General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

re; How i spent

Started by Doug Freese · · Last activity · 156 posts · 3,881 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 January 2006
Last activity
22 January 2006
Original author
Doug Freese
Posts
156
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,881
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 81–100 of 156
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Donovan Rebbechi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    The Trailrunner said:


    Utter nonsense.

    (1) Phidippedes was not a member of the aristrocracy in pursuit of glory.

    Dude, you were Ok until you brought up the aristocracy. If you meant the
    explorers, OK some were. If you meant trailrunners, your head is up your
    ass. Hard core runners (including trailrunners) are almost always
    middle-to-lower income types. My complaint is that they are such damn
    cheapskates they give us all a bad name. I go to a marathon and you see 5
    guys sharing a room at the Motel 6 and they pack their meals.

    No, runners are poorer, cheap, and they sponge off others a lot.

    Quoted message said:

    (2) Phidippedes or not, someone would find a good way to tell stories


    about

    Quoted message said:

    people covering a lot of distance.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  2. Donovan Rebbechi said:


    The Trailrunner said:
    Donovan Rebbechi said:

    In fact "Trailrunner"
    defended the idea of setting "records" that are uncontested (e.g.
    go to some location no-one else has run, and set a "record" there)

    Do the names Sir Edmund Hillary or Roald Amundsen mean anything to you?
    I'm not trying to compare the accomplishments of ultrarunner
    trailblazers to these folks, but "because it is there" is still a pretty
    strong motivation to a lot of folks.

    Rich white men with too much time on their hands imitating other rich white
    men with too much time on their hands in pursuit of glory. Lance is dead-on on
    this point.

    That's about the most ignorant thing you've said...
    Lots of these people who accomplished great feats of
    climbing or exploration has to scrounge for funds.
    If you want to insult something, insult Victorian
    arrogance, not the men who risked life and limb.

    You likely couldn't get above Base Camp let alone
    to Everest's summit. And I know several climbers
    who've been there. None are rich. They sacrificed
    a lot to do what they do. Hillary in particular was
    a man of vast integrity who spent the rest of his
    life building schools and improving the lot of the
    native Nepalese.

  3. Donovan Rebbechi said:

    -- I'm

    Quoted message said:

    referring to a particular subset of white people. Talking about "ghetto
    blacks" at least potentially smears the whole group because "ghetto black"
    is a stereotype that is used to characterise "black".

    Subset of white people? Which "subset" are you in?

    Your utter lack of humility and respect for your
    betters (i.e., average people accomlishing great things
    regardless of race or social status) put's you in a
    class all by yourself...

  4. Tom Phillips said:


    -- I'm

    Quoted message said:

    referring to a particular subset of white people. Talking about "ghetto
    blacks" at least potentially smears the whole group because "ghetto black"
    is a stereotype that is used to characterise "black".

    Subset of white people? Which "subset" are you in?

    How is it relevant ? The point is that I'm not invoking a negative ethnic
    stereotype against an out-group.

    Quoted message said:

    Your utter lack of humility

    How am I "lacking humility" ?

    Quoted message said:

    and respect for your betters
    (i.e., average people accomlishing great things
    regardless of race or social status)
    put's you in a class all by yourself...

    OK, these people are "better than" me, even though they're "average". I lack
    "humility". And I'm apparently in some maligned class of which I'm the only
    member.

    Anything else you'd like to add ? Why not call me ugly, and insult my mother
    while you're at it ? Don't hold anything back, tell us how you really feel (-;

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  5. Tom Phillips said:
    Donovan Rebbechi said:


    The Trailrunner said:

    Donovan Rebbechi wrote:

    > In fact "Trailrunner"
    > defended the idea of setting "records" that are uncontested (e.g.
    > go to some location no-one else has run, and set a "record" there)

    Do the names Sir Edmund Hillary or Roald Amundsen mean anything to you?
    I'm not trying to compare the accomplishments of ultrarunner
    trailblazers to these folks, but "because it is there" is still a pretty
    strong motivation to a lot of folks.

    Rich white men with too much time on their hands imitating other rich white
    men with too much time on their hands in pursuit of glory. Lance is dead-on
    on this point.

    That's about the most ignorant thing you've said...
    Lots of these people who accomplished great feats of
    climbing or exploration has to scrounge for funds.

