening

before
> .the area is closed by the rangers in accordance with published operating
> .hours of the park. Assuming the sun sets at 5:30 and the parks close at
> .8:00, that is only 2.5 hours of intrusion, if that is the right word to

use.
> .Assuming sunrise at 6:00am, that leaves 10 hours for uninterupted

nocturnal
> .activities. And with the small number of visitors after dark, the odds
> .interuption during the earliest nocturnal period are very low, and easily
> .forgotten by the affected small animals.
> .
> .And from yet one more perspective, animals were nocturnal long before
> .mountain bikes came on the scene.
>
> What an idiot! Why do you think animals run away when humans come along?

That's
> the same reason they abandon their habitat, when the density of humans

(and you
> are the densest I have ever met) is too great.


Yes, you're right, the animals have fled the national parks and forests
because of visitation. I remember a trip to the Grand Canyon, not a single
animal in the forest on the North Rim. All of them have fled. Not.

You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the food
is easy. What a bafoon.
 
Jeff Strickland wrote:

>
> You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the food
> is easy. What a bafoon.
>


OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?

Just to clarify, I work for day use parks. The 'day' has nothing to do
with sun's up or down. The day use means no overnight camping. The idea
is to prevent bums from making camps there as in the sense of hobo
jungles. The day use also has no meaning when it comes to nocturnal
animals.
 
"Paul Cassel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> >
> > You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the

food
> > is easy. What a bafoon.
> >

>
> OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?
>
> Just to clarify, I work for day use parks. The 'day' has nothing to do
> with sun's up or down. The day use means no overnight camping. The idea
> is to prevent bums from making camps there as in the sense of hobo
> jungles. The day use also has no meaning when it comes to nocturnal
> animals.


Oops. buffoon is the one I wanted.

We have been telling him for several days now that Day Use means no
overnight camping, and has nothing to do with where the sun might be. Of
course, you will n ow be called a liar because in the New Vandeman World
Dictionary, of which there is only one in existence and it is in Mike's den,
it is clear to all that day use means to be used in the day time. Duh! How
could you be so stupid to not know that?
 
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:52:08 -0600, Paul Cassel <[email protected]> wrote:

..Jeff Strickland wrote:
..
..>
..> You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the food
..> is easy. What a bafoon.
..>
..
..OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?
..
..Just to clarify, I work for day use parks. The 'day' has nothing to do
..with sun's up or down. The day use means no overnight camping.

Then why can't you call a spade a spade, and say so?

The idea
..is to prevent bums from making camps there as in the sense of hobo
..jungles. The day use also has no meaning when it comes to nocturnal
..animals.

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
Jeff Strickland wrote:

>> You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the food
>> is easy. What a bafoon.


Paul Cassel wrote:
> OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?


The result of a illicit mating between a buffoon and a baboon, perhaps ?
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:52:08 -0600, Paul Cassel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> .Jeff Strickland wrote:
> .
> .>
> .> You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the

food
> .> is easy. What a bafoon.
> .>
> .
> .OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?
> .
> .Just to clarify, I work for day use parks. The 'day' has nothing to do
> .with sun's up or down. The day use means no overnight camping.
>
> Then why can't you call a spade a spade, and say so?
>


They DID say so. Day Use is a term the parks and forests use to denote that
usage is not allowed over 24 hour periods, use is restricted to a subset of
24 hours. It is conceivable that a park might operate a telescope, and Day
Use in that instance would consist almost entirely of hours of darkness.

Of course, you are an idiot and will continue to argue that Day Use has an
entirely different meaning.





> The idea
> .is to prevent bums from making camps there as in the sense of hobo
> .jungles. The day use also has no meaning when it comes to nocturnal
> .animals.
>
> ===
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:14:50 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]> wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
..news:[email protected]...
..> On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:52:08 -0600, Paul Cassel <[email protected]> wrote:
..>
..> .Jeff Strickland wrote:
..> .
..> .>
..> .> You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because the
..food
..> .> is easy. What a bafoon.
..> .>
..> .
..> .OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?
..> .
..> .Just to clarify, I work for day use parks. The 'day' has nothing to do
..> .with sun's up or down. The day use means no overnight camping.
..>
..> Then why can't you call a spade a spade, and say so?
..>
..
..They DID say so. Day Use is a term the parks and forests use to denote that
..usage is not allowed over 24 hour periods,

"Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English language.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
9 out of 10 Mike Vandemans agree:

> "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English
> language. ===


It's one or the other, Mike. If they are misusing the term, then "Day Use"
means no camping. If this isn't a misuse, then it means daylight use only.
Since, by the nature of this post, you apparently believe the former, your
troll was completely pointless.

