Re: 2.60 a frickin gallon!



Hobbes wrote:

> Dopey ******* wrote:
>
>>Hobbes, I hate to break it to you, but I suspect you'll find most
>>people think the entire Monica scandal as nothing more than
>>right-wing conservatives having made a mountain out of a mole-hill
>>for attempted political gain.
>
>
> Him adulterously boning a kid 1/3 his age is pathetic; but his own
> business. Him lying about it to a grand jury and independant counsel is
> felonious. Both speak to his lack of moral character.
>
>
>
>>As neither a left/liberal or
>>right/conservative, while I really didn't care for Clinton's
>>politics, I care for Bush's even less. *Far* less.
>
>
> Both sucked moose ****. Clinton was a glorified pedophile and criminal;
> Bushtard II was a coke ***** and alcoholic.
>
>
>
>>I bet that if
>>Clinton were running against Bush today, Clinton would easily walk
>>away the winner.
>
>
> God, why don't Americans take 20 minutes out of their lives and surf the
> Libertarian website? If every American spent 30 minutes researching
> Libertarian policies; it would be the end of Dumbocrats and Republiscum.

We do, but it's obvious that they are all closet Nazis like you,
who make up stuff on the fly, and think that it's worse to have
an affair than it is to start another Vietnam war.
 
Hobbes wrote:

> The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>
>>I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are many
>>candidates, none with a chance.
>
>
> A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.

Last I heard Colin Powell was just as fed up with the BS
as Al Gore.
 
Mike Visceglia wrote:

> pieface wrote:
>
>> Hobbes wrote:
>>
>>> The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are many
>>>> candidates, none with a chance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>>
>>>
>> I like McCain, but Powell???
>
>
>
> Powell's the smart one.
> No wonder you like McCain.
> He too is an idiot.
>
> Now if it were a "Powell/McCain ticket", with Powell as President, then
> it would be 42+ states in favor of them.
> But I think Powell is to humble to take such a landslide win, even with
> that idiot McCain as a running mate.
>
> A better choice would be a Powell and Christine Whitman combo.
> That alone would be a 49+ State win!

Christine "Tax Credit for Creating a Superfund Site" Whitman?
I don't think so ...
 
James L. Pierce wrote:

> McVey was NOT a republican terrorist, he was terrorist with ties to OBL who
> used waco as an excuse
>
The claims of ties to Osama had no facts behind them. His
involvement with the infrastructure of the GOP throughout
his entire life can be documented.
 
pieface wrote:

> Glad I probrobly will cancel your vote dumbass.

You live in Florida.
...or wish to.

You are too stupid to vote for yourself... let alone know how to cancel
anothers.
 
Mike Visceglia wrote:

> pieface wrote:
>
>> Glad I probrobly will cancel your vote dumbass.
>
>
> You live in Florida.
> ...or wish to.
>
> You are too stupid to vote for yourself... let alone know how to cancel
> anothers.
>
>
Are you a Dago?
 
The Bill Rodgers wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:30:59 GMT, "Hobbes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The guy was an adultering scumbag with a
>> hidden agenda and a penchant for little girls 1/3 his age.
>
> He's my hero...

Come near my kids, and I will put a bullet in your head. Guaranteed.
 
The Bill Rodgers wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:33:00 GMT, "Hobbes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> He did not catch anything, assnozzle. FBI and local PD found
>> McVeigh and Nichols.
>
> Not true. I read that Bill Clinton PERSONALLY spearheaded the
> investigation, and was the driving force behind the scenes in the
> McVeigh investigation, and personally raided MacVeigh''s house to
> arrest him.

Prove it. Show me the video's of Bubba kicking in McVeigh's front door with
the arrest warrant clenched in his teeth.

]
 
The Bill Rodgers wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:40:17 GMT, "Hobbes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>
> A darkie in the white house? Never happen.

Powell is in there now.
 