    That doesn't contradict the idea that they were from a relatively priveliged
    class in the first place. I mean, I doubt the poor of the day even had the
    ear of someone who had the funds to scrounge for.

    Quoted message said:

    If you want to insult something, insult Victorian

    How is it insulting someone to call them white and to suggest that they have
    a relatively priveliged background ? I'm white and my background is somewhat
    priveliged. I don't find this observation insulting.

    Quoted message said:

    arrogance, not the men who risked life and limb.

    You likely couldn't get above Base Camp let alone
    to Everest's summit.

    No idea, no interest in finding out.

    Quoted message said:

    And I know several climbers who've been there. None are rich. They
    sacrificed a lot to do what they do.

    Obviously they have the time and resources to do that. They might not be
    multi millionaires, but I doubt they're living in a low SES inner city
    neighbourhood.

    Quoted message said:

    Hillary in particular was a man of vast integrity who spent the rest of his
    life building schools and improving the lot of the native Nepalese.

    Yes, which he was able to do because <drum roll> he was a rich white guy with
    a lot of time on his hands. Of course he was extraordinarily responsible with
    both his time and his wealth. But to deny that he's somewhat fortunate is just
    silly.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  6. Donovan Rebbechi said:


    Tom Phillips said:


    -- I'm

    Quoted message said:

    referring to a particular subset of white people. Talking about "ghetto
    blacks" at least potentially smears the whole group because "ghetto black"
    is a stereotype that is used to characterise "black".

    Subset of white people? Which "subset" are you in?

    How is it relevant ? The point is that I'm not invoking a negative ethnic
    stereotype against an out-group.

    Quoted message said:

    Your utter lack of humility

    How am I "lacking humility" ?

    Quoted message said:

    and respect for your betters
    (i.e., average people accomlishing great things
    regardless of race or social status)
    put's you in a class all by yourself...

    OK, these people are "better than" me, even though they're "average". I lack
    "humility". And I'm apparently in some maligned class of which I'm the only
    member.

    Anything else you'd like to add ? Why not call me ugly, and insult my mother
    while you're at it ? Don't hold anything back, tell us how you really feel (-;

    I'd say you're the one making insults, calling people
    like Hillary and Amundsen "Rich white men with too much
    time on their hands imitating other rich white men with
    too much time on their hands in pursuit of glory..."

    Hillary and Amundsen are both examples we could all
    learn lessons from, and deserve respect, which in fact
    requires humility...

    And whether you're ugly or not isn't an issue, since
    I'm only interested in the female of the species...

  7. Donovan Rebbechi said:


    Tom Phillips said:
    Donovan Rebbechi said:


    On 2006-01-18, The Trailrunner <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >
    > Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
    >
    >
    >> In fact "Trailrunner"
    >> defended the idea of setting "records" that are uncontested (e.g.
    >> go to some location no-one else has run, and set a "record" there)
    >
    > Do the names Sir Edmund Hillary or Roald Amundsen mean anything to you?
    > I'm not trying to compare the accomplishments of ultrarunner
    > trailblazers to these folks, but "because it is there" is still a pretty
    > strong motivation to a lot of folks.

    Rich white men with too much time on their hands imitating other rich white
    men with too much time on their hands in pursuit of glory. Lance is dead-on
    on this point.

    That's about the most ignorant thing you've said...
    Lots of these people who accomplished great feats of
    climbing or exploration has to scrounge for funds.

    That doesn't contradict the idea that they were from a relatively priveliged
    class in the first place. I mean, I doubt the poor of the day even had the
    ear of someone who had the funds to scrounge for.

    Quoted message said:

    If you want to insult something, insult Victorian

    How is it insulting someone to call them white and to suggest that they have
    a relatively priveliged background ? I'm white and my background is somewhat
    priveliged. I don't find this observation insulting.

    A rationalization...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    arrogance, not the men who risked life and limb.

    You likely couldn't get above Base Camp let alone
    to Everest's summit.

    No idea, no interest in finding out.

    Proves my point...you have zero business mouthing
    off about what you have zero knowledge of...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And I know several climbers who've been there. None are rich. They
    sacrificed a lot to do what they do.

    Obviously they have the time and resources to do that. They might not be
    multi millionaires, but I doubt they're living in a low SES inner city
    neighbourhood.

