"DA74" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
> Tom Kunich wrote:
>> "DA74" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >> But was it the drugs?
>> >
>> > Ask Mr 60+
>>
>> I find that statement interesting. What the hell do you know about
>> it? SOMEONE was called Mr. 60% and someone else suggested
>> that it was Riis. But I NEVER saw anything that indicated that it
>> was anything more than a rumor and there were riders tested at
>> the time who were 60%.
>>
>> So by all means give us a reliable citation of where Riis was the Mr.
>> 60% that was mentioned.
>
> First I'll make my last reply to TK and then get on to the rest of you.
> Tom, I don't know jack. And I wouldn't post it here anyway. Of course
> you NEVER saw anything more than a rumor, because you're a fan and
> that's it. Why the hell would anyone risk losing friends by going
> public about something like that? Especially to freds like you?
> By the way it wasn't 60 either. It was 60+.
Not to be too critical of your posting Dave but you can die with 60+ very
easily. I also note that Benjo mentioned that Ferrari's records only showed
Riis at 56%. That that is pretty much conclusive evidence that he was using
EPO, but was the playing field flat? Yes. Will a clean rider beat the
records set by the mid-90's dopers? Yes.
This senseless knocking of anyone that "isn't me" is pretty disgusting.
Isn't this a bicycle racing discussion group? Or is it your ***** session
about people who are better than you are?
Just because two bit assholes like chimp and CP want to spend their time
knocking other riders ain't a signal that it's the thing to do for all you
easily impressed wannabees.
