Re: "Mountain biking is no more damaging than other forms of recreation, including hiking."



"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "cc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> "di" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:Zzkmg.10240$FR1.4578@dukeread05...
>>>
>>>>"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>The one and only thing his like ever understands is a good swift kick
>>>>>in the ass. That is what I am here for.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Like I've said before, name the time and place.
>>>
>>>
>>> I suggest dueling pistols at dawn down by the riverside on the banks of
>>> the Ohio. I will try to get Tom Sherman to be my second, but he has made
>>> himself scarce of late and I don't know if I can find him. No doubt, you
>>> have some scofflaws you could spare who could be my second if I am
>>> unable to get Tom Sherman.
>>>
>>> It is extremely important that all of this be done with the utmost
>>> honor, as that is the only thing that matters to me at my present stage
>>> of life. I will expect you to be dressed in your best formal attire as
>>> will I. I think 10 paces will be about right as my eyesight is not what
>>> it used to be. I think we should also use black powder firearms in order
>>> to enhance the dignity of the occasion. I will go down to the local pawn
>>> shop and see what I can find.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, Ed. That's funny. You're not much of an arguer, but you are a decent
>> clown.
>
> At last ... someone to appreciate me! We clowns are desperate for a
> little feed back from time to time. Instead all I get from these freaking
> newsgroups are serious types who take me seriously. Of course, sometimes I
> am serious, but mostly I am not. It is really strange how so many do not
> seem to know how to read me. However, it may be my fault. I will have to
> work on my writing skills more.
>
While you are there (pawn shop), see if they sell red, puff noses. If you
are going to accept the title "clown", you might as well dress the part.
We don't know how to read you because, by your own admission, you have had
the human contact of a mole. You can't hit someone with a stick then jump
back and proclaim "that was funny, wasn't it?". A sense of humor is
developed around people, not buried in a dusty corner of a library.
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:zhAmg.10317$FR1.3@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "cc" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>> "di" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:Zzkmg.10240$FR1.4578@dukeread05...
>>>>
>>>>>"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>>>The one and only thing his like ever understands is a good swift kick
>>>>>>in the ass. That is what I am here for.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Like I've said before, name the time and place.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suggest dueling pistols at dawn down by the riverside on the banks of
>>>> the Ohio. I will try to get Tom Sherman to be my second, but he has
>>>> made himself scarce of late and I don't know if I can find him. No
>>>> doubt, you have some scofflaws you could spare who could be my second
>>>> if I am unable to get Tom Sherman.
>>>>
>>>> It is extremely important that all of this be done with the utmost
>>>> honor, as that is the only thing that matters to me at my present stage
>>>> of life. I will expect you to be dressed in your best formal attire as
>>>> will I. I think 10 paces will be about right as my eyesight is not what
>>>> it used to be. I think we should also use black powder firearms in
>>>> order to enhance the dignity of the occasion. I will go down to the
>>>> local pawn shop and see what I can find.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, Ed. That's funny. You're not much of an arguer, but you are a decent
>>> clown.
>>
>> At last ... someone to appreciate me! We clowns are desperate for a
>> little feed back from time to time. Instead all I get from these freaking
>> newsgroups are serious types who take me seriously. Of course, sometimes
>> I am serious, but mostly I am not. It is really strange how so many do
>> not seem to know how to read me. However, it may be my fault. I will have
>> to work on my writing skills more.
>>
> While you are there (pawn shop), see if they sell red, puff noses. If you
> are going to accept the title "clown", you might as well dress the part.
> We don't know how to read you because, by your own admission, you have had
> the human contact of a mole. You can't hit someone with a stick then jump
> back and proclaim "that was funny, wasn't it?". A sense of humor is
> developed around people, not buried in a dusty corner of a library.

Humor is a very difficult thing to define. What is often funny to one person
will not be in the least bit funny to another person. Most humor is of the
slapstick variety, crude and dumb (Jerry Lewis). That can never appeal to
types like me.