    If you think I'm going to offer rebuttal by
    discussing my friends or acquaintances financial
    status you're all wet and again lacking any
    sensitivity and humility. Suffice to say you
    have zero idea of what you're talking about...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hillary in particular was a man of vast integrity who spent the rest of his
    life building schools and improving the lot of the native Nepalese.

    Yes, which he was able to do because <drum roll> he was a rich white guy with
    a lot of time on his hands. Of course he was extraordinarily responsible with
    both his time and his wealth. But to deny that he's somewhat fortunate is just
    silly.

    He was able to do it because he was the first to
    summit Everest with Tenzing Norgay and thus gained
    humility plus the respect of the people he helped.
    As for being fortunate, he was fortunate to stay
    alive. And if you doubt that get yourself an idiot
    tour guide and go view the dead bodies that line the
    South Col route.

    BTW, an acquaintance of mine, someone I'd climbed
    with, was recently tragically killed pursuing his
    passion on Kilimanjaro and whether one is rich or
    not makes zero difference (he wasn't, and neither
    is any other world class climbers I know.) The
    point being average people of average means aspire
    to and do extraordinary things. And it has nothing
    to do with your idiot opinion.

    So. if you want to continue to make a fool of yourself
    just continue this arguement...

  8. Tom Phillips said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'd say you're the one making insults, calling people
    like Hillary and Amundsen "Rich white men with too much
    time on their hands imitating other rich white men with
    too much time on their hands in pursuit of glory..."

    No, not unless you're saying that Dean Karnazes is like
    Amundsen and Hillary. If *that's* what you're saying, I'd
    say you're just delusional.

    Quoted message said:

    Hillary and Amundsen are both examples we could all
    learn lessons from, and deserve respect, which in fact
    requires humility...

    First, this is illogical, because it follows that one who
    does respect them has humility, but the converse doesn't
    follow.

    Second, getting down to *my* opinion, there are a lot of
    reasons that Hillary deserves respect, but climbing big
    mountains is not one of primary ones in my opinion.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  9. Tom Phillips said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    How is it insulting someone to call them white and to suggest that they have
    a relatively priveliged background ? I'm white and my background is somewhat
    priveliged. I don't find this observation insulting.

    A rationalization...

    Note: no rebuttal ...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    arrogance, not the men who risked life and limb.

    You likely couldn't get above Base Camp let alone
    to Everest's summit.

    No idea, no interest in finding out.

    Proves my point...you have zero business mouthing
    off about what you have zero knowledge of...

    No, it doesn't prove anything. The "you couldn't get above base camp" is
    not relevant to the debate, it's a cheap-shot on your part.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And I know several climbers who've been there. None are rich. They
    sacrificed a lot to do what they do.

    Obviously they have the time and resources to do that. They might not be
    multi millionaires, but I doubt they're living in a low SES inner city
    neighbourhood.

    If you think I'm going to offer rebuttal by

    I don't think you're going to.

    Note: no rebuttal (-;

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Hillary in particular was a man of vast integrity who spent the rest of
    his life building schools and improving the lot of the native Nepalese.

    Yes, which he was able to do because <drum roll> he was a rich white guy
    with a lot of time on his hands. Of course he was extraordinarily
    responsible with both his time and his wealth. But to deny that he's
    somewhat fortunate is just silly.

    He was able to do it because he was the first to
    summit Everest with Tenzing Norgay and thus gained
    humility plus the respect of the people he helped.
    As for being fortunate, he was fortunate to stay
    alive.

    Note: no rebuttal (-;

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, an acquaintance of mine, someone I'd climbed
    with, was recently tragically killed pursuing his
    passion on Kilimanjaro and whether one is rich or
    not makes zero difference (he wasn't, and neither
    is any other world class climbers I know.) The
    point being average people of average means aspire
    to and do extraordinary things.

    Well, whatever toots your flute. I'm personally not impressed by it
    and thus don't seek to emulate it. There are other things that impress
    me and that I'd like to emulate instead. Different strokes for
    different folks. Perhaps *you're* the one who lacks humility in your
    insistence that I adopt *your* values.

    Quoted message said:

    And it has nothing to do with your idiot opinion.

