Innocent until proven guilty...

[gabriel faure]

Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
innocent from having leaked information to the media!

Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?

On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?

 

"gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a écrit dans
le message de news: [email protected]...
> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>
> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>
> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?

Yes, correct
It is just one side, it seems.

 

[Keith]

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:30:27 +0200, <Montesquiou> wrote:

>
>"gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a écrit dans
>le message de news: [email protected]...
>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>
>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>
>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>
>Yes, correct
>It is just one side, it seems.

The side of the cheaters

 

[matabala]

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a écrit
> dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>
>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>
>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>
> Yes, correct
> It is just one side, it seems.
>
>
Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.

 

"matabala" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email protected]...
>
> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a écrit
>> dans le message de news:
>> [email protected]...
>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is totally
>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>
>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>
>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>
>> Yes, correct
>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>
>>
> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>

What are you talking about ?

To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
As I know.
To you

 

[Phil Holman]

<Montesquiou> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "matabala" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>>
>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a
>>> écrit dans le message de news:
>>> [email protected]...
>>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>>>> totally
>>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>>
>>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>>
>>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>>
>>> Yes, correct
>>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>>
>>>
>> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>>
>
> What are you talking about ?
>
> To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
> As I know.
> To you
But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
proven so what do you call that?

Phil H

 

"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email protected]...
>
> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "matabala" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
>> [email protected]...
>>>
>>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a écrit
>>>> dans le message de news:
>>>> [email protected]...
>>>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>>>>> totally
>>>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>>>
>>>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>>>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, correct
>>>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>>>
>>
>> What are you talking about ?
>>
>> To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
>> As I know.
>> To you
> But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
> proven so what do you call that?
>

I call it the result of the 1999 test.

> Phil H
>

 

[RonSonic]

On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:04:47 +0200, <Montesquiou> wrote:

>
>"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> a écrit dans le message de news:
>[email protected]...
>>
>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "matabala" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>> [email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a écrit
>>>>> dans le message de news:
>>>>> [email protected]...
>>>>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>>>>>> totally
>>>>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body contains
>>>>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, correct
>>>>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What are you talking about ?
>>>
>>> To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
>>> As I know.
>>> To you
>> But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
>> proven so what do you call that?
>>
>
>I call it the result of the 1999 test.

There was no 1999 test.

Ron

 

[Phil Holman]

"RonSonic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:04:47 +0200, <Montesquiou> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Phil Holman" <piholmanc@yourservice> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>[email protected]...
>>>
>>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "matabala" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
>>>> [email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> <Montesquiou> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "gabriel faure" <[email protected]> a
>>>>>> écrit
>>>>>> dans le message de news:
>>>>>> [email protected]...
>>>>>>> Yes, the French National Anti-Doping Lab at Chatenay-Malabry is
>>>>>>> totally
>>>>>>> innocent from having leaked information to the media!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can anybody bring evidence against the French lab? No?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the contrary, evidence has been given that Landis' body
>>>>>>> contains
>>>>>>> exogenous testosterone. Can you challenged this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, correct
>>>>>> It is just one side, it seems.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Happy to have you but keep your chauvinism to yourselves svp.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What are you talking about ?
>>>>
>>>> To say that a Lab is innocent until proven guilty is not Chauvinism
>>>> As I know.
>>>> To you
>>> But you have inferred that LA is guilty of cheating without it being
>>> proven so what do you call that?
>>>
>>
>>I call it the result of the 1999 test.
>
> There was no 1999 test.

He's referring to the "boil on the bum" topical application of
corticosteroid triamcinolone.

Phil H