UK and Europe · Public discussion

Training

Started by Doki · · Last activity · 69 posts · 1,527 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
28 May 2004
Last activity
1 June 2004
Original author
Doki
Posts
69
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,527
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 69
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I want to go faster and further on my bike. I know the obvious answer is to
    do a lot of riding. Has anyone got any pointers on interval training or
    other ways to get more out of my time on the bike?

  2. Doki said:

    I want to go faster and further on my bike. I know the obvious answer is to
    do a lot of riding. Has anyone got any pointers on interval training or
    other ways to get more out of my time on the bike?

    Find your local club and go out with other people wanting the same
    thing. Being in a pack pushing one another not only helps fitness and
    speed but makes your cycling better on a meter to meter basis as well.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  3. Peter Clinch said:
    Doki said:

    I want to go faster and further on my bike. I know the obvious
    answer is to do a lot of riding. Has anyone got any pointers on
    interval training or other ways to get more out of my time on the
    bike?

    Find your local club and go out with other people wanting the same
    thing. Being in a pack pushing one another not only helps fitness and
    speed but makes your cycling better on a meter to meter basis as well.

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up. Though if I did, I'd be very pleased as
    I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be roadies 🙂.

  4. Doki said:

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up.

    You'd be surprised! I only did my rirst group riding this year, and it is
    amazing how much difference the group makes; not just in terms of
    aerodynamics, but also the motivation.

    Quoted message said:

    Though if I did, I'd be very
    pleased as I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be
    roadies 🙂.

    This could be an issue -- get a road bike. ;-) Seriously though, as long as
    there's no mad sprinting going on, you should be fine. If a little
    weird-looking.

  5. Doki <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up. Though if I did, I'd be very pleased as
    : I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be roadies 🙂.

    Ah. The usual advice about how to get fit for MTB'ing is "buy a road bike". And
    with good reason. Not only is it possible to exercise at a consistent effort level
    but (as Pete says) you can ride with others, and this makes you much faster quickly

    The full works on the subject is "The Cyclists Training Manual" by Joe Friel,
    available at a bookshop near you.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune http://www.clune.org
    "Technolibertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  6. Quoted message said:

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up. Though if I did, I'd be very pleased as
    I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be roadies 🙂.

    Suggestions.

    CTC - local groups often have group rides organised. There may be something to
    suit your style & pace of cycling, that is lots of cyclists out together.

    British Cycling/CTT web sites to look up lists of clubs in your area. Find some
    - make phone calls - ask what sort of rides they do where a "beginner" to club
    riding would be welcome. Some clubs have serious training rides for the fast
    sorts and also easier paced rides for the less fit, slower, more leisurely
    types.

    If you can't afford a road bike right now - how about some semi-slicks on your
    MTB, if you haven't alredy done this, as these tyres will make it a bit easier
    on road?

    Audaxes - you don't *have* to have a road bike and there are off-road ones as
    well as the traditional on-road ones. Start off on short audaxes & gradually
    work upwards?

    Hope this helps a bit.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  7. Arthur Clune said:
    Doki said:

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up. Though if I did, I'd be very
    pleased as I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be
    roadies 🙂.

    Ah. The usual advice about how to get fit for MTB'ing is "buy a road
    bike". And with good reason.

    Should happen some time this summer after I've spent money on holidays and
    so on, and have some sort of commute I could do on a bike.

    Quoted message said:

    Not only is it possible to exercise at a
    consistent effort level but (as Pete says) you can ride with others,
    and this makes you much faster quickly

    Not round here it's not. Perhaps I should move to Norfolk or Lincolnshire
    and enjoy mile after mile of perfectly level road...

    Quoted message said:

    The full works on the subject is "The Cyclists Training Manual" by
    Joe Friel, available at a bookshop near you.

    I'll look it up.

  8. Doki said:

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up.

    Would depend on the club in question. Some have lower powered rides for
    lower powered people.

    Quoted message said:

    Though if I did, I'd be very pleased as
    I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be roadies 🙂.

    But bottom line is you don't know until you try, and you might be okay
    if you put some fast tyres on.
    It's also entirely possible someone on your friendly neighbourhood chain
    gang will have a pretty reasonable winter hack they'd be happy to lend
    you for a few rides (perhaps for a small regular payment in pint form)
    until you get your own (or decide it's not for you...). Get in touch
    with the local clubs and see what they have to say for themselves on the
    matter.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch University of Dundee
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Medical Physics, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Arthur Clune said:

    Ah. The usual advice about how to get fit for MTB'ing is "buy a road bike". And
    with good reason. Not only is it possible to exercise at a consistent effort level

    A mountain bike with slicks and, perhaps, suspension lockout [*] isn't
    _that_ far from a flat-barred road bike. It's heavier, and it's lacking
    a bunch of long gear ratios, but you get some very low gear ratios to
    make up for both of those problems.

    ian

    [*] Although that may or may not be a good thing. I weigh about 16
    stone, and if I lock the rear suspension on my bike it appears that I
    can flex something, probably the seat post, as I pedal. The effect is
    horrible, and indeed both similar to and of larger magnitude to the
    worst things the rear suspension can do when it is unlocked. Tall
    people on mountain bikes of a ``compact frame'' layout, like the Marin,
    will tend to have a lot of seat post exposed, so it's a candidate for
    flex. I'm tempted to try a more rigid seatpost.

  10. Doki <[email hidden]> wrote:

    :> I said:
    :> Not only is it possible to exercise at a
    :> consistent effort level but (as Pete says) you can ride with others,
    :> and this makes you much faster quickly

    : Not round here it's not. Perhaps I should move to Norfolk or Lincolnshire
    : and enjoy mile after mile of perfectly level road...