    Hey, if you want to attack my intelligence, please do so in
    well-formed sentences.

    Quoted message said:

    So. if you want to continue to make a fool of yourself
    just continue this arguement...

    There's very little to continue since you do little more than make personal
    attacks without providing rebuttals on any of the substantive issues.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  10. On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:06:55 -0700, Tom Phillips <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I'm only interested in the female of the species...

    That's not what your boyfriend told me.

  11. and on friday, the monkey well keep the boogie's boards.

    get your own summer gear:
    t.v. late shows......
    I wonder if lightning can shoot out my sweats :
    and electric wire and tips pure from the back. be good for that chick.

    maybe the Yahh bang baby baby song baby baby song.......... with the
    3 guys in the t.v gig in a office danceing to that boom box. baby
    baby
    Johnson ?,?,?>
    cohan walking in N.Y. show......

    and zaps of flsh lightning all around......

    baby baby boom boom .

    Nah never happen in my life time. oh well.........cabin fever must
    be over done here....maybe, ahh get real.......
    probe not?
    falling off a back of a horse would do it...baby baby...... and a
    cowboy hat?........
    boomm boom baby bay......be.....

    falling off back of horse. catch her and find a rock..........
    probe not. truth is she probe wanted to kill me too......

    brought to you by rock finance... The little [censored]
    people..............Detroit pistons.
    agen them dang atlanta u.s.a. Halk..........

    wait a rr tick detroit one.
    strike another for rock.the little [censored] people at rock
    finance.....were you know. a baby baby gets the girl........

    ahhh hell...............

    dang wires..........trash..........

    Stand in line.........

  12. in the trails

    LOL funny thing about all these guys.....
    in a real race I well be in the back and a ways into it. we well meet
    up because every time they follow the leader who ends up taking the
    wrong trail. and loses hours......LOL

  13. Tony S. said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So in your own mind I'm sure you could beat me anywhere, anytime. That's


    the point of the wager - an easy

    Quoted message said:

    $100 for you if you believe you can beat me on any terrain because I'm
    "just
    not in your class as a runner", eh...
    _

    it's not your times that illustrates your not in my league, it's your
    emphasis of dwelling on $100 dollars. you're not a
    competitor...tony...$ is not going to motivate a competitor, certainly
    not me. if you're so intent on kicking my ass you would just show up
    at a new york road runner race...when healthy i do'em all...you would
    kick my ass have realized something more valuable than money,
    affirming your word. that's what i am going to doug & his whole crew
    of mediocrity in that small pond he dwells in...Spring or Summer. Make
    it happen tony...for yourself.

    ... Actually you're right, it's not about competition for me! I could care
    less about beating any particular person. It was an attempt at a friendly
    wager, not unlike superbowl squares or something. If I were a real betting
    man I'd put up far more than $100 - that's chump change, but I wouldn't make

    I'm with Tony on this one. I think if it's going to be a real bet of any sort,
    you've got to have some stakes, even if they're small. Makes it harder to wimp
    out with a lame excuse.

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  14. "Tom Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    ....

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, an acquaintance of mine, someone I'd climbed
    with, was recently tragically killed pursuing his
    passion on Kilimanjaro and whether one is rich or
    not makes zero difference (he wasn't, and neither
    is any other world class climbers I know.) The
    point being average people of average means aspire
    to and do extraordinary things. And it has nothing
    to do with your idiot opinion.

    Interjecting into this debate -- with due respect, since I don't know your
    friend or his motives, I have to agree with Donovan in part in that many of
    the extreme adventure want-to-be explorers are indeed rich folks or at least
    people with enough connections to finance their quests, meaning they have
    rich supporters.

    There was a show this week on public television about Denali in Alaska. It
    was about why so many climbers die trying to climb the mountain. Well,
    somewhat obviously, it's the altitude combined with being so far north, but
    they were studying the environment's effects on a person's core temperature.
    1000 people attempt Denali every year and there are always deaths. As I
    watched it I thought that probably 900 of the 1000 people who attempt Denali
    every year have no business being there and are rich dumbasses out for
    bragging rights or wanting to be adventurers, some of whom die and many of
    whom come away with severe frostbite.

