Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandel



B

bob&carole

Guest
Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more
kids.

Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.


http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
 
Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more
kids.

Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.


http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
 
> Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
> gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.

> Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
> behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
> such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.

Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
heterosexuals.

This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
corrupting our kids" garbage.
 
On Jun 20, 10:55?am, "William Sommerwerck"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> > men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
> > gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
> > Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
> > behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
> > such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>
> Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
> heterosexuals.
>
> This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
> corrupting our kids" garbage.

No this is truth. Learn the difference.
 
bobandcarole.. wrote:

> On Jun 20, 10:55?am, "William Sommerwerck"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
>>>men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
>>>gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>>>Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
>>>behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
>>>such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>>
>>Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
>>heterosexuals.
>>
>>This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
>>corrupting our kids" garbage.
>
>
> No this is truth. Learn the difference.
>

Show some proof
 
>>> Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
>>> men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
>>> gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>>> Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
>>> behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
>>> such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.

>> Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
>> heterosexuals.
>> This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
>> corrupting our kids" garbage.

> No this is truth. Learn the difference.

Let me put it bluntly, bobandcarole. (What happened to tedandalice?) The
overwhelming majority of homosexual men, like the overwhelming majority of
heterosexual men, do not have pedophilic feelings. Period. To claim or imply
otherwise is a lie.

Do you think people are so stupid they don't understand "some are" is not
the same as "most are"?
 
On Jun 20, 11:25?am, Bob Barnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> bobandcarole.. wrote:
> > On Jun 20, 10:55?am, "William Sommerwerck"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> >>>men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
> >>>gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
> >>>Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
> >>>behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
> >>>such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>
> >>Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
> >>heterosexuals.
>
> >>This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
> >>corrupting our kids" garbage.
>
> > No this is truth. Learn the difference.
>
> Show some proof

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
 
bob&carole wrote:

> On Jun 20, 11:25?am, Bob Barnett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>bobandcarole.. wrote:
>>
>>>On Jun 20, 10:55?am, "William Sommerwerck"
>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
>>>>>men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
>>>>>gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>>>>>Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
>>>>>behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
>>>>>such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>>
>>>>Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
>>>>heterosexuals.
>>
>>>>This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
>>>>corrupting our kids" garbage.
>>
>>>No this is truth. Learn the difference.
>>
>>Show some proof
>
>
> http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244
>
>
Dumbshit-that's a column, with no facts.
Can't you understand the difference between facts and opinion?
 
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:22:00 -0700, "William Sommerwerck"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>>> Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
>>>> men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
>>>> gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
>>>> Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
>>>> behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
>>>> such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.
>
>>> Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
>>> heterosexuals.
>>> This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
>>> corrupting our kids" garbage.
>
>> No this is truth. Learn the difference.
>
>Let me put it bluntly, bobandcarole. (What happened to tedandalice?) The
>overwhelming majority of homosexual men, like the overwhelming majority of
>heterosexual men, do not have pedophilic feelings. Period. To claim or imply
>otherwise is a lie.
>
>Do you think people are so stupid they don't understand "some are" is not
>the same as "most are"?

So is NAMBLA/MAMBLA for straights? That pathetic group is on just
about every college campus these days and their opinions are accepted
under the guise of tolerance.


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Mike Smith wrote:

> So is NAMBLA/MAMBLA for straights? That pathetic group is on just
> about every college campus these days and their opinions are accepted
> under the guise of tolerance.
>
>

********
Show w URLs of Nambla groups on campus-and then proof of acceptance
 
Bob Barnett wrote:
> Mike Smith wrote:
>
>> So is NAMBLA/MAMBLA for straights? That pathetic group is on just
>> about every college campus these days and their opinions are accepted
>> under the guise of tolerance.
>>
>>
>
> ********
> Show w URLs of Nambla groups on campus-and then proof of acceptance

Nancy Pelosi marching alongside the SF chapter leader close enough?

Bill "and Mark Foley is not a pedophile" S.
 
"Bob Barnett" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> bob&carole wrote:
>
> > On Jun 20, 11:25?am, Bob Barnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>bobandcarole.. wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Jun 20, 10:55?am, "William Sommerwerck"
> >>><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>Apparently, Rep. Mark Foley is homosexual. And like many homosexual
> >>>>>men, he has pedophilic tendencies. We should pray for him that he
> >>>>>gets a handle on this problem and refrains from harming any more kids.
> >>>>>Meanwhile, we need to wake up. The fact that this is typical
> >>>>>behavior for homosexuals doesn't stop us from continuing to elevate
> >>>>>such folks to positions where they gain access to our kids.
> >>
> >>>>Paedophilia is no more "typical" behavior for homosexuals than it is for
> >>>>heterosexuals.
> >>
> >>>>This is typical "demonize the queers by making people think they're
> >>>>corrupting our kids" garbage.
> >>
> >>>No this is truth. Learn the difference.
> >>
> >>Show some proof
> >
> >
> > http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244

> Dumbshit-that's a column, with no facts.
> Can't you understand the difference between facts and opinion?

