Will The Hog Fight USADA Charges?

[slovakguy]

admittedly i'm really more interested in the kimmage v uci case, but armstrong wasn't the only party to be charged by usada. a timely reminder from velonews that bruyneel still wants his day so that he may be heard.

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/11/news/usada-will-hear-bruyneels-case-before-end-of-2012-may-call-armstrong-to-testify_263275

and another bit from velonews about the stakes bruyneel is pushing on the table:

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012/11/analysis/analysis-bruyneels-arbitration-proceeding-could-give-usada-the-power-to-subpoena-witnesses-including-armstrong_263566

truth be told, i'm hoping eurosport sends the team to boulder for wall-to-wall coverage of that hearing. and mark me down with the group that says bruyneel is soon to be convinced to take the lifetime ban and keep his mouth shut.

 

[rusty nuts]

we live in hope

 

[qdc15]

"Given the stakes, Bruyneel is likely facing significant pressure, and possibly significant incentives, to back away from his arbitration proceedings."

 

[trxsale]

[SIZE=10.5000pt]This article is very good. I like it so much. It is useful, keep working. good job, friends.[/SIZE]