    There's a full spectrum of motives for people to do extreme things. For
    those who truly love it, they would do it and not brag about it, and would
    know how to do it without undue risk. I judge things somewhat randomly. For
    example, I think it's very cool that they have the iditarod race as I think
    it's a real epic and it keeps a history of the place alive. However, I
    dislike what I consider the publicity minded stunts that Dean K. enjoys
    doing. It could be argued in his case that he's doing it for charity, but
    something tells me it's really more part of his career publicity grand plan
    than charity.

    -Tony

  15. PSSSSSSSSSSSSSYCHO!

    (We See) said:

    and on friday, the monkey well keep the boogie's boards.

    get your own summer gear:
    t.v. late shows......
    I wonder if lightning can shoot out my sweats :
    and electric wire and tips pure from the back. be good for that chick.

    maybe the Yahh bang baby baby song baby baby song.......... with the
    3 guys in the t.v gig in a office danceing to that boom box. baby
    baby
    Johnson ?,?,?>
    cohan walking in N.Y. show......

    and zaps of flsh lightning all around......

    baby baby boom boom .

    Nah never happen in my life time. oh well.........cabin fever must
    be over done here....maybe, ahh get real.......
    probe not?
    falling off a back of a horse would do it...baby baby...... and a
    cowboy hat?........
    boomm boom baby bay......be.....

    falling off back of horse. catch her and find a rock..........
    probe not. truth is she probe wanted to kill me too......

    brought to you by rock finance... The little [censored]
    people..............Detroit pistons.
    agen them dang atlanta u.s.a. Halk..........

    wait a rr tick detroit one.
    strike another for rock.the little [censored] people at rock
    finance.....were you know. a baby baby gets the girl........

    ahhh hell...............

    dang wires..........trash..........

    Stand in line.........

  16. PSSSSSSSSSSSSSYCHO!

    (We See) said:

    in the trails

    LOL funny thing about all these guys.....
    in a real race I well be in the back and a ways into it. we well meet
    up because every time they follow the leader who ends up taking the
    wrong trail. and loses hours......LOL

  17. Tony S. said:

    should have hills, some rough trail sections at least, and not be too short
    so that it's over before the zen of it starts.

    Mindfulness, dude. Feel each and every breath -- each one is a lifetime in
    itself, and a race like the mile will teach you that. Time slows down when
    you are truly concentrating. This would be a truly terrifying thought if you
    were waiting for it to be over, but you're not waiting. You're just living in
    the present, inside the lifetime that is the rise and fall of the current
    breath. The last quarter of a mile race will give you all the zen you ever
    wanted and more. Contemplate that for a while -- maybe during your next long
    run (-;

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi
    http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/

  18. Tony S. said:

    "Tom Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    ...

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, an acquaintance of mine, someone I'd climbed
    with, was recently tragically killed pursuing his
    passion on Kilimanjaro and whether one is rich or
    not makes zero difference (he wasn't, and neither
    is any other world class climbers I know.) The
    point being average people of average means aspire
    to and do extraordinary things. And it has nothing
    to do with your idiot opinion.

    Interjecting into this debate -- with due respect, since I don't know your
    friend or his motives, I have to agree with Donovan in part in that many of
    the extreme adventure want-to-be explorers are indeed rich folks or at least
    people with enough connections to finance their quests, meaning they have
    rich supporters.

    There was a show this week on public television about Denali in Alaska. It
    was about why so many climbers die trying to climb the mountain. Well,
    somewhat obviously, it's the altitude combined with being so far north, but
    they were studying the environment's effects on a person's core temperature.
    1000 people attempt Denali every year and there are always deaths. As I
    watched it I thought that probably 900 of the 1000 people who attempt Denali
    every year have no business being there and are rich dumbasses out for
    bragging rights or wanting to be adventurers, some of whom die and many of
    whom come away with severe frostbite.

