On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:08:53 -0000, "JBB" <
[email protected]>
wrote:
> Differences are largely be that the cheaper options tend to be offered as
>a complete package and are instantly available whereas others can be
>customised to your needs plus of course you can pay a bit more and have the
>frame made to measure; these obviously take a bit longer. If you give us an
>idea about your intended budget and use we'll probably be able to offer more
>specific advice. Personally I had a made to measure frame built up by my LBS
>with components all of my choosing but it's not the route for everyone.
A year ago, I had one bike for all purposes; a lightweight flat barred
Ridgeback. I used it for commuting and for >100 mile rides.
In June I wanted a new bike just to see if I was physically capable of
riding so bought a Halfords special which could later (now) become a
utilitarian hack and commute. It's actually not a bad bike but now
that I want to try and get fit again and try for some longer
distances, I'd like something more appropriate.
As I already have a utility bike, for the first time ever I'm looking
for a single purpose machine rather than an all rounder. I hope to get
back up to covering 100 miles and more. It won't be used every day so
I'll be happy to give it the cleaning and care that my day-to-day
bikes rarely get.
I'm not interested in heavy load carrying but would want to be able to
take *something* (unlike pure race bikes).
I'm not really working to a budget but I don't like wasteful
expenditure. Spending £4k on a carbon-everything would be wasted on
me! OK, let's put a figure on it; say £1750. But I'm not ruling out a
£600 off the peg bike just because I could spend more.
Finally, for all the wrong reasons, I would like a light bike.