--
__ __ _ ___ ___
/ _|/ _/ |_ _|_ _|
\_ ( (( o | | | |
|__/\__\_/|_| |_|

[email protected]
 
Scott Burley <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> 9 out of 10 Mike Vandemans agree:
>
> > "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English
> > language. ===


The language is not being used wrong, the wording just has a bit of
ambiguity.

>
> It's one or the other, Mike. If they are misusing the term, then "Day Use"
> means no camping. If this isn't a misuse, then it means daylight use only.
> Since, by the nature of this post, you apparently believe the former, your
> troll was completely pointless.


As far as the USDA and DOI go, you will never get a "definition" of
Day-Use. A strict definition does not leave enough operational
latitude. The CFR that was cited earlier in this thread:

"The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Chapter II, Part 261.14
(e)"

Is a prohabition, not a definition.

CFR's form a frame work from which the rules of each unit are
developed. There is no single definition of "Day-Use" in the CFR's,
because it varies from park to park. That said, there also seems to be
a misinterpretaion that "occupying" = camping. This is not necessarily
so. Occupying means just that ... occupying. The wording gives
situational latitude to the L.E.'s.

FWIW, the last three parks that I worked at Blue Mesa, Grand Canyon,
and Glen Canyon, all had similar "definitions" for Day Use. Day Use
meant access was limited to specific hours, ~30 minutes before sunrise
to ~30 minutes after sunset. The specific times were always signed,
and occupancy of the area was interpretted to mean any activity (or
non-activity) beyond the open hours.

The built in ambiguity of CFR's is intentional ... just like the
ambiguity of the Constitution. Still, I have yet to see any unit in
the the USDA or DOI where Day-Use = Night Use, but I would love to see
a citation for it.

R
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:14:50 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]>

wrote:
>
> .
> ."Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> .news:[email protected]...
> .> On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:52:08 -0600, Paul Cassel <[email protected]> wrote:
> .>
> .> .Jeff Strickland wrote:
> .> .
> .> .>
> .> .> You are an idiot. BTW, many animals are attracted to people because

the
> .food
> .> .> is easy. What a bafoon.
> .> .>
> .> .
> .> .OK, now I'm confused. Is that buffoon or baboon?
> .> .
> .> .Just to clarify, I work for day use parks. The 'day' has nothing to do
> .> .with sun's up or down. The day use means no overnight camping.
> .>
> .> Then why can't you call a spade a spade, and say so?
> .>
> .
> .They DID say so. Day Use is a term the parks and forests use to denote

that
> .usage is not allowed over 24 hour periods,
>
> "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English

language.

The Board of Scholars over at the Cracker Jacks plant called, they want your
PhD back. You are too stupid to keep using the certificate they packed in
your box of Cracker Jacks. They asked me to ask you to mail it back
immediately.
 
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 05:17:30 GMT, Scott Burley <[email protected]> wrote:

..9 out of 10 Mike Vandemans agree:
..
..> "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English
..> language. ===
..
..It's one or the other, Mike. If they are misusing the term, then "Day Use"
..means no camping. If this isn't a misuse, then it means daylight use only.
..Since, by the nature of this post, you apparently believe the former, your
..troll was completely pointless.

Did you say something?
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
Sam Williams wrote:

>First off, IANAL, and this is all just my opinion..
>
>However, in this country (UK) the legal meanings of daytime and night-time
>seem to have no clear definition. However, most statutory guidance seems
>to have adopted something similar to the following definition of
>night-time: the period during which the adult population can reasonably be
>expected to be asleep, or is preparing for sleep.
>


can you please tell me what the definition of the word "is" is...? :)

TIA,
b.

--

* enjoying the karma *
remove LKJSDFJSD from address to email
 
>something similar to the following
>"bri719" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
> Sam Williams wrote:
>
> >First off, IANAL, and this is all just my opinion..
> >
> >However, in this country (UK) the legal meanings of daytime and

night-time
> >seem to have no clear definition. However, most statutory guidance seems
> >to night-time: the period during which the adult population can

reasonably be
> >expected to be asleep, or is preparing for sleep.
> >

>
> can you please tell me what the definition of the word "is" is...? :)
>
> TIA,
> b.
>
> --
>
> * enjoying the karma *
> remove LKJSDFJSD from address to email
>
>
 
On 10 Sep 2004 09:01:42 -0700, [email protected] (Reco Diver) wrote:

..Scott Burley <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
..> 9 out of 10 Mike Vandemans agree:
..>
..> > "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English
..> > language. ===
..
..The language is not being used wrong, the wording just has a bit of
..ambiguity.

