What's up with this newspaper claims that EPO was detected in a urine sample of Lance Armstrong back in 1999?
Why the srutiny after so long?
Can they prove this claim in a correct and scientific manner, erasing any doubts or speculations pro or con?!
I wish that the press and anyone with such potentially harmful claims would get their facts straight first, before publishing an article like that, since it definitely compromises their credibility and professional integrity.
Lance Armstrong denies such claims, and I believe him. He has a "super-human" cardio-respiratory physiology that most lay people confound for "steroids" enhanced cycling performance. Chris Carmichael vouches for this medical fact, and also has the diagnostics facts in writting. DQ
Why the srutiny after so long?
Can they prove this claim in a correct and scientific manner, erasing any doubts or speculations pro or con?!
I wish that the press and anyone with such potentially harmful claims would get their facts straight first, before publishing an article like that, since it definitely compromises their credibility and professional integrity.
Lance Armstrong denies such claims, and I believe him. He has a "super-human" cardio-respiratory physiology that most lay people confound for "steroids" enhanced cycling performance. Chris Carmichael vouches for this medical fact, and also has the diagnostics facts in writting. DQ