Helmets: to wear, or not to wear?

Discussion in 'Cycling Equipment' started by framism, Apr 24, 2006.

  1. framism

    framism New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    We assume that. I'm now not totally convinced that they do. Did you read the whole website, or just that page? It's very interesting, no matter the choice to wear a helmet or not.

    I believe what is being referred to is not the individual, but the group. For every safety aware individual like yourself, there's an individual who doesn't even consider safety. That individual, when wearing a helmet, is likely to "risk compensate".

    This data - from Sécurité Routière; CERTU (Centre d'études sur les réseaux, les transports, l'urbanisme et les consturctions publiques). March 2005. - suggests otherwise.

    The health benefits of cycling are the same whether a helmet is being worn or not. That is, if one is cycling. This is the concern for compulsory helmet legislation; it reduces the number of cyclists. Going bare-headed does not increase the risk of something unhealthy occurring. If one is in an accident, wearing a helmet may well counter some damage, but the issue is contentious enough not to be able to state it as fact.

    It implies that wearing a helmet does not necessarily make you safe. I see the information being there for us to make an informed choice to wear a helmet or not.

    Totally. Awareness is the bedrock of safety.
     


  2. framism

    framism New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks Insight Driver, some informative and balanced information. Cheers!

    I especially enjoyed this:

    and

     
  3. daniels

    daniels New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jeez, isnt it obvious that wearing a helmet is safer than not? I simply can't understand why anyone would think that riding without a helmet is safer. Sure, helmets aren't perfect, and in some cases nothing will help you (like getting hit by a semi trailer) but some protection is surely better than nothing.

    As for the "stories" about bareheaded cyclists surviving crashes... what do they prove? Are you saying that a cyclist with a helmet on wouldn't survive the same crash?

    Oh, and yes, I have been hit by a car before. My helmet cracked down the side and I didn't even suffer a concussion. I think I would have been worse off if I wasn't wearing a helmet don't you? My brother probably would have been seriously injured as a child if he wasn't wearing a helmet when riding a bike as well.
     
  4. framism

    framism New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    The "stories" of unhelmeted riders surviving crashes proves as much as the stories of helmeted riders surviving crashes: absolutely nothing. A cracked helmet does not necessarily imply that the skull would have been cracked if a helmet hadn't been worn; a cracked helmet equals a cracked helmet, nothing more, nothing less.

    Last week I went to a meeting in central London. I saw messenger after messenger, many of whom weren't wearing helmets. At the time I thought, what crazy fools they are to be zipping around dense traffic without wearing one! Now, after reading a variety of information of the effectiveness of bike helmets and gaining a rudimentary understanding of the science of bike helmets, I'm not so quick to think them crazy fools. I'm not convinced that I should wear a helmet, but nor am I convinced that I'm safer without them; I choose, for now, not to wear a helmet because I realise that I ride more riskily when wearing one than when I am not.

    framism
     
  5. dhk

    dhk New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,259
    Likes Received:
    0
    Read the policy page of the website, which said they are concerned that helmet promotion labels cycling as a dangerous activity, and hence discourages new riders. The fact is that yes, cycling is a dangerous activity. All new potential riders should be warned that they face serious injury or death every time they go on the road.

    The data you quoted on head injury rates looks very questionable also. Here's a link you may want to study: http://www.helmets.org/stats.htm Note the % of cycling deaths due to traumatic brain injury in the US, as well as the relative number of fatalities of cyclists with and without helmets.

    Again, it's your choice whether you want to bear the risk of cycling without a helmet, but the arguement that you're as safe or safer without one just doesn't fly anymore.
     
  6. framism

    framism New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    0
    Definitely worth visiting both for balance; helmets.org is pro-helmet, whereas cyclehelmets.org tends to lean the other way:

     
  7. Insight Driver

    Insight Driver New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    494
    Likes Received:
    1
    Let us try to constrain this debate into one narrow question: Will there be less deaths by cyclists in a population where everyone wears helmets versus a population where no one wears a helmet? Look all over for statistics that would give weight to the answer one way or another. Filter out all other factors. Would the answer be that helmets will save some cyclists from death?

    What percentage of cyclists will have a head injury while cycling? In all my years of riding and crashing I've never bumped my head. I have always worn a helmet, except when I was a child since helmet laws were not in existance at that time.

    Filter out all the debate and the choice really boils down to perceived risk. Those who perceive the risk is too low to justify wearing a helmet versus those who perceive the risk high enough to justify wearing a helmet. Anything that adds to that choice is just rationalizing the decision.
     
Loading...
Loading...