P
Paul W
Guest
As part of the research into "which 'bent" I've come across some Posts that
insist that unfaired recumbents have a larger frontal area than road bikes
and therefore cannot be competitive in terms of speed.
Some may; well designed 'bents have less frontal area.
My MR Swiftlet trike has 25% less frontal area than my wifes road bike (sit
up position.)
I measured the frontal areas using a calibrated backdrop and tele lens.
It's quite evident in a strong head wind that the trike has a huge
advantage. In no wind the two styles are about equally efficient. In a tail
wind the bikes are equal until speeds get up to 40 kph plus, at which point
the trike surges ahead (higher gearing and low profile.) Of course
performance depends on the riders, but I have ridden beside my wife on a
road bike, a 45 degree seat trike and a lowracer trike in all conditions -
the performances of the different designs are consistent.
In a tuck the road bike would be about the same, but the area presented to
the slipstream/wind is higher above the road for a road bike. Wind speed
varies with the wind at ground level being near zero and increasing with
height (which is why wind turbines are mounted on towers...) In addition,
the upright rider is disadvantaged by breathing restriction in the tuck
position.
High and low racers have a lot less frontal area.
I think another factor is "time on bike." An enthusiastic roadie will spend
a lot of time training. That doesn't seem to be the case for recumbent
riders..maybe it's because we're more laid back (sorry....)
So that's my opinion on record!
Paul W
insist that unfaired recumbents have a larger frontal area than road bikes
and therefore cannot be competitive in terms of speed.
Some may; well designed 'bents have less frontal area.
My MR Swiftlet trike has 25% less frontal area than my wifes road bike (sit
up position.)
I measured the frontal areas using a calibrated backdrop and tele lens.
It's quite evident in a strong head wind that the trike has a huge
advantage. In no wind the two styles are about equally efficient. In a tail
wind the bikes are equal until speeds get up to 40 kph plus, at which point
the trike surges ahead (higher gearing and low profile.) Of course
performance depends on the riders, but I have ridden beside my wife on a
road bike, a 45 degree seat trike and a lowracer trike in all conditions -
the performances of the different designs are consistent.
In a tuck the road bike would be about the same, but the area presented to
the slipstream/wind is higher above the road for a road bike. Wind speed
varies with the wind at ground level being near zero and increasing with
height (which is why wind turbines are mounted on towers...) In addition,
the upright rider is disadvantaged by breathing restriction in the tuck
position.
High and low racers have a lot less frontal area.
I think another factor is "time on bike." An enthusiastic roadie will spend
a lot of time training. That doesn't seem to be the case for recumbent
riders..maybe it's because we're more laid back (sorry....)
So that's my opinion on record!
Paul W