No, it doesn't. We all know what "day" is.

..> It's one or the other, Mike. If they are misusing the term, then "Day Use"
..> means no camping. If this isn't a misuse, then it means daylight use only.
..> Since, by the nature of this post, you apparently believe the former, your
..> troll was completely pointless.
..
..As far as the USDA and DOI go, you will never get a "definition" of
..Day-Use. A strict definition does not leave enough operational
..latitude. The CFR that was cited earlier in this thread:
..
.. "The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Chapter II, Part 261.14
..(e)"
..
..Is a prohabition, not a definition.
..
..CFR's form a frame work from which the rules of each unit are
..developed. There is no single definition of "Day-Use" in the CFR's,
..because it varies from park to park. That said, there also seems to be
..a misinterpretaion that "occupying" = camping. This is not necessarily
..so. Occupying means just that ... occupying. The wording gives
..situational latitude to the L.E.'s.
..
..FWIW, the last three parks that I worked at Blue Mesa, Grand Canyon,
..and Glen Canyon, all had similar "definitions" for Day Use. Day Use
..meant access was limited to specific hours, ~30 minutes before sunrise
..to ~30 minutes after sunset. The specific times were always signed,
..and occupancy of the area was interpretted to mean any activity (or
..non-activity) beyond the open hours.
..
..The built in ambiguity of CFR's is intentional ... just like the
..ambiguity of the Constitution. Still, I have yet to see any unit in
..the the USDA or DOI where Day-Use = Night Use, but I would love to see
..a citation for it.
..
..R

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 10 Sep 2004 09:01:42 -0700, [email protected] (Reco Diver) wrote:
>
> .Scott Burley <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> .> 9 out of 10 Mike Vandemans agree:
> .>
> .> > "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English
> .> > language. ===
> .
> .The language is not being used wrong, the wording just has a bit of
> .ambiguity.
>
> No, it doesn't. We all know what "day" is.


What exactly is YOUR definition of day??

>
> .> It's one or the other, Mike. If they are misusing the term, then "Day
> Use"
> .> means no camping. If this isn't a misuse, then it means daylight use
> only.
> .> Since, by the nature of this post, you apparently believe the former,
> your
> .> troll was completely pointless.
> .
> .As far as the USDA and DOI go, you will never get a "definition" of
> .Day-Use. A strict definition does not leave enough operational
> .latitude. The CFR that was cited earlier in this thread:
> .
> . "The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Chapter II, Part 261.14
> .(e)"
> .
> .Is a prohabition, not a definition.
> .
> .CFR's form a frame work from which the rules of each unit are
> .developed. There is no single definition of "Day-Use" in the CFR's,
> .because it varies from park to park. That said, there also seems to be
> .a misinterpretaion that "occupying" = camping. This is not necessarily
> .so. Occupying means just that ... occupying. The wording gives
> .situational latitude to the L.E.'s.
> .
> .FWIW, the last three parks that I worked at Blue Mesa, Grand Canyon,
> .and Glen Canyon, all had similar "definitions" for Day Use. Day Use
> .meant access was limited to specific hours, ~30 minutes before sunrise
> .to ~30 minutes after sunset. The specific times were always signed,
> .and occupancy of the area was interpretted to mean any activity (or
> .non-activity) beyond the open hours.
> .
> .The built in ambiguity of CFR's is intentional ... just like the
> .ambiguity of the Constitution. Still, I have yet to see any unit in
> .the the USDA or DOI where Day-Use = Night Use, but I would love to see
> .a citation for it.
> .
> .R
>
> ===
> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
> humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 06:36:10 GMT, "Rosco" <[email protected]> wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
..news:[email protected]...
..> On 10 Sep 2004 09:01:42 -0700, [email protected] (Reco Diver) wrote:
..>
..> .Scott Burley <[email protected]> wrote in message
..> news:<[email protected]>...
..> .> 9 out of 10 Mike Vandemans agree:
..> .>
..> .> > "Day Use" means use during the daytime. They are misusing the English
..> .> > language. ===
..> .
..> .The language is not being used wrong, the wording just has a bit of
..> .ambiguity.
..>
..> No, it doesn't. We all know what "day" is.
..
..What exactly is YOUR definition of day??

Same as Webster's. When the sun is shining.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
hahahahahaha...

I'll be sure not to MTB when the sun is not shining! just priceless.
anyone have a pic of that Ph.D in basket weaving?

bri


Mike Vandeman wrote:

>
>Same as Webster's. When the sun is shining.
>===
>I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
>humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
>years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
>
>http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
>
>