By the way, once you have to explain humor, it is no longer humorous. That
is why I do not put smileys all over my posts. I want folks to get it on
their own. Am I being serious or not? Sometimes I do not even know. I depend
on others to tell me.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Chris Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:p[email protected]:
>
>>
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>
>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following
>>>> newsgroups from your posts:
>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>
>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I
>>> hit reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden
>>> discussion, then say something interesting! But do NOT come to me to
>>> fix your blunder. I read your silly apologetic drivel about making
>>> ARBR more lively... You were surprised about the focused interest
>>> in the NGs? Why do you thing they have different titles? Hanging with
>>> Vandeman has dumbed you down, dude!
>>
>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are pitiful
>> in the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel anymore on
>> ARBR and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>
>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I
>> will continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No one
>> gives a damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there but
>> blooming idiots. [...]
>
>
> Who the hell are you to tell others what they can and cannot do?
>
> It was you and/or Vandy who does all the cross posting, why don't you
> follow your own advice?

Some cross posting will involve a half dozen newsgroups. This is almost
always wrong. However, there can be some cross posting to one or two other
newsgroups from time to time. For instance, these threads on mountain biking
on hiking trails seem to belong to AMB and RBS, but not to ARBR and RBM.
What is there about this that you do not understand?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ZaAmg.10315$FR1.6318@dukeread05...
>
> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:p[email protected]...
>>
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>
>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following newsgroups
>>>> from your posts:
>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>
>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I hit
>>> reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden discussion,
>>> then say something interesting! But do NOT come to me to fix your
>>> blunder. I read your silly apologetic drivel about making ARBR more
>>> lively... You were surprised about the focused interest in the NGs?
>>> Why do you thing they have different titles? Hanging with Vandeman has
>>> dumbed you down, dude!
>>
>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are pitiful in
>> the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel anymore on ARBR
>> and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>
>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I will
>> continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No one gives a
>> damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there but blooming
>> idiots.
>> [...]

> What a pathetic little worm! The only reason any of my posts went to the
> NGs you mention is because YOU directed them there! I am NOT going to pick
> up after you or address your silly demands about my posts. Your opinion of
> people who frequent AMB is meaningless. Besides, they all kicked your ass
> on an intellectual level, a smart-ass level and an interest level. Just as
> they've done with MV for over 10 years.

I have explained in a previous post on another thread what was being
attempted and that it failed. Now, you need to go back to your freaking lair
and confine yourself to your fellow idiots on AMB. Frankly, I do not even
like you on RBS as you just spout the same old nonsense over and over.

How the hell could a bunch of idiots on AMB ever kick anyone's asses but
their own - and yours. That group is completely off my radar. I wish you
would get over there and stay there with all your ilk. You do not belong on
RBS. You are ruining that newsgourp with your confounded idiocies. Stay on
AMB why don't you!

> You came out with your self-important, "sacred trail" nonsense with, what
> is apparent now, an agenda of inflaming the topic. You crawled back to
> ARBR with some whining apology about cross-posting and making things "more
> lively".

There was no one else on ARBR or RBM that was interested in your ****. You
are a nothing but one long monologue of tedium. You should read your own
messages sometime. One thing is for sure, no one else is reading them. Have
you not noticed how Vandeman just gives you a one-liner retort and then like
an idiot you go on and on. I said it before and I will say it again, there
is something wrong with the way your brain works.

> I only posted you to begin with because you filtered Vandy's opinions and
> added your own **** on top. Vandeman is f*****g dangerous to the
> environmental movement by splintering discussion, making false claims,
> setting himself as an authority and accomplishing NOTHING! When I and
> others point this out, it is only for the purpose of making sure anyone
> looking for real information will have a constant reminder in their search
> of his usenet posts, his tactics and his lies. They all show up in a
> general search on Yahoo and Google and anyone seeking reference on him
> will find them.

All of the above is nothing but crazy Curtiss ****. There is no one who is
going to give any credence to anything that is said by anyone on Usenet.
Curtiss is the dumbest of the dumb. In fact, he is so dumb that I am
starting to feel sorry for him. One thing is for sure, he only belongs on
AMB where he can consort with his own kind.

> As for you - you are a lonely old ******* who has built a house of
> convenience around yourself. You put off everything in life that matters
> and rationalize it away to fit your pathetic existence.
> And I see you took your own initiative and clipped the other groups. Good!
> You put them there in the first place.
> You may think I'm "pitiful".... It means nothing coming from conan the
> librarian.
> You have accomplished one thing. You ****** me off. Thanks for nothing.

