Re: Reminder to the cycling newsgroups from Ed Dolan the Great

[T. Ling Yu]

"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:

>
> "T. Ling Yu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
> [...]
>>> Ed Gin posted using forged names.
>> Do you have proof?
>
> Of course! Go back a few years on this newsgroup (ARBR) and see for
> yourself.
>
You made the allegations, it is your responsibility to present proof.

>>> If and when you do this, then you
>>> are a criminal.
>> What law and jurisdiction, specific to USENET,
>> would he have broken, assuming you have proof.
>
> Forgery is a crime - period! But no one cares, least of all Google. But
> still it cannot be too pleasant being called a criminal by a Great Saint
> such as Myself.
>
It's more of a "PKB".

>>> Or is not forgery a crime in your slant-eyed world?
>>>
>> What do you mean by "slant-eyed world"?
>
> You do not seem to think forgery is a crime. Therefore you must see the
> world differently than I do. Slant-eyed ... perhaps?
>
Perhaps it is your perspective that is "slant-eyed".

 

[T. Ling Yu]

"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "T. Ling Yu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>>
>>> "T. Ling Yu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> "Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>> [...]
>>>>> Ed Gin posted using forged names.
>>>> Do you have proof?
>>>
>>> Of course! Go back a few years on this newsgroup (ARBR) and see for
>>> yourself.
>>>
>> You made the allegations, it is your responsibility to present proof.
>
> It is all there in the Google archive for ARBR. I NEVER look up
> anything. It all comes from my background as a college librarian.
Then you have no proof.

>>>>> If and when you do this, then you
>>>>> are a criminal.
>>>> What law and jurisdiction, specific to USENET,
>>>> would he have broken, assuming you have proof.
>>>
>>> Forgery is a crime - period! But no one cares, least of all Google.
>>> But still it cannot be too pleasant being called a criminal by a
>>> Great Saint such as Myself.
>>>
>> It's more of a "PKB".
>
> ???
>
Admission of cluelessness noted.

>>>>> Or is not forgery a crime in your slant-eyed world?
>>>>>
>>>> What do you mean by "slant-eyed world"?
>>>
>>> You do not seem to think forgery is a crime. Therefore you must see
>>> the world differently than I do. Slant-eyed ... perhaps?
>>>
>> Perhaps it is your perspective that is "slant-eyed".
>
> Nope, it is yours. Like Tom Sherman before you, you are making
> allowances for a criminal vandal troll (Ed Gin) who engaged in
> wholesale forgeries. Shame on you. I think Orientals like you know
> about shame, if nothing else.
Did you ever think that Ed Gin was a brand of distilled spirit?

 

[Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman]

On Jul 25, 10:28 pm, T. Ling Yu wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > T. Ling Yu wrote
> >> Edward Dolan wrote:
> ....
> >>> Nope, it is yours. Like Tom Sherman before you, you are making
> >>> allowances for a criminal vandal troll (Ed Gin) who engaged in
> >>> wholesale forgeries. Shame on you. I think Orientals like you know
> >>> about shame, if nothing else.
>
> >> Did you ever think that Ed Gin was a brand of distilled spirit?
>
> > Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll. No one disputes that.
>
> I dispute that. PPOSTFU.

I know for a FACT [1] that Edward Dolan has WRONGLY attributed
authorship of posts to Ed Gin that were actually made by others.

[1] Firsthand information.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful