Big Disappointment: Polar S720i Heart Rate Monitor

  • Thread starter Elisa Francesca Roselli
  • Start date



On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:04:47 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> No, I think he probably means this kind of terrorist:
>>
>> — November 1979: Muslim extremists (Iranian variety) seized the U.S.
>> embassy in Iran and held 52 American hostages for 444 days, following
>> Democrat Jimmy Carter's masterful foreign policy granting Islamic
>> fanaticism its first real foothold in the Middle East.
>
>ah! good! i was afraid he was talking about american terrorists, white,
>anglos, good republicans. or worse, the american terrorist state.
>here's a partial list (we can do list too. more at
>http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/)
>but i seriously doubt you'll have the intellectual honesty to step back
>and try to understand.

Bakuni The Looney, here's some of what your link from the SEP
(Socialist Equality Party) suggests:
-------------------------------

The Socialist Equality Party opposes the capitalist system.

Our party fights for the socialist principle that the economy should
be organized democratically to serve the needs of the working class...

The Socialist Equality Party has been formed for the purpose of
mobilizing the working class to end the political rule of the
financial oligarchy and place into power a democratic government of
the workers, for the workers and, above all, by the workers. The
workers government for which we fight would carry out those radical
economic measures necessary to secure the social needs of the people.
It would subordinate the capitalist market to the interests of society
as a whole.

-------------------------------

This Marxist system has been tried many times and has failed
miserably. The political systems that claim to succeed with it all
have one thing in common, a strong "black market" underlying
capitalistic economy that supports their communist regime which then
in reality always becomes a political entity run by "royalty" who live
a lavish lifestyle while those underneath suufer.
 
Bakuni The Loony's post of 7/26/06:

"you are truly brain washed. or just plain stupid. the war in iraq was
justified by doctored intelligence. even republicans with brains
recognized it now. where are the wmd? the "mushroom cloud" and the
rest of the lies? (poor colin powell who ruined what was left of his
reputation with his speech to the u.n.)
iraq a new north korea!? you realy live in a hole. "

This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:

Chuck Schumer > October 10, 2002
"It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear
weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist
acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the
united states."

Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace, and we have
to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the
threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

Madeleine Albright > February 1, 1998 "We must stop Saddam from ever
again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors
with weapons of mass destruction."

Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a
threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002 "We have known for many years that
Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

Jay Rockefeller > October 10, 2002 "There was unmistakable evidence
that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons
and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We
also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress
Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

Joe Biden > August 4, 2002 "[H]e does have the capacity, as all
terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United
States and doing something terrible. That is true. But there's been no
connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his
willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesn't mean he won't. This
is a bad guy."

**** Durbin > September 30, 1999
"One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is
the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments
regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or
some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."


Bill Nelson > August 25, 2002
"[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam
has chemical and biological weapons,
and I expect that he is trying to develop
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,
we might have to act precipitously."

Nancy Pelosi > October 10, 2002
"Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is
trying to get nuclear weapons."

Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
"We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st
Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build
arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles
to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no
more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."


Johnny Edwards > February 6, 2003
"The question is whether we're going to allow this man who's been
developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of
mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where --
if we're going to stop him if he invades a country around him -- it'll
cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives."


Al Gore > September 23, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."


John Kerry > February 23, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear
that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity
and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability
of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of
terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions
near but not exactly in the Middle East."
 
In article <[email protected]>,
R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:

> This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:

blah blah blah said brickston.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:04:59 -0500, "hhs" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> "n5hsr" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Even though my last name is of French origin, and I did take French in
>>
>> Who cares?
>> No need to apologize. You're not what your ancestors were, lucky you,
>> you're just an average american moron.
>>
>> --
>
>I'm sorry, I arrived on this thread a bit late. From in what country did
>say you reside? I suspect you are you British where all the morons are
>above average.
>
Above average in stupidity.
 
hhs wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > R Brickston wrote:
> <snip>
> .................................... they knock
> >> >down 2 towers and 3000+ people.
> >>
> >> So, you approve of the action on Sept. 11?
> >
> > I strongly DISAPPROVE of the actions of September 11, 1973.
> >
>
> So now we wonder if you approve of the al Qaeda attack on the World Trade
> Center on September 11, 2001 based on it was only the Arabs pushing back at
> us or some other leftist we deserved it kind of ****?

I understand the motivation behind the attacks (if it was indeed al
Qaeda or a similar organization), which is more than the people who
claim to be fighting terrorism or the vast majority of the US public
do.

> p.s. (OT)
> Was it your rewriting of history that was responsible for the Chilean coup
> of 1973 page of Wikipedia being locked down?

Maybe it was Henry Kissinger?

--
Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain
 
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:43:49 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:
>
>blah blah blah said brickston.

What, no comment? Is your brain incapable of any /original/ creative
thought process at all? Because I read through the political lunacy
fomented by the web authors on the link you posted and your spew here
is just a regurgitation of what the /real/ lunatics scribbled.

Your nothing but a wannabe copy-cat venom spitter and when faced with
undeniable facts which put you way out of your very shallow political
depth, you have to beg off.
 
In article <[email protected]>,
R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:

> The political systems that claim to succeed with it all
> have one thing in common, a strong "black market" underlying
> capitalistic economy

at last, you come up with an honest description of the american system.
goodness, i thought you'll never understand what it means when
halliburton gets the huge contracts without bids, when every week sees
an other politician falling in disgrace about some scam.
you are truly pitiful, vouching for a political system where every
single u.s. senator is a millionaire, where the congress refuses to
raise the minimum wage, but votes an 11,000 dollars raise for the
congressmen, where laws are written by the lobbyists,for their clients
who own the politicians. the only thing that keeps your system together
is greed. the question is: for how long?

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <_VHKg.15125$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Apparently it never made the American news
>
> like so many things. between the media self-imposed censorship, the one
> imposed by the government and the lack of interest by the populace, one
> seeking information will find more propaganda than information.
> now, if morons (like dolan and brickston) could read anything else than
> american, they may get educated by reading the foreign press websites. i
> guess if they were interested they could read it anyway on the websites
> written in english. but that would mean they have a real interest in
> finding out what is really going in the world.
>
This is why I have shortwave radios that glow in the dark. I get the
news directly from the country that is broadcasting and it is definitely
not always in praise of the (semi) United States. I don't know if the
CIA or whoever can block Internet access to sites they don't like, but I
wouldn't put it past them. In the cold war days the Soviets used to
broadcast hash noise at about a million watts to cover stations they
didn't like. It was like tuning into a buzz saw. If the US starts doing
that then I know the **** is going to hit the fan.
Bill Baka
 
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:53:42 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> The political systems that claim to succeed with it all
>> have one thing in common, a strong "black market" underlying
>> capitalistic economy
>
>at last, you come up with an honest description of the american system.
>goodness, i thought you'll never understand what it means when
>halliburton gets the huge contracts without bids, when every week sees
>an other politician falling in disgrace about some scam.
>you are truly pitiful, vouching for a political system where every
>single u.s. senator is a millionaire, where the congress refuses to
>raise the minimum wage, but votes an 11,000 dollars raise for the
>congressmen, where laws are written by the lobbyists,for their clients
>who own the politicians.

Your description is simply another regurgitation of the web site you
posted, so there's no sense trying to debate you. However, I do have a
comment on this statement:

>the only thing that keeps your system together is greed.
>the question is: for how long?

Absolutely correct, that is the main element of the capital system
from the lowest worker to the highest earner. The communist leaders
didn't want to figure this out because they were operating their own
personal economy, for their own personal benefit.

It didn't matter how well the assembly line worker in the USSR did his
work, he was always going to live in a **** apartment with the same
**** pay. There was no incentive to do well, hence most did not
bother.

I'd pontificate further, but to explain it to you is just a waste
time.

Anybody on this thread ever traveled from West to East Berlin during
the "Wall" decades and went just a little past the glitz facade the
East German communists put up around Check Point Charlie?
 
