Trekker2017 said:Just out of curiosity: What would Bush have had to have done to have succeeded for you?
From where I sit, I see a man who is using his positon of power to extend American hegemony over people who were/and still are antagonistic to us. We have troops in Afganistan, Iraq and now we are threatening Iran and North Korea. If part of his agenda is to extend American power and grab oil rights for his cronies... he ain't doin' so bad. We've only just managed to slow him from grabbing some very pristine Alaskan lands for his oil buddies, but that won't last for long.
Well there are two areas where I think Bush has failed in his Presidency.
1.The war on terrorism
2 The USA economy.
Instead of concentrating on capturing Al Qaeda, Bush instead launched an illegal war in Iraq.
Frankly, I think Bush realised quite early on that he could never beat Al Qaeda and to divert attention from this, he decided to launch a war in Iraq.
Let me be clear, I supported the war in Afghanistan - the Taliban were harbouring Al Qaeda and thus they had to be removed.
He also managed to disenfranchise everyone of his traditional allies in Europe and this disenfranchisement is being reaped as we speak.
Time is running out in Iraq and if the US doesn't play it right, what has gone since March 19th 2003, will seem to be a cakewalk.
As regards the US economy, i think that Bush has created structural problems
in the US economy.
The growing US beudget deficit, the growing trade deficit, the loss of confidence in the US dollar, are all symptomatic of a President who has been
at best incompetent.
The US has actually lost jobs since Bush took office.
The US economy imports far more than it exports.
US manufacturing is slowly being whittled away by foreign competition.
The growing budget deficit - and remember the US still has to fund the Iraq war and make reparations to Iraq - will result in a massive tax liability for US taxpayers.