Most americans have very short memories. (I can't even remember who won the NCAA bball tournament.) If FL wins, he will be the general public media darling for a week or so; then fade. Almost all americans have no clue or interest in bicycle racing (they can't sit in a chair and watch it be decided in 4 hours). I suspect most americans can't name one homey in the tour this year. If FL wins (and he should) this tour will be a blip on american screens but FL will be a legend in Europe. I think he'd be better off on a european team but americans love winners and DC may do anything to get his services. BUT the real question is WHY does DC put so much $ into cycling, to garner business in the US or Europe? DC will build a team around what suits their financial interests the best.
Not to slam LA but I grew tired of him winning the tour every year. The TdF lacked drama. It was not a question of who would win but when would LA claim the maillot jaune. Was LA that balanced as a racer, other than winning the tour, worlds once, Fleche, and some mini tour stage wins? (other grand tours, classics?) Is this even fair with the specialization of riders now? I guess it would have been nice to see him in other grand tours but he focused on the TdF b/c thats the only race americans know (or have even heard about) and I suspect winning that race cemented him forever in the TdF and fed his ego?
This is not to slam americans, I was born and raised here and it was really nice to have a tour with real daily drama.