T
Tony Raven
Guest
Richard Corfield wrote:
>
>
> Don't they also give audible warning, in which case wouldn't extending the
> database to cover all speed limits, not just those with cameras on, be a
> good thing? It would be so easy to do with current GPS technology. I'd
> stick at the verbal warning, rather than enforcing the limit, as there may
> be reasons to hit transient high speeds that the system cannot know about.
>
There are trials going on in Leeds (IIRC) on a GPS based speed
controller for cars. The big effort is to map all the speed limits into
the database to extend it beyond Leeds. It does not prevent you going
over the speed limit but the accelerator pedal becomes heavy and needs a
good push to go any faster so that its pretty easy to stick to the speed
limit but go faster if an emergency requires it.
Tony
>
>
> Don't they also give audible warning, in which case wouldn't extending the
> database to cover all speed limits, not just those with cameras on, be a
> good thing? It would be so easy to do with current GPS technology. I'd
> stick at the verbal warning, rather than enforcing the limit, as there may
> be reasons to hit transient high speeds that the system cannot know about.
>
There are trials going on in Leeds (IIRC) on a GPS based speed
controller for cars. The big effort is to map all the speed limits into
the database to extend it beyond Leeds. It does not prevent you going
over the speed limit but the accelerator pedal becomes heavy and needs a
good push to go any faster so that its pretty easy to stick to the speed
limit but go faster if an emergency requires it.
Tony