Yes, many thanks for commenting yet once again on my Greatness! I know I am
remarkable in every way, but please, temper your remarks as I am easily
embarrassed by too much praise. After all, modesty is next to Godliness.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "Chris Foster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:p[email protected]:
>>
>>>
>>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>>
>>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following
>>>>> newsgroups from your posts:
>>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>>
>>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I
>>>> hit reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden
>>>> discussion, then say something interesting! But do NOT come to me
>>>> to fix your blunder. I read your silly apologetic drivel about
>>>> making ARBR more lively... You were surprised about the focused
>>>> interest in the NGs? Why do you thing they have different titles?
>>>> Hanging with Vandeman has dumbed you down, dude!
>>>
>>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are
>>> pitiful in the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel
>>> anymore on ARBR and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>>
>>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I
>>> will continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No
>>> one gives a damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there
>>> but blooming idiots. [...]
>>
>>
>> Who the hell are you to tell others what they can and cannot do?
>>
>> It was you and/or Vandy who does all the cross posting, why don't you
>> follow your own advice?
>
> Some cross posting will involve a half dozen newsgroups. This is
> almost always wrong. However, there can be some cross posting to one
> or two other newsgroups from time to time. For instance, these threads
> on mountain biking on hiking trails seem to belong to AMB and RBS, but
> not to ARBR and RBM. What is there about this that you do not
> understand?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
>
>

You are a hypocrite, you and Vandy are the ones cross posting. Then you
tell everyone to not cross post. I understand very clearly. I also
understand very clearly that you are a hypocrite.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>> While you are there (pawn shop), see if they sell red, puff noses. If
>> you are going to accept the title "clown", you might as well dress the
>> part.
>> We don't know how to read you because, by your own admission, you have
>> had the human contact of a mole. You can't hit someone with a stick then
>> jump back and proclaim "that was funny, wasn't it?". A sense of humor is
>> developed around people, not buried in a dusty corner of a library.
>
> Humor is a very difficult thing to define. What is often funny to one
> person will not be in the least bit funny to another person. Most humor is
> of the slapstick variety, crude and dumb (Jerry Lewis). That can never
> appeal to types like me.
>
> By the way, once you have to explain humor, it is no longer humorous. That
> is why I do not put smileys all over my posts. I want folks to get it on
> their own. Am I being serious or not? Sometimes I do not even know. I
> depend on others to tell me.

Then listen up... If you don't know when you post it, we certainly aren't
going to know when we see it.
You either have the intent of being funny, or the intent of being serious.
Deciding which it was based on the response after the fact is stupid.
>
 
