Chalo wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>> indestructible. urban. unbeatable economics.
>>
>> http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?category=130&subcategory=1176&bran...
>
> I have been intrigued about those frames for a long time. I have held
> off getting one thus far because the tall sizes are very short in the
> top tube/front center. They might be OK for a drop bar or cowhorn bar
> setup, probably not for a 6.5-footer using flat bars.
>
> It's true that they are the best value I know of in a sturdy, non-
> cheesy 26" wheeled frame.
>
> Chalo
>
I built up one of these for my wife a couple of years ago. The only
negative on the frame is it's heavy, other than that, pretty nice. I,
too, didn't consider one for myself because of the top tube issue. When
I needed a new MTB frame a couple of years back I bought a closeout GT
bike and stripped it. I'm using it now with flat bars (maybe 1" of rise)
and the longest stem I could find, the seatpost is also the longest I
could find ~425mm & I'm at max extension & it flexes noticeably even at
my measly 225lb. My older (aluminum) MTB frame cracked at the seat tube
clamp slot keyhole, but only after 10 years of off-road, most of which
was pulling a ~100lb extra via a trailer bike. I drilled the cracks &
still use it for an errand bike.
I'm OK with low bars, actually prefer them for MTB, as even with the max
size off the shelf frames, with seat posts that long they tend to be
wheelie bikes.
http://home.comcast.net/~peter_cole/Blue_Hills/images/pa030007.jpg