    You can do constant level training in the hills, but it takes displine. It means
    going *very* slowly up to keep the effort down and then pushing on more on
    the descents than you would normally. And maybe adjusting routes slightly.

    You could try a local road club ona hardtail with 1" slicks and see how you
    go.

    Arthur

    --
    Arthur Clune http://www.clune.org
    "Technolibertarians make a philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  11. Quoted message said:

    Not round here it's not. Perhaps I should move to Norfolk or Lincolnshire
    and enjoy mile after mile of perfectly level road...

    Don't include Norfolk in your choice if that's your priority then. It may not
    be mountainous, but it *is* undulating - very little is perfectly level - the
    Broads (a flat bit) only cover a small proportion of the county. The fens
    (flat) are Cambs/Lincs and a *tiny* bit in Norfolk.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  12. Doki said:

    I want to go faster and further on my bike. I know the obvious answer is to
    do a lot of riding. Has anyone got any pointers on interval training or
    other ways to get more out of my time on the bike?


    Join the local club and do some evening "10"s. They won't mind if you
    use an MTB, although slick tyres are recommended for a half-decent time.

  13. in message <[email hidden]>,

    dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers (') said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not round here it's not. Perhaps I should move to Norfolk or
    Lincolnshire and enjoy mile after mile of perfectly level road...

    Don't include Norfolk in your choice if that's your priority then. It
    may not be mountainous, but it *is* undulating - very little is
    perfectly level - the Broads (a flat bit) only cover a small
    proportion of the county. The fens (flat) are Cambs/Lincs and a *tiny*
    bit in Norfolk.

    H'mmmmph! We rate one of our regular twelve mile loops as 'flat' because
    it involves only about 100 metres of climb. Hills are relative.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; I'll have a proper rant later, when I get the time.

  14. in message <[email hidden]>, Ian G Batten

    (') said:

    Although that may or may not be a good thing. I weigh about 16
    stone, and if I lock the rear suspension on my bike it appears that I
    can flex something, probably the seat post, as I pedal. The effect is
    horrible, and indeed both similar to and of larger magnitude to the
    worst things the rear suspension can do when it is unlocked. Tall
    people on mountain bikes of a ``compact frame'' layout, like the
    Marin, will tend to have a lot of seat post exposed, so it's a
    candidate for flex. I'm tempted to try a more rigid seatpost.

    Interestingly my Klein, which has a great length of exposed seatpost,
    has a great length of exposed seatpost of enormous girth - a whacking
    31.6mm diameter, like a young scaffolding pole. It Does Not Flex. Not
    of course that this is a feature you can retro-fit onto just any old
    bike, of course.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    There are no messages. The above is just a random stream of
    bytes. Any opinion or meaning you find in it is your own creation.

  15. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:
    Quoted message said:

    Not round here it's not. Perhaps I should move to Norfolk or
    Lincolnshire and enjoy mile after mile of perfectly level road...

    Don't include Norfolk in your choice if that's your priority then. It
    may not be mountainous, but it *is* undulating - very little is
    perfectly level - the Broads (a flat bit) only cover a small
    proportion of the county. The fens (flat) are Cambs/Lincs and a
    *tiny* bit in Norfolk.

    I'd driven around Norfolk a fair bit, and it's very very flat compared to
    around here (Derbyshire).

  16. Doki said:
    Peter Clinch said:
    Doki said:

    I want to go faster and further on my bike. I know the obvious
    answer is to do a lot of riding. Has anyone got any pointers on
    interval training or other ways to get more out of my time on the
    bike?

    Find your local club and go out with other people wanting the same
    thing. Being in a pack pushing one another not only helps fitness and
    speed but makes your cycling better on a meter to meter basis as well.

    I'm pretty sure I wouldn't keep up. Though if I did, I'd be very pleased as
    I'd be on a mountain bike and they'd all most likely be roadies 🙂.

    Until it was pinched in December, I used a MTB with guards and slicks on
    club runs. Heavy; yes, but I'm the captain so they'd have to wait for me
    :-)
    But they didn't need to...

    Now I have a hybrid road bike with flat bars for winter-training/work.

    If you're in the Wirral area, come with us. We acommodate all.

  17. Quoted message said:

    H'mmmmph! We rate one of our regular twelve mile loops as 'flat' because
    it involves only about 100 metres of climb. Hills are relative.

    Of course hills are relative. But flat is flat - and Norfolk *isn't* flat. It
    is indeed less hilly than many a place, but flat, it isn't. As when I was doing
    that charity cycle ride a couple of weeks or so ago, going up a long drag
    between a couple of villages, the non-Norfolk cyclist next to me said, "Whoever
    said Norfolk was flat was a liar!" :-)

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  18. Quoted message said:


    I'd driven around Norfolk a fair bit, and it's very very flat compared to
    around here (Derbyshire).

    Of course Norfolk isn't as hilly as Derbyshire, I don't claim it is - but it
    *isn't* flat.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  19. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'd driven around Norfolk a fair bit, and it's very very flat
    compared to around here (Derbyshire).

    Of course Norfolk isn't as hilly as Derbyshire, I don't claim it is -
    but it *isn't* flat.

    It's as near to flat as you're likely to get. Unless you go to that place in
    America that scientists calculated was actually flatter than a pancake...

  20. Quoted message said:

    It's as near to flat as you're likely to get. Unless you go to that place in
    America that scientists calculated was actually flatter than a pancake...

    Whatever. Obviously the slopes around where I live are a figment of the
    imagination.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.