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:ZaAmg.10315$FR1.6318@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:p[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>>
>>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following
>>>>> newsgroups from your posts:
>>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>>
>>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I hit
>>>> reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden discussion,
>>>> then say something interesting! But do NOT come to me to fix your
>>>> blunder. I read your silly apologetic drivel about making ARBR more
>>>> lively... You were surprised about the focused interest in the NGs?
>>>> Why do you thing they have different titles? Hanging with Vandeman has
>>>> dumbed you down, dude!
>>>
>>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are pitiful in
>>> the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel anymore on ARBR
>>> and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>>
>>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I will
>>> continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No one gives a
>>> damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there but blooming
>>> idiots.
>>> [...]
>
>> What a pathetic little worm! The only reason any of my posts went to the
>> NGs you mention is because YOU directed them there! I am NOT going to
>> pick up after you or address your silly demands about my posts. Your
>> opinion of people who frequent AMB is meaningless. Besides, they all
>> kicked your ass on an intellectual level, a smart-ass level and an
>> interest level. Just as they've done with MV for over 10 years.
>
> I have explained in a previous post on another thread what was being
> attempted and that it failed. Now, you need to go back to your freaking
> lair and confine yourself to your fellow idiots on AMB. Frankly, I do not
> even like you on RBS as you just spout the same old nonsense over and
> over.
A: I don't care what you like.
B: Your attempt failed. I wasn't the idiot who cross-posted to unnecessary
groups attempting to create non-content in specifically titled NGs only to
satisfy some yearning for attention.
C: I don't need to "go" anywhere.
>
> How the hell could a bunch of idiots on AMB ever kick anyone's asses but
> their own - and yours. That group is completely off my radar. I wish you
> would get over there and stay there with all your ilk. You do not belong
> on RBS. You are ruining that newsgourp with your confounded idiocies. Stay
> on AMB why don't you!
Apparently, it was YOU that opened the gates for the posts to show there in
the first place. Besides, Vandy has been posting to MB, SOC, SCI, CA &
ENVIRON for years.... When I hit "reply", the message goes where the
headers address it to.
Your opinion of my posts is not a filter for determining qualification.
Yours certainly handle "on topic" like a fish on a unicycle - so what makes
your "off-topic" any more special than any others?
>
>> You came out with your self-important, "sacred trail" nonsense with, what
>> is apparent now, an agenda of inflaming the topic. You crawled back to
>> ARBR with some whining apology about cross-posting and making things
>> "more lively".
>
> There was no one else on ARBR or RBM that was interested in your ****. You
> are a nothing but one long monologue of tedium. You should read your own
> messages sometime. One thing is for sure, no one else is reading them.
> Have you not noticed how Vandeman just gives you a one-liner retort and
> then like an idiot you go on and on. I said it before and I will say it
> again, there is something wrong with the way your brain works.
Then why did you direct them there in the first place?
Here's an invitation to stop reading if you find my responses beyond your
comprehension. Why tax your brain needlessly, little man?
>
>> I only posted you to begin with because you filtered Vandy's opinions and
>> added your own **** on top. Vandeman is f*****g dangerous to the
>> environmental movement by splintering discussion, making false claims,
>> setting himself as an authority and accomplishing NOTHING! When I and
>> others point this out, it is only for the purpose of making sure anyone
>> looking for real information will have a constant reminder in their
>> search of his usenet posts, his tactics and his lies. They all show up in
>> a general search on Yahoo and Google and anyone seeking reference on him
>> will find them.
>
> All of the above is nothing but crazy Curtiss ****. There is no one who is
> going to give any credence to anything that is said by anyone on Usenet.
> Curtiss is the dumbest of the dumb. In fact, he is so dumb that I am
> starting to feel sorry for him. One thing is for sure, he only belongs on
> AMB where he can consort with his own kind.
Since usenet has, as you say, no credibility... then "ed dolan (conan the
librarian)" has no credibility since this is where your time, and mind, is
spent.
So... your opinion of the matter is useless on either side.
>
>> As for you - you are a lonely old ******* who has built a house of
>> convenience around yourself. You put off everything in life that matters
>> and rationalize it away to fit your pathetic existence.
>> And I see you took your own initiative and clipped the other groups.
>> Good! You put them there in the first place.
>> You may think I'm "pitiful".... It means nothing coming from conan the
>> librarian.
>> You have accomplished one thing. You ****** me off. Thanks for nothing.
>
> Yes, many thanks for commenting yet once again on my Greatness! I know I
> am remarkable in every way, but please, temper your remarks as I am easily
> embarrassed by too much praise. After all, modesty is next to Godliness.

Anyone have any toilet paper...? Someone dropped a load of **** over here.
 
Retitling the header is hysterical, coming from you - after posting in
appreciation of people who have strung wire on trails, set traps for
cyclists and post cyclists' injuries with apparent joy.
Hypocritical Vandy, as usual.
 
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:12:56 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:57:36 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>It is extremely important that all of this be done with the utmost honor,
>>
>> Please don't ever use "honor" and "mountain biker" in the same
>> sentence. I don't want to gag.
>>
>You should be used to it - after choking out your nonsense for years.
>Your OPINION of off-road cycling is not a filter for determining the
>character of those involved.