Apparently, there folks lives revolve around their preacher's opinion...
which equates to the blind leading the blind.
 
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:04:10 -0700, Bob Barnett
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Mike Smith wrote:
>
>> So is NAMBLA/MAMBLA for straights? That pathetic group is on just
>> about every college campus these days and their opinions are accepted
>> under the guise of tolerance.
>>
>>
>
>********
>Show w URLs of Nambla groups on campus-and then proof of acceptance

There is no URL for a live event, you have to go there in person. I
am sure you could find info on a website somewhere. The main reason I
object to it is that it is accepted on my behalf because I pay
activities fees due to being enrolled in classes. Then it is shoved
down everyone's throat (no pun intended).

Here is a hint, just about all college campuses have a "Bi Gay Lesbian
Alliance" You may want to start there looking for urls. They are the
ones who bring NAMBLA on campus, not any straight groups


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Mike Smith wrote:


>
> Here is a hint, just about all college campuses have a "Bi Gay Lesbian
> Alliance" You may want to start there looking for urls. They are the
> ones who bring NAMBLA on campus, not any straight groups
>
>
If there was a Nambla group on campus-google it. That's just another
pile of ********.
There is no proof of Nambla acceptance anywhere-you absolutely cannot
come up with any proof.
Crawl back into your hole.
 
"William Sommerwerck" <[email protected]> ...

> The definitive treatment of the issue of pederasty is (no kidding!) the
> South Park episode "Cartman Joins NAMBLA". It's not only a "fair"
> presentation of both sides of the issue, but the ending hits the nail right
> on the head.


Do you have the season and episode number?
 
>> The definitive treatment of the issue of pederasty is (no kidding!)
>> the South Park episode "Cartman Joins NAMBLA". It's not only
>> a "fair" presentation of both sides of the issue, but the ending
>> hits the nail right on the head.

> Do you have the season and episode number?

Have you Googled today?
 
On Jun 21, 10:25?am, Bob Barnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Here is a hint, just about all college campuses have a "Bi Gay Lesbian
> > Alliance" You may want to start there looking for urls. They are the
> > ones who bring NAMBLA on campus, not any straight groups
>
> If there was a Nambla group on campus-google it. That's just another
> pile of ********.


Prove it or STFU...moron
 
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:25:00 -0700, Bob Barnett
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Mike Smith wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Here is a hint, just about all college campuses have a "Bi Gay Lesbian
>> Alliance" You may want to start there looking for urls. They are the
>> ones who bring NAMBLA on campus, not any straight groups
>>
>>
>If there was a Nambla group on campus-google it. That's just another
>pile of ********.
>There is no proof of Nambla acceptance anywhere-you absolutely cannot
>come up with any proof.
>Crawl back into your hole.

Have someone read the above for you because you somehow aren't able to
comprehend plain English. I did not say, allege, or otherwise infer
that there was a NAMBLA group on any college campus.

I did say that the Bi, Gay, and Lesbian alliance (called Bigala)
group on two college campuses I know of invited NAMBLA to campus on
more than one occassion (University of Pittsburgh, while I was
attending college there)

Now, smartass, why, if there is no connection between pediophilia and
homosexuality, would Bigala do that?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:21:31 -0700, Bob Barnett
<[email protected]> wrote:

>********-prove it

Why don't you prove something? Everything you say is opinionated and
never backed up with fact. Just what would you need for proof? A
plane ticket and all expense paid trip to the events?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Mike Smith wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:25:00 -0700, Bob Barnett
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Mike Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Here is a hint, just about all college campuses have a "Bi Gay Lesbian
>>>Alliance" You may want to start there looking for urls. They are the
>>>ones who bring NAMBLA on campus, not any straight groups
>>>
>>>
>>
>>If there was a Nambla group on campus-google it. That's just another
>>pile of ********.
>>There is no proof of Nambla acceptance anywhere-you absolutely cannot
>>come up with any proof.
>>Crawl back into your hole.
>
>
> Have someone read the above for you because you somehow aren't able to
> comprehend plain English. I did not say, allege, or otherwise infer
> that there was a NAMBLA group on any college campus.
>
> I did say that the Bi, Gay, and Lesbian alliance (called Bigala)
> group on two college campuses I know of invited NAMBLA to campus on
> more than one occassion (University of Pittsburgh, while I was
> attending college there)
>
> Now, smartass, why, if there is no connection between pediophilia and
> homosexuality, would Bigala do that?
>
You're pathetic.
That was the original poster's claim

I never said there was no connection w pedos and homos-just like there
is w heteros and pedos
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandel
Replies
4
Views
251
Road Cycling
Lookingglass
L
M
Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandal
Replies
0
Views
244
Road Cycling
Michael Pardee
M
J
Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandel
Replies
5
Views
429
Road Cycling
bobandcarole
B
J
Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandel
Replies
0
Views
191
Road Cycling
Jeff North
J
T
Re: Sexual fascism and the Mark Foley scandel
Replies
1
Views
304
Road Cycling
bob&carole
B
Top Bottom Back