So you see it as binary, someone lacks the fitness and no aero advantage will help or someone has all the fitness they need and the aero difference isn't meaningful. I see it as a continuum and at least some riders getting repeatedly gapped till they get dropped would do better with every advantage they can get and by riding tall while fighting the wind at speed they're just making a hard job harder....Yes and no. You seem to be advocating using them...well..your example of not having the engine baffles me. If you don't have the engine and are off the back, we could ride with our aero ass facing forward and not get back on. Same with going off the front. If you don't make your power down low or breath as well down low it's going to be a short, fruitless and wasted effort...
Originally Posted by alienator .
As usual, AOG is wrong.
Originally Posted by ambal .
Do you even ride a bike?
I guess enough people posted that I don't need to defend my position.
This may be very possible. I will recommend in complete seriousness, that when in mid-pack (like our friend Francisco above), one should remain on the hoods in order to see what's going on around them, and to facilitate Dave's good will in mention of keeping that rubber side down.Originally Posted by daveryanwyoming .
I guess any rational discussion in this thread has run its course.
Originally Posted by Dave Pace .
milk.... It does a body...........
Field positioning is important!
It's the future me in 4 years... but of course, I'm much better looking.Originally Posted by oldbobcat .
Didn't this guy win the Giro once, and hold the hour record for a few years?
I think if Laurent Fignon were around, he'd challenge that statement about the guy winning the Giro.oldbobcat said:Didn't this guy win the Giro once, and hold the hour record for a few years?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.