Michael MacClancy <
[email protected]> wrote:
> "marc" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
>
news:1fpjsq1.i2oh9b1ms3u5jN%[email protected]...
> > Michael MacClancy <
[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > "marc" <
[email protected]> wrote > Being charged can't be a miscarriage of justice
> > > and as he pleaded guilty
> > > > neither can the deciscion.
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, what is it then when you plead guilty to a non-existent offence?
> >
> > Stupidity?
> >
> > > It doesn't sound like a fair carriage of justice to me.
> >
> > That's because you make the mistake of thinking that an offence was committed, simply because
> > something has happened that somone was charged with. It's only an proved to be an offence when
> > the verdict has been given.
> >
> >
> snip
> >
> > --
> > Marc T Shirts, Sweatshirts, polo shirts, banners, signs,decals, stickers etc for clubs and
> > associations of all types
http://www.jaceeprint.demon.co.uk/
>
> Hey, you wash your typing fingers with carbolic soap or something. If you'd read what I wrote and
> not what you wanted to read you'd have seen that I haven't mistakenly thought anything.
Then if it wasn't a mistake I can oly believe that you don't understand what your talking about . It
impossible to be guilty of a " non-existent offence" as soon as the guilty verdict arrives it shows
that the offence existed.
>
> It might be "stupidity" to plead guilty to a non-existent offence but some people are easily
> intimidated or conned.
>
> In everyday language it's obviously a miscarriage of justice if someone is found guilty of a
> non-existent offence.
No, it's impossible.
--
Marc T Shirts, Sweatshirts, polo shirts, banners, signs,decals, stickers etc for clubs and
associations of all types
http://www.jaceeprint.demon.co.uk/