Ask your mommy to look up "filter" in the dictionary. Then learn how
to use it properly. Idiot.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:11:14 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:p[email protected]...
>>
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>
>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>
>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following newsgroups
>>>> from your posts:
>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>
>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I hit
>>> reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden discussion, then
>>> say something interesting! But do NOT come to me to fix your blunder. I
>>> read your silly apologetic drivel about making ARBR more lively... You
>>> were surprised about the focused interest in the NGs? Why do you thing
>>> they have different titles? Hanging with Vandeman has dumbed you down,
>>> dude!
>>
>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are pitiful in
>> the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel anymore on ARBR
>> and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>
>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I will
>> continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No one gives a
>> damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there but blooming idiots.
>> [...]
>What a pathetic little worm! The only reason any of my posts went to the NGs
>you mention is because YOU directed them there! I am NOT going to pick up
>after you or address your silly demands about my posts. Your opinion of
>people who frequent AMB is meaningless. Besides, they all kicked your ass on
>an intellectual level, a smart-ass level and an interest level. Just as
>they've done with MV for over 10 years.
>You came out with your self-important, "sacred trail" nonsense with, what is
>apparent now, an agenda of inflaming the topic. You crawled back to ARBR
>with some whining apology about cross-posting and making things "more
>lively".
>I only posted you to begin with because you filtered Vandy's opinions and
>added your own **** on top. Vandeman is f*****g dangerous to the
>environmental movement by splintering discussion, making false claims,
>setting himself as an authority and accomplishing NOTHING! When I and others
>point this out, it is only for the purpose of making sure anyone looking for
>real information will have a constant reminder in their search of his usenet
>posts, his tactics and his lies. They all show up in a general search on
>Yahoo and Google and anyone seeking reference on him will find them.
>As for you - you are a lonely old ******* who has built a house of
>convenience around yourself. You put off everything in life that matters and
>rationalize it away to fit your pathetic existence.
>And I see you took your own initiative and clipped the other groups. Good!
>You put them there in the first place.
>You may think I'm "pitiful".... It means nothing coming from conan the
>librarian.
>You have accomplished one thing. You ****** me off. Thanks for nothing.

Did someone say something?
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:38:07 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:ZaAmg.10315$FR1.6318@dukeread05...
>>
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:p[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>>
>>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following newsgroups
>>>>> from your posts:
>>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>>
>>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I hit
>>>> reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden discussion,
>>>> then say something interesting! But do NOT come to me to fix your
>>>> blunder. I read your silly apologetic drivel about making ARBR more
>>>> lively... You were surprised about the focused interest in the NGs?
>>>> Why do you thing they have different titles? Hanging with Vandeman has
>>>> dumbed you down, dude!
>>>
>>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are pitiful in
>>> the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel anymore on ARBR
>>> and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>>
>>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I will
>>> continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No one gives a
>>> damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there but blooming
>>> idiots.
>>> [...]
>
>> What a pathetic little worm! The only reason any of my posts went to the
>> NGs you mention is because YOU directed them there! I am NOT going to pick
>> up after you or address your silly demands about my posts. Your opinion of
>> people who frequent AMB is meaningless. Besides, they all kicked your ass
>> on an intellectual level, a smart-ass level and an interest level. Just as
>> they've done with MV for over 10 years.
>
>I have explained in a previous post on another thread what was being
>attempted and that it failed. Now, you need to go back to your freaking lair
>and confine yourself to your fellow idiots on AMB. Frankly, I do not even
>like you on RBS as you just spout the same old nonsense over and over.
>
>How the hell could a bunch of idiots on AMB ever kick anyone's asses but
>their own - and yours. That group is completely off my radar. I wish you
>would get over there and stay there with all your ilk. You do not belong on
>RBS. You are ruining that newsgourp with your confounded idiocies. Stay on
>AMB why don't you!
>
>> You came out with your self-important, "sacred trail" nonsense with, what
>> is apparent now, an agenda of inflaming the topic. You crawled back to
>> ARBR with some whining apology about cross-posting and making things "more
>> lively".
>
>There was no one else on ARBR or RBM that was interested in your ****. You
>are a nothing but one long monologue of tedium. You should read your own
>messages sometime. One thing is for sure, no one else is reading them. Have
>you not noticed how Vandeman just gives you a one-liner retort and then like
>an idiot you go on and on.

Shhh! It keeps him out of the woods.

