D
DRS
Guest
"sheik yerbouti" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 04:50:01 +1000, "DRS"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> reported fatality rates:
>>> china - 26.1
>>> australia - 1.8
>>>
>>> clearly australia is *far* safer than china, in terms of road
>>> safety.
>>>
>>> you say "He's never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no
>>> sign of ever doing so.", well here it is.
>>>
>>> you say " My point is that this ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs
>>> his claims up with links or cites", well here i am, backing it up.
>>>
>>> now kiss my ****
>>
>> In your dreams. *You* never provided anything but bald assertions.
>
> the evidence is staring at you, at the top of this post. are you blind
> or just stupid, or both?
I'm neither, as all the world can see. All you've done is use a statistic
from a link that someone else gave. To have even the slightest credibility
you should have provided the evidence yourself when first asked but you
didn't. Moreover, the way you used that statistic out of context shows how
little you understood the source.
> you can clearly see that chinese traffic is far less safe than in
> australia. do you want it spelled out in a more simple fashion? what
> aren't you getting?
Get back to us if and when you ever graduate from high school.
--
A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?
news:[email protected]
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 04:50:01 +1000, "DRS"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> reported fatality rates:
>>> china - 26.1
>>> australia - 1.8
>>>
>>> clearly australia is *far* safer than china, in terms of road
>>> safety.
>>>
>>> you say "He's never produced a shred of actual evidence and shows no
>>> sign of ever doing so.", well here it is.
>>>
>>> you say " My point is that this ****** "sheik yerbouti" never backs
>>> his claims up with links or cites", well here i am, backing it up.
>>>
>>> now kiss my ****
>>
>> In your dreams. *You* never provided anything but bald assertions.
>
> the evidence is staring at you, at the top of this post. are you blind
> or just stupid, or both?
I'm neither, as all the world can see. All you've done is use a statistic
from a link that someone else gave. To have even the slightest credibility
you should have provided the evidence yourself when first asked but you
didn't. Moreover, the way you used that statistic out of context shows how
little you understood the source.
> you can clearly see that chinese traffic is far less safe than in
> australia. do you want it spelled out in a more simple fashion? what
> aren't you getting?
Get back to us if and when you ever graduate from high school.
--
A: Top-posters.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?