> The pin you push out and then back in is now deformed and the chances
> to break a chain there is huge!
>
> It isn't the side plate, since that holds a new pin, but the pin
> itself. i don't think i would recommend doing this.
If you're on the trail and your chain fails, and you have no extra pin, it's
a better idea than pushing your bike back home. We're not talking about
pushing the disposable connecting pin out, but rather one of the standard
pins used everywhere else in the chain. Yes, it will mushroom the link a
bit, and yes, it is nowhere near as strong, and yes, it will fail down the
road. But in all likelihood it will get you home.
I've never broken a chain on the road (or trail), ever. But I have done
emergency repairs for a number of people who have.
Perhaps I should have worded differently the part where I said "it should
hold for as long as it takes to either replace the chain or get the proper
replacement pins." I should have said it should hold until you get home,
period, at which point you replace the chain.
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
"Qui si parla Campagnolo" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
>
> Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
>> > The more expensive ones are actually worse because the pins can't
>> > be driven out or back in without destroying the side plates. Chain
>> > breakage is rare, but when it happens it's nice to be able to repair it
>> > on
>> > the road easily.
>> >
>> > Matt O.
>>
>> In a pinch, a standard chain tool can still be used to push out (and back
>> in
>> place) pins in a chain with "bulging" side plates, such as a Shimano and,
>> presumably, the new SRAM units. It's not ideal, but it should hold for as
>> long as it takes to either replace the chain or get the proper
>> replacement
>> pins.
>>
>> --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
>> www.ChainReactionBicycles.com
>
> The pin you push out and then back in is now deformed and the chances
> to break a chain there is huge!
>
> It isn't the side plate, since that holds a new pin, but the pin
> itself. i don't think i would recommend doing this.
>