    But I wouldn't include them as true climbers. I'd call them
    ecoadventurers or something along those lines. I would agree with Phil
    about the average climber, backpacker, etc. (not ecoadventurer).
    Climbers that I knew from school usually lived in tents in base camp
    (say, Tetons) and just lived hand to mouth. If you don't have many
    expenses, you don't need much income. Heck, one of the guys I knew
    bicycled around the world (maybe 30 yr ago, obviously using boats when
    needed), giving guest talks and working as he went to raise money, then
    wrote a book (The Long Ride). One of my former techs (not rich) became
    the first documented woman to solo Denali the year after she worked for
    me (there was a case many years before but there were many, many
    questions as to whether the earlier one happeneed). Her general
    employment at the time was guiding - Denali (usually working for a
    guiding service) and elsewhere on her own or with husband. No doubt she
    took up some of the 900 that maybe didn't belong there. Some of my local
    friends who have climbed Denali were probably well off (both husband and
    wife worked) while others were below average income. But they definitely
    had jobs with limited vacation time. Of course, some of those I know
    now, just work part time or for non-profits or whatever - just enough to
    pay the bills while they live life to the fullest.

    Some adventurers (not ecoadventurers) may be well off and have good
    connections. But there's some who just have interesting backgrounds /
    aspirations that either do it hand-to-mouth or can get funding.

    And in modern society, there's no doubt many well-off middle-age crisis
    folks that are doing these various adventures and maybe retired early.
    And some may be knowledgeable climbers or whatever but got trapped
    behind a desk.

    Quoted message said:


    There's a full spectrum of motives for people to do extreme things. For
    those who truly love it, they would do it and not brag about it, and would
    know how to do it without undue risk.

    agreed.

    I judge things somewhat randomly. For

    Quoted message said:

    example, I think it's very cool that they have the iditarod race as I think
    it's a real epic and it keeps a history of the place alive.

    Were you aware that the Iditarod sleddog race goes essentially a
    completely different route from the Serum run route, that it supposedly
    commemorates?

    However, I

    Quoted message said:

    dislike what I consider the publicity minded stunts that Dean K. enjoys
    doing. It could be argued in his case that he's doing it for charity, but
    something tells me it's really more part of his career publicity grand plan
    than charity.

    I'm not gonna get into this nonsense on pretending to know what goes
    through runners' minds or bashing other runners, but if you take the
    time to read about some of the other runners, like some you have praised
    in posts to this group, you will find they are not as perfect as you
    seem to imply (some that you have praised do things that I detest).

    But I respect them all as runners. And they all do things that can be
    misinterpreted.

    Dot

    --
    "So many people get stuck in the routine of life that their dreams waste
    away. This is about living the dream." - Cave Dog

  19. Tony S. said:

    "Tom Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    ...

    Quoted message said:

    BTW, an acquaintance of mine, someone I'd climbed
    with, was recently tragically killed pursuing his
    passion on Kilimanjaro and whether one is rich or
    not makes zero difference (he wasn't, and neither
    is any other world class climbers I know.) The
    point being average people of average means aspire
    to and do extraordinary things. And it has nothing
    to do with your idiot opinion.

    Interjecting into this debate -- with due respect, since I don't know your
    friend or his motives, I have to agree with Donovan in part in that many of
    the extreme adventure want-to-be explorers are indeed rich folks or at least
    people with enough connections to finance their quests, meaning they have
    rich supporters.

    There was a show this week on public television about Denali in Alaska. It
    was about why so many climbers die trying to climb the mountain. Well,
    somewhat obviously, it's the altitude combined with being so far north, but
    they were studying the environment's effects on a person's core temperature.
    1000 people attempt Denali every year and there are always deaths. As I
    watched it I thought that probably 900 of the 1000 people who attempt Denali
    every year have no business being there and are rich dumbasses out for
    bragging rights or wanting to be adventurers, some of whom die and many of
    whom come away with severe frostbite.

    Intersting subject on Denali. My father was a mountaineer long before,
    and I mean loonnggg before it was trendy. He climbed Mt. Shasta and Mt.
    Raineer, but decided not to climb Denali because he had two small girls
    (me being one of them) at home. He wasn't going risk his life and the
    chance that he'd leave us fatherless.

    He used to say Denali is tougher much of the time to climb than Everest
    because of the weather, from what he'd read and talked to with other
    climbers.

    Since then, He's been to Alaska traveling many times and has been to
    Everest Base Camp.

    He's now 84 years old and is in perfect health for someone of his
    advanced years.

    I've done some wall and rock climbing a few years ago, though I'd
    really like to climb Shasta maybe next year because Dad did it. : )

    Martha

  20. Black Metal Martha said:

    Intersting subject on Denali.

    Doug is still in denial.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.