D
Doug Taylor
Guest
[email protected] (James Annan) wrote:
>Of course if someone comes back to them with any new evidence, they might reopen the case. The ASTM
>said several months ago that they would look into this 'in due course' but they do not seem to have
>done anything in the interim and are certainly not a consumer protection organisation. More likely,
>they will invent a new inconvenient wheel attachment method, foist it on all cyclists including
>road bike users, and I'll get blamed for that too.
It's all about YOU, eh, James?
BTW, this post comes closer to the definition of "troll" than those to which you have referred
recently. Save it for future reference. --dt
>Of course if someone comes back to them with any new evidence, they might reopen the case. The ASTM
>said several months ago that they would look into this 'in due course' but they do not seem to have
>done anything in the interim and are certainly not a consumer protection organisation. More likely,
>they will invent a new inconvenient wheel attachment method, foist it on all cyclists including
>road bike users, and I'll get blamed for that too.
It's all about YOU, eh, James?
BTW, this post comes closer to the definition of "troll" than those to which you have referred
recently. Save it for future reference. --dt