Been thinking lots about Bassons this week.Originally Posted by limerickman .
In terms of the sporting legacy and the charity work legacy, I think the above statement is spot on.
I would hope that the authorities weigh up Armstrong's demeanour when allegations of his having cheated were made - when deliberating on the sanction to be imposed on Armstrong.
I hope that the authorities weigh up the vendetta that Armstrong launched against riders, former riders, former team employees, and journalists who were courageous enough to pursue the evidence of his having doped - when deliberating on the sanction to be imposed on Armstrong.
Armstrong chatted for a few minutes before saying, "[COLOR= rgb(0, 0, 205)]OK, I'm going to go eat a cheeseburger[/COLOR]."Originally Posted by CAMPYBOB .
In other Lance News today...
Dateline: Aspen, Colorado http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/48788983/ns/sports-cycling/
not at all do i feel that the same level of justice would apply or that they are equally evil. the point here is that even the most hated, despised, and rightfully vilified individual that walked the earth actually accomplished good. what i am driving at with this is for all the good things armstrong and his foundation have done, you have to separate that from the actions he took in his career as a cyclist. admittedly, the theoretical mobster we wrote of above would probably have merited some leniency in sentencing given his turn from the illegal life and doing whatever good he did in the years after. that would not excuse or absolve the former thug from responsibility for his crimes, but would make us somewhat more merciful in our punishment as a society--say, for example, life in prison with a chance at parole instead of the death penalty.Originally Posted by nonns .
****** was a mass murdered. La is allegedly a cheating sportsman. The two hardly constitute the same degree of evil. You feel that the same level of justic ought to apply do you? Let's restart the Nuremberg trials for doping cyclists. Sod the idea of banning them just hang em high. That might cause them to rethink whether they'll dope.
there was no intent on placing ****** in any ranking of german statesmen. the point being that terrible people sometimes do good, while conversely good people sometimes make grievous errors. the point being that armstrong has had some measure of impact on cancer research (a debatable point, to say the least). yet should that work, however noble, be in any way a mitigating factor in his behaviour as a cyclist or the punishment meted out for his doping?Originally Posted by jhuskey .
Despite all the fears of Lance's demise killing cycling I tooks a ride yesterday and the bike still worked. Yes, if ****** had died in 1938 he would have died the greatest statesman Germany had ever had. He just lived too long. Jan was crushed by the German media.
how so? did they unilaterally invoke a secret clause that non-analytical evidence could lead to a ban? did they only recently come to enforce the anti-doping codes on u.s. cyclists this summer? did they not offer armstrong a chance to answer the allegations? did they limit his right to appeal the decision rendered by the three member arbitration panel to the c.a.s.?Originally Posted by jpr95 .
The mitigating factor should be that the USADA is a bunch of lunkheads who keep moving the bar and changing the rules long after the fact. It's like they imitated the legal systems in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and the like to fashion their modus operandi.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.