I said it before and I will say it again, there
>is something wrong with the way your brain works.
>
>> I only posted you to begin with because you filtered Vandy's opinions and
>> added your own **** on top. Vandeman is f*****g dangerous to the
>> environmental movement by splintering discussion, making false claims,
>> setting himself as an authority and accomplishing NOTHING! When I and
>> others point this out, it is only for the purpose of making sure anyone
>> looking for real information will have a constant reminder in their search
>> of his usenet posts, his tactics and his lies. They all show up in a
>> general search on Yahoo and Google and anyone seeking reference on him
>> will find them.
>
>All of the above is nothing but crazy Curtiss ****. There is no one who is
>going to give any credence to anything that is said by anyone on Usenet.
>Curtiss is the dumbest of the dumb. In fact, he is so dumb that I am
>starting to feel sorry for him. One thing is for sure, he only belongs on
>AMB where he can consort with his own kind.
>
>> As for you - you are a lonely old ******* who has built a house of
>> convenience around yourself. You put off everything in life that matters
>> and rationalize it away to fit your pathetic existence.
>> And I see you took your own initiative and clipped the other groups. Good!
>> You put them there in the first place.
>> You may think I'm "pitiful".... It means nothing coming from conan the
>> librarian.
>> You have accomplished one thing. You ****** me off. Thanks for nothing.
>
>Yes, many thanks for commenting yet once again on my Greatness! I know I am
>remarkable in every way, but please, temper your remarks as I am easily
>embarrassed by too much praise. After all, modesty is next to Godliness.

This post is headed straight to the Smithsonian. Genius in action....

>Regards,
>
>Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>aka
>Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:34:34 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:ZaAmg.10315$FR1.6318@dukeread05...
>>>
>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:p[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:aqfmg.10198$FR1.7663@dukeread05...
>>>>
>>>> [newsgroups trimmed]
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Curtiss, I would like you and Vandeman to trim the following
>>>>>> newsgroups from your posts:
>>>>>> rec.bicycles.misc, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent
>>>>
>>>>> WTF... Why did you add them in the first place? I never did... I hit
>>>>> reply and send. If you want to change usenet and broaden discussion,
>>>>> then say something interesting! But do NOT come to me to fix your
>>>>> blunder. I read your silly apologetic drivel about making ARBR more
>>>>> lively... You were surprised about the focused interest in the NGs?
>>>>> Why do you thing they have different titles? Hanging with Vandeman has
>>>>> dumbed you down, dude!
>>>>
>>>> Curtiss, you are doing nothing but stalking Vandeman. You are pitiful in
>>>> the extreme. We surely do not want your constant drivel anymore on ARBR
>>>> and RBM. You are not up to our high standards.
>>>>
>>>> I repeat, do not post anymore to these newsgroups, ARBR and RBM. I will
>>>> continue to monitor RBS and will pick up your **** there. No one gives a
>>>> damn what is posted to AMB since no one resides there but blooming
>>>> idiots.
>>>> [...]
>>
>>> What a pathetic little worm! The only reason any of my posts went to the
>>> NGs you mention is because YOU directed them there! I am NOT going to
>>> pick up after you or address your silly demands about my posts. Your
>>> opinion of people who frequent AMB is meaningless. Besides, they all
>>> kicked your ass on an intellectual level, a smart-ass level and an
>>> interest level. Just as they've done with MV for over 10 years.
>>
>> I have explained in a previous post on another thread what was being
>> attempted and that it failed. Now, you need to go back to your freaking
>> lair and confine yourself to your fellow idiots on AMB. Frankly, I do not
>> even like you on RBS as you just spout the same old nonsense over and
>> over.
>A: I don't care what you like.
>B: Your attempt failed. I wasn't the idiot who cross-posted to unnecessary
>groups attempting to create non-content in specifically titled NGs only to
>satisfy some yearning for attention.
>C: I don't need to "go" anywhere.
>>
>> How the hell could a bunch of idiots on AMB ever kick anyone's asses but
>> their own - and yours. That group is completely off my radar. I wish you
>> would get over there and stay there with all your ilk. You do not belong
>> on RBS. You are ruining that newsgourp with your confounded idiocies. Stay
>> on AMB why don't you!
>Apparently, it was YOU that opened the gates for the posts to show there in
>the first place. Besides, Vandy has been posting to MB, SOC, SCI, CA &
>ENVIRON for years.... When I hit "reply", the message goes where the
>headers address it to.
>Your opinion of my posts is not a filter for determining qualification.
>Yours certainly handle "on topic" like a fish on a unicycle - so what makes
>your "off-topic" any more special than any others?
>>
>>> You came out with your self-important, "sacred trail" nonsense with, what
>>> is apparent now, an agenda of inflaming the topic. You crawled back to
>>> ARBR with some whining apology about cross-posting and making things
>>> "more lively".
>>
>> There was no one else on ARBR or RBM that was interested in your ****. You
>> are a nothing but one long monologue of tedium. You should read your own
>> messages sometime. One thing is for sure, no one else is reading them.
>> Have you not noticed how Vandeman just gives you a one-liner retort and
>> then like an idiot you go on and on. I said it before and I will say it
>> again, there is something wrong with the way your brain works.
>Then why did you direct them there in the first place?
>Here's an invitation to stop reading if you find my responses beyond your
>comprehension. Why tax your brain needlessly, little man?
>>
>>> I only posted you to begin with because you filtered Vandy's opinions and
>>> added your own **** on top. Vandeman is f*****g dangerous to the
>>> environmental movement by splintering discussion, making false claims,
>>> setting himself as an authority and accomplishing NOTHING! When I and
>>> others point this out, it is only for the purpose of making sure anyone
>>> looking for real information will have a constant reminder in their
>>> search of his usenet posts, his tactics and his lies. They all show up in
>>> a general search on Yahoo and Google and anyone seeking reference on him
>>> will find them.
>>
>> All of the above is nothing but crazy Curtiss ****. There is no one who is
>> going to give any credence to anything that is said by anyone on Usenet.
>> Curtiss is the dumbest of the dumb. In fact, he is so dumb that I am
>> starting to feel sorry for him. One thing is for sure, he only belongs on
>> AMB where he can consort with his own kind.
>Since usenet has, as you say, no credibility... then "ed dolan (conan the
>librarian)" has no credibility since this is where your time, and mind, is
>spent.
>So... your opinion of the matter is useless on either side.
>>
>>> As for you - you are a lonely old ******* who has built a house of
>>> convenience around yourself. You put off everything in life that matters
>>> and rationalize it away to fit your pathetic existence.
>>> And I see you took your own initiative and clipped the other groups.
>>> Good! You put them there in the first place.
>>> You may think I'm "pitiful".... It means nothing coming from conan the
>>> librarian.
>>> You have accomplished one thing. You ****** me off. Thanks for nothing.
>>
>> Yes, many thanks for commenting yet once again on my Greatness! I know I
>> am remarkable in every way, but please, temper your remarks as I am easily
>> embarrassed by too much praise. After all, modesty is next to Godliness.
>
>Anyone have any toilet paper...? Someone dropped a load of **** over here.

