S
Steve Palincsar
Guest
On Mon, 19 May 2003 14:47:54 -0400, Julia Goolia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why is there a difference between male bikes and female bikes? The difference seems very stupid to
> me. It also seems like the female bike should be for a male because of the cross bar. Is it
> ok/normal for a male to ride a female bike and vice versa?
I presume by "male" and "female" bikes you are referring to bikes with and without top tubes. The
shortest possible answer is, "skirts". The only reason for no top tube is to allow the cyclist to
ride while wearing a skirt or dress. If you're not wearing a skirt, why use a less efficient
frame design?
> Hi,
>
> Why is there a difference between male bikes and female bikes? The difference seems very stupid to
> me. It also seems like the female bike should be for a male because of the cross bar. Is it
> ok/normal for a male to ride a female bike and vice versa?
I presume by "male" and "female" bikes you are referring to bikes with and without top tubes. The
shortest possible answer is, "skirts". The only reason for no top tube is to allow the cyclist to
ride while wearing a skirt or dress. If you're not wearing a skirt, why use a less efficient
frame design?