if this is the best explanation, based on cause and effect factors, that the 9/11 attacks could have indeed resulted in the aftermath that ensued, then i am beginning to seriously doubt the whole story of the attack.
www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_1253.shtml
the evidence does not now and cannot ever rule out intentional destruction, controlled demolition and bomb detonations.
far too many inconsistencies are taken for granted, too many laws of physics are ignored to come to any other conclusion.
bush looking for the perpetrators is perhaps as valid as oj simpson looking for the real killers.
the ones who would have us believe it all came down as the mythology reported by the press are the real conspiracy theorists, based on their flawed reasoning in the face of the physical evidence.
www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_1253.shtml
the evidence does not now and cannot ever rule out intentional destruction, controlled demolition and bomb detonations.
far too many inconsistencies are taken for granted, too many laws of physics are ignored to come to any other conclusion.
bush looking for the perpetrators is perhaps as valid as oj simpson looking for the real killers.
the ones who would have us believe it all came down as the mythology reported by the press are the real conspiracy theorists, based on their flawed reasoning in the face of the physical evidence.