.... something you just can't RESIST commenting on, like a dog that has
to sniff every round brown object he can find.... Baiting you is the
easiest thing in the world.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:12:56 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:57:36 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>It is extremely important that all of this be done with the utmost
>>>>honor,
>>>
>>> Please don't ever use "honor" and "mountain biker" in the same
>>> sentence. I don't want to gag.
>>>
>>You should be used to it - after choking out your nonsense for years.
>>Your OPINION of off-road cycling is not a filter for determining the
>>character of those involved.
>
> Ask your mommy to look up "filter" in the dictionary. Then learn how
> to use it properly. Idiot.

Character assasination rather than addressing the concept. Typical.
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:zMWmg.13607$FR1.10276@dukeread05...
> Retitling the header is hysterical, coming from you - after posting in
> appreciation of people who have strung wire on trails, set traps for
> cyclists and post cyclists' injuries with apparent joy.
> Hypocritical Vandy, as usual.
Your silence here speaks volumes
 
"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:34:34 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>> Yes, many thanks for commenting yet once again on my Greatness! I know I
>>> am remarkable in every way, but please, temper your remarks as I am
>>> easily
>>> embarrassed by too much praise. After all, modesty is next to Godliness.
>>
>>Anyone have any toilet paper...? Someone dropped a load of **** over here.
>
> ... something you just can't RESIST commenting on, like a dog that has
> to sniff every round brown object he can find.... Baiting you is the
> easiest thing in the world.
I've had lots of practice recognizing **** by reading your posts.
I thought the easiest thing was watching you abandon a topic once you get
backed into a corner on your own statements.
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:a51ng.15289$FR1.9391@dukeread05:

