Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> Bob Pastorio <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>
>>Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>
>>>bjmpls wrote:
>>>>Actually, "truth be told", your constant threats to sue people you
>>>>disagree with for "libel" is getting a bit old.
>>>
>>>Pastorio hardly a people make.
>>
>>What perfectly splendid use of the language.
>
>>>>And your inane
>>>>theories about diet, taken together with your overweening
>>>
>>>overweening?
>>
>>Yes. Overweening and in arrogant.
>
> Is that supposed to be a sentence?
Actually no, it isn't. It's supposed to be a sentence fragment. It was
a typographic error that should have read "Overweening as in arrogant."
>>Any native speaker of English should
>>know that.
>
> Doesn't look like a sentence to me.
And now you know why. And now you also know why the word "overweening"
applies to you like ugly on a monkey.
>>Chung's rather constant bad use of the language should be a
>>source of embarrassment.
>
> Why should I be embarrassed by your problems?
<LOL> Chung points to a typo as an example of bad English usage while
himself displaying a careless disregard for accuracy and honesty in
using the language. Hilarious, and a classic display of his hypocrisy.
>>>>and
>>>>incessant references to Christ, and your alacrity in shelling out
>>>>medical advice to persons unseen and unexamined
>>>
>>>When I give medical advice, I will have examined said individual receiving
>>>the advice.
>>
>>I wonder if it's Chung's claim that all the people he gives "medical
>>advice" to have been examined by him?
>
> It is.
>
>>All these posts with "diagnoses"
>>and suggestions for treatment?
>
> Should be easy for you to cite such posts if they exist.
Anyone needing to refresh their memories of such posts only need to
read what Chung posted today, both in his quack mode and his
advice-giving mode. No need to even visit the halls of Google. It's
available every day...
>>Did those people go to his office?
>
> Folks that want my medical advice, do.
>
>>Meet him in a hospital?
>
> Possibly.
>
>>Oh, wait.
>>He has no hospital privileges.
>
> You seem to be having delusions again.
Notice how he doesn't deny that he has no hospital privileges. Notice
how he immediately slips into Chungspeak and "describes" or
"diagnoses" illegal drug use and mental infirmity on my part.
> Would suggest you stop eating
> the mushrooms and see a psychiatrist. You can visit me at my office
> and after examining you, I could start some psychotropic medications
> and refer you to a psychiatrist.
Chung could refer me to a psychiatrist, he says. Because he's
unqualified to evaluate anything to do with psychiatry. And in keeping
with his quackery, first he prescribes medicine, then refers to a
trained professional who will know better what to do than he does.
Give 'em drugs, says Chung, then ask questions.
>>Examined, he says.
>
> Yes.
>
>>Could there be a moment of less
>>than full truth there?
>
> No.
So all the people Chung advises online have been examined by him? All
the advice he gives in SMC has been tailored to the specific patient
that he knows about from personal contact and examination?
>> As for altruism, Chung posts so suckers will go to his web site and
>>sign up for medical care to enrich Chung's coffers.
>
> Would that be the reason for this post?
>
> Or is this yet another one of your delusions.
Nice try from Chung to avoid the reality. His web site offers a way to
get in touch with him for the purpose of becoming a patient of his. By
any rational view, that's called advertising. And since he doesn't say
the service is free, a reasonable assumption would be that he charges
for his time. Sounds like a sales promotion program designed to make
Chung money. To bolster a medical practice. To make money.
>>That's commerce,
>>not altruism.
>
> Is it your claim that you can see into my heart?
I cannot see into Chung's heart. I can see into Chung's words and
actions. Working on the principle that people don't act more honorably
than their core (heart) values, it's rather a simple and essentially
unavoidable conclusion that Chung is money-grubbing with his web site.
Not to mention misrepresenting what others have posted online and
tried to punish people with untruths.
>>>Humbly,
>>
>><Insert definition of humble here>
>
> Doing so would only prove that I continue to write truthfully.
If Chung insists, here's the definition that "proves" that Chung is
either deluded or a fraud. Or both.
Hum'-ble, n.
1. having or showing a consciousness of one's defects or shortcomings;
not proud; not self-assertive; modest.
synonyms. - lowly, meek, submissive, unassuming, unobtrusive, unassuming.
Hu-mil'-i-ty, n.
1. the state or quality of being humble of mind or spirit; absence of
pride or self-assertion.
2. [pl] acts of self-abasement.
Pastorio