Hobbes wrote:

> The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:40:17 GMT, "Hobbes" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>
>>A darkie in the white house? Never happen.
>
>
> Powell is in there now.
>
>
>
I thought he resigned.
 
pieface wrote:
> Hobbes wrote:
>
>> The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>>
>>> I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are
>>> many candidates, none with a chance.
>>
>>
>> A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>
>>
> I like McCain, but Powell???

Powell would take the minority vote. Speaking of McCain (who I also had
respect for until recently) - turns out he is a dirtball of Clintonesque
proportions. Go on google and check out "John McCain + Charles Keating".
Turns out McCain was the scumbag that was at the center of the Savings and
Loan scandal that cost taxpayers billions upon billions. McCain, Keating,
and three others were called the Keating Five. Here is a decent overall
article on MSN. Hope that it is informative for you:
http://slate.msn.com/id/1004633/#ContinueArticle



--
___________________
Klecko's Komrades
Rocking it live in 2005
 
Hobbes wrote:

> pieface wrote:
>
>>Hobbes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are
>>>>many candidates, none with a chance.
>>>
>>>
>>>A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I like McCain, but Powell???
>
>
> Powell would take the minority vote. Speaking of McCain (who I also had
> respect for until recently) - turns out he is a dirtball of Clintonesque
> proportions. Go on google and check out "John McCain + Charles Keating".
> Turns out McCain was the scumbag that was at the center of the Savings and
> Loan scandal that cost taxpayers billions upon billions. McCain, Keating,
> and three others were called the Keating Five. Here is a decent overall
> article on MSN. Hope that it is informative for you:
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1004633/#ContinueArticle
>
>
>
Very informative, thanks.
 
Hobbes wrote:

> pieface wrote:
>
>>Hobbes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are
>>>>many candidates, none with a chance.
>>>
>>>
>>>A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I like McCain, but Powell???
>
>
> Powell would take the minority vote. Speaking of McCain (who I also had
> respect for until recently) - turns out he is a dirtball of Clintonesque
> proportions. Go on google and check out "John McCain + Charles Keating".
> Turns out McCain was the scumbag that was at the center of the Savings and
> Loan scandal that cost taxpayers billions upon billions. McCain, Keating,
> and three others were called the Keating Five. Here is a decent overall
> article on MSN. Hope that it is informative for you:
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1004633/#ContinueArticle
>
>
>
Very informative, thanks.
 
Hobbes wrote:

> pieface wrote:
>
>>Hobbes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are
>>>>many candidates, none with a chance.
>>>
>>>
>>>A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I like McCain, but Powell???
>
>
> Powell would take the minority vote. Speaking of McCain (who I also had
> respect for until recently) - turns out he is a dirtball of Clintonesque
> proportions. Go on google and check out "John McCain + Charles Keating".
> Turns out McCain was the scumbag that was at the center of the Savings and
> Loan scandal that cost taxpayers billions upon billions. McCain, Keating,
> and three others were called the Keating Five. Here is a decent overall
> article on MSN. Hope that it is informative for you:
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1004633/#ContinueArticle
>
>
>
Very informative, thanks.
 
Hobbes wrote:

> pieface wrote:
>
>>Hobbes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The Bill Rodgers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I know...but nobody cares because he won't be elected. There are
>>>>many candidates, none with a chance.
>>>
>>>
>>>A McCain / Powell ticket would take 40+ states.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I like McCain, but Powell???
>
>
> Powell would take the minority vote. Speaking of McCain (who I also had
> respect for until recently) - turns out he is a dirtball of Clintonesque
> proportions. Go on google and check out "John McCain + Charles Keating".
> Turns out McCain was the scumbag that was at the center of the Savings and
> Loan scandal that cost taxpayers billions upon billions. McCain, Keating,
> and three others were called the Keating Five. Here is a decent overall
> article on MSN. Hope that it is informative for you:
> http://slate.msn.com/id/1004633/#ContinueArticle
>
>
>
Very informative, thanks.
 
pieface wrote:
> Hobbes wrote:
>> Powell is in there now.
>
> I thought he resigned.