>
> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:34:34 -0400, "S Curtiss"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Yes, many thanks for commenting yet once again on my Greatness! I
>>>> know I am remarkable in every way, but please, temper your remarks
>>>> as I am easily
>>>> embarrassed by too much praise. After all, modesty is next to
>>>> Godliness.
>>>
>>>Anyone have any toilet paper...? Someone dropped a load of **** over
>>>here.
>>
>> ... something you just can't RESIST commenting on, like a dog that
>> has to sniff every round brown object he can find.... Baiting you is
>> the easiest thing in the world.
> I've had lots of practice recognizing **** by reading your posts.
> I thought the easiest thing was watching you abandon a topic once you
> get backed into a corner on your own statements.
>
>
>

Oh so true. Once he gets his silly ass kicked, he abandons the thread as
quickly as he pisses his pants when confrounted by one ****** off mountain
biker.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ugWmg.13603$FR1.9904@dukeread05...

[newsgroups trimmed]

> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>> While you are there (pawn shop), see if they sell red, puff noses. If
>>> you are going to accept the title "clown", you might as well dress the
>>> part.
>>> We don't know how to read you because, by your own admission, you have
>>> had the human contact of a mole. You can't hit someone with a stick then
>>> jump back and proclaim "that was funny, wasn't it?". A sense of humor is
>>> developed around people, not buried in a dusty corner of a library.
>>
>> Humor is a very difficult thing to define. What is often funny to one
>> person will not be in the least bit funny to another person. Most humor
>> is of the slapstick variety, crude and dumb (Jerry Lewis). That can never
>> appeal to types like me.
>>
>> By the way, once you have to explain humor, it is no longer humorous.
>> That is why I do not put smileys all over my posts. I want folks to get
>> it on their own. Am I being serious or not? Sometimes I do not even know.
>> I depend on others to tell me.
>
> Then listen up... If you don't know when you post it, we certainly
> aren't going to know when we see it.
> You either have the intent of being funny, or the intent of being serious.
> Deciding which it was based on the response after the fact is stupid.

I disagree strongly with you on the above. You can be serious and humorous
at the same time which is the effect I strive for. The one effect I do not
strive for is to be deadly dull. I leave that to you and your ilk.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
"S Curtiss" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:n11ng.15227$FR1.10730@dukeread05...

[newsgroups trimmed]

> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:12:56 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>> On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:57:36 -0500, "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>It is extremely important that all of this be done with the utmost
>>>>>honor,
>>>>
>>>> Please don't ever use "honor" and "mountain biker" in the same
>>>> sentence. I don't want to gag.
>>>>
>>>You should be used to it - after choking out your nonsense for years.
>>>Your OPINION of off-road cycling is not a filter for determining the
>>>character of those involved.
>>
>> Ask your mommy to look up "filter" in the dictionary. Then learn how
>> to use it properly. Idiot.
>
> Character assasination rather than addressing the concept. Typical.

All threads and posts having to do with mountain biking and trails should no
longer be posted to ARBR and RBM as these newsgroups have no interest in the
subject.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
One More Dishonest Attempt to Justify Mountain Biking
Replies
3
Views
494
Mountain Bikes
Mike Vandeman
M
M
More Illegal Mountain Biking and Trail Construction -- When Does It Ever End?????
Replies
0
Views
715
Mountain Bikes
Mike Vandeman
M
M
Three (More) Mountain Bikers Arrested for Illegally Mountain Biking in Grand Canyon National Park
Replies
6
Views
420
Mountain Bikes
Mike Vandeman
M
M
More Serious Mountain Biking Crashes
Replies
2
Views
537
Mountain Bikes
Beej
B
E
Re: "Mountain biking is no more damaging than other forms of recreation, including hiking."
Replies
135
Views
3K
Recumbent bicycles
Chris Foster
C
E
Re: "Mountain biking is no more damaging than other forms of recreation, including hiking."
Replies
156
Views
3K
Road Cycling
Chris Foster
C
articlebot
"You stand more of a chance with mountain biking of getting into the worlds" - B
Replies
0
Views
298
Cycling News Headlines
articlebot
articlebot
S
Re: Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking
Replies
0
Views
464
Mountain Bikes
S Curtiss
S
G
Re: Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking
Replies
11
Views
507
Mountain Bikes
GaryG
G
J
Re: Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking
Replies
171
Views
7K
Mountain Bikes
Just zis Guy, you know?
J
Top Bottom Back