In article <[email protected]>,
R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:

> Above average in stupidity.

funny how when you're short of a valid answer you resort to insult.
typical fascistic technique.
calling people stupid doesn't make you right. but make people wonder
about your honesty.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> The political systems that claim to succeed with it all
>> have one thing in common, a strong "black market" underlying
>> capitalistic economy
>
> at last, you come up with an honest description of the american system.
> goodness, i thought you'll never understand what it means when
> halliburton gets the huge contracts without bids, when every week sees
> an other politician falling in disgrace about some scam.
> you are truly pitiful, vouching for a political system where every
> single u.s. senator is a millionaire, where the congress refuses to
> raise the minimum wage, but votes an 11,000 dollars raise for the
> congressmen, where laws are written by the lobbyists,for their clients
> who own the politicians. the only thing that keeps your system together
> is greed. the question is: for how long?
>
Probably not as long as the corrupt elite at the top think. I have seen
very little thought given to the problems within the US from this
administration, but plenty of blah, blah, blah, about creating a
Democracy in Iraq. We are going bankrupt trying to give (force)
something that they don't want. Meanwhile we have television ads begging
for money to help the poor little starving African children while we
have plenty of poor, starving children right here. I don't hold much
hope for the American way of life lasting much longer. All the
presidents that I can recall have talked about reducing the deficit, and
not one of them has had the guts to mention that as long as we have a
deficit, the national debt keeps going up. I think China holds a note on
about 2 trillion dollars of our debt, and as long as we keep investing
there for cheap labor and putting Americans out of work, it will only
get worse.
The politicians are getting rich, but I can see the end of the tunnel
and it isn't light, but rather black at the end.
Bill Baka

BTW, what ever happened to the bicycle posts???
I went for a ride today at least. What about you guys?
 
M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> Above average in stupidity.
>
> funny how when you're short of a valid answer you resort to insult.
> typical fascistic technique.
> calling people stupid doesn't make you right. but make people wonder
> about your honesty.
>
Have you watched Bush in a press conference? He comes back with the same
snappy one liners too.
Bill Baka
 
In article <anJKg.15144$%[email protected]>,
Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

> Have you watched Bush in a press conference? He comes back with the same
> snappy one liners too.

that what the brain washed republicans are conditioned to do.
brikston is the perfect example.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 18:19:08 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <anJKg.15144$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Have you watched Bush in a press conference? He comes back with the same
>> snappy one liners too.
>
>that what the brain washed republicans are conditioned to do.
>brikston is the perfect example.

Just reply to the content then, of course, it's easier to whine "He
called me a name, boo hoo...." then have to explain how quotes that
are in the historical record from three years ago somehow are
"fabrications."
 
"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <zMHKg.15122$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have seen some bicycles that bombed, but bicycle bombs?????
>
> it's been used many times already. in the 80's in front of a synagogue
> in paris. and more recently on august 30 in iraq in front of an army
> recruiting center in Hillah (12 dead).
> so it's just recycling an old idea.
>
> --

that should be hillah
 
In article <[email protected]>,
"hhs" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > recruiting center in Hillah (12 dead).
> > so it's just recycling an old idea.
> >
> > --
>
> that should be hillah

bravo!
sorry, i meant Bravo!

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 20:19:51 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "hhs" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > recruiting center in Hillah (12 dead).
>> > so it's just recycling an old idea.
>> >
>> > --
>>
>> that should be hillah
>
>bravo!
>sorry, i meant Bravo!

Could this troll flame bait be any more obvious?
 
In article <AGLKg.15178$%[email protected]>,
Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

> You guys need your own "Chat" room.
> Baka

no. i'm through trying to inculcate some sense to this retard.
i'll just ignore him, and save bandwith for everybody.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
 
M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <AGLKg.15178$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You guys need your own "Chat" room.
>> Baka
>
> no. i'm through trying to inculcate some sense to this retard.
> i'll just ignore him, and save bandwith for everybody.
>
I kill filed him, but it was fun watching. There hasn't been enough bike
related stuff on here lately. With all the links posted though I did
find some interesting political sites.
I think I will go browse now and sign off for the night.
Bill Baka
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Re: Big Disappointment: Polar S720i Heart Rate Monitor
Replies
0
Views
351
Road Cycling
Roger Houston
R
R
Re: Big Disappointment: Polar S720i Heart Rate Monitor
Replies
0
Views
401
Road Cycling
Roger Houston
R
gary-trek
If height is a big factor in cycling explain lance Armstrong
Replies
26
Views
5K
Road Cycling
treecko142
treecko142
loly222
Crossin Big Roandabouts, Like cheese
Replies
5
Views
1K
Road Cycling
loly222
loly222
FHII
Big hill catagory
Replies
4
Views
700
Road Cycling
FHII
FHII
Top Bottom Back