Then who's hand is in Bushtard's ass; making the lips move?
 
pieface wrote:
> Hobbes wrote:
>> Powell would take the minority vote. Speaking of McCain (who I also
>> had respect for until recently) - turns out he is a dirtball of
>> Clintonesque proportions. Go on google and check out "John McCain +
>> Charles Keating". Turns out McCain was the scumbag that was at the
>> center of the Savings and Loan scandal that cost taxpayers billions
>> upon billions. McCain, Keating, and three others were called the
>> Keating Five. Here is a decent overall article on MSN. Hope that
>> it is informative for you:
>> http://slate.msn.com/id/1004633/#ContinueArticle
> Very informative, thanks.

It certainly bummed me out. Even the war heroes were crooks once they
became politicians. Who is left with any honor? John Glenn perhaps; but
he has to be like 100 years old by now.
 
Hobbes wrote:
> pieface wrote:
>
>>Hobbes wrote:
>>
>>>Powell is in there now.
>>
>>I thought he resigned.
>
>
> Then who's hand is in Bushtard's ass; making the lips move?
>
>
>
>
Rumsfeld?
 
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:40:53 GMT, Dave Head <[email protected]> wrote:

>>Believe me, TBR, there never was a budget surplus.
>>
>>However, that does not discount the fact that Bush put us deeply debt.
>>You'll get no argument from me in that regard.
>>
>>Ed Cregger
>
>Yeah - instead of sitting back and doing nothing after the twin towers were
>destroyed, he spent some money with our military and kicked some Arab ass.
>Sure, Clinton wouldn't have had such an expense, 'cuz he wouldn't have done
>anything about it (again).

Sorry, but I have to point out some discrepancies in your statement.
First, clinton would have had an expense, it would have been to the
UN. He would have given them money to "defend against terrorism",
which would have been forwarded to SH by france and germany. Second,
you neglect to mention that Bush had to spend so much money because
clinton decimated our military over 8 years. Remember the first few
days of the Iraq war, when the media talked about how we only had
enough bombs and missiles for a couple days? Why do you think it took
so much money? Third, Bush did not kick any Arab ass, he kicked
terrorist ass. Unlike clinton who bombed civilians and embassies as
he saw fit. You know, those aspirin factories are evil.

So on one hand we had the ******** clinton, who broke all kinds of
laws, including the one that forbids him from using the SS money to
offset the budget deficit, who killed our men and women by handing
them over to the UN and allowing them to get shot at with zero armor
or support in Somalia, and increased spending on every social program
(read wasteful endeavor) that he could get through congress.

On the other hand we have Bush, who has done his best to work with the
idiot dimocrats in congress, has done what he could to provide armor
to our soldiers in spite of the fact that ***** clinton, john kerry
and all the other dimocrats keep voting against all funding bills for
the military, has done what he could to get other countries to stand
with us against terrorism, and succeeded by putting together the
largest coalition of nations ever assembled, has destroyed thousands
of terrorists and terrorist bases, and prevented terrorists from
striking in the US since the one event the terrorists planned under
clintons watch.

Further, considering the budget is still 60% social programs, which
are unconstitutional, and the military takes up a much smaller
percentage, which is one of the few things the government is supposed
to spend money on, I don't see how the media can get away with blaming
Bush for everything. Except that they are of course controlled by the
dimocrats.
 
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:50:14 GMT, "Hobbes" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>sunk so deep into your ass that his balls seem like yours. So what is it
>that has you thinking that an impeached adulterant pedophile with a

Again - clinton was an asshole and a dumbass, but he was not a
pedophile. Remember the dimocrats think what he did was fine, so
calling him a pedophile puts all our children in danger.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back