Will Lances kids be great cyclists one day?

[swamprun]

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:

> If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
>
> Zoom

http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm

Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.

 

[swamprun]

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:16:31 +0800, Zoom wrote:

> If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
>
> Zoom

http://www.pponline.co.uk/encyc/0219.htm

Scroll down to the "Why Mother is Best" section.

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[gwhite]

[email protected] wrote:
> Zoom a écrit :
> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are the
> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>
> Regression to the mean.
>

Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steve Freides]

"gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> Zoom a écrit :
>> > If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>> > the
>> > chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>
>> Regression to the mean.
>>
>
> Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?

Bond, James Bond.

-S-

 

[Steven Bornfeld]

Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>
>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-

Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>


--
Cut the nonsense to reply

 

[Steven Bornfeld]

Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>
>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-

Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>


--
Cut the nonsense to reply

 

[Steven Bornfeld]

Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>
>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-

Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>


--
Cut the nonsense to reply

 

[Steven Bornfeld]

Steve Freides wrote:
> "gwhite" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>Zoom a écrit :
>>>
>>>>If a large part of Lances success is due to his genetics, what are
>>>>the
>>>>chances of one of Lances kids being on the podium in years to come?
>>>
>>>Regression to the mean.
>>>
>>
>>Barry Bonds was a regression from Bobby Bonds?
>
>
> Bond, James Bond.
>
> -S-

Smartass guitar player.

Steve

>
>


--
Cut the nonsense to reply