M
MJ Ray
Guest
"Dave Larrington" <[email protected]>
> http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article1362350.ece
> Usual nonse from an FLJS too lazy to do any research. Probably not worth
> the dignity of a reply; it might make him think people /care/ about what he
> writes ;-)
Proabably not, but I did anyway:
Sean O'Grady disputes that cycling is safe and quick, but doesn't give
any figures, which should make any reader suspicious. There are no
figures because the figures clearly refute the argument: there were
2,895 cyclist casualties in 2005, but 14,779 car casualties (London Road
Safety Unit 12 month summary, published May 2006); and the average
journey time over 4 miles in central London is 22 minutes for a bicycle,
but 40 minutes for a car (TfL Street Management Speed Facts). Cycling
is both safe and quick - and with London finally getting long-needed
road improvements, it is getting safer and quicker.
The author also seems to suggest that all cyclists are uninsured and
should be banned from the roads for paying no vehicle tax. Many cyclists
are covered by their home insurance or specialist providers, and would
the Independent give space to a campaign to ban low-emission cars from
the roads because they also pay zero vehicle tax now?
This type of research-free ranting should have no place in good
newspapers.
--
MJR/slef
> http://motoring.independent.co.uk/comment/article1362350.ece
> Usual nonse from an FLJS too lazy to do any research. Probably not worth
> the dignity of a reply; it might make him think people /care/ about what he
> writes ;-)
Proabably not, but I did anyway:
Sean O'Grady disputes that cycling is safe and quick, but doesn't give
any figures, which should make any reader suspicious. There are no
figures because the figures clearly refute the argument: there were
2,895 cyclist casualties in 2005, but 14,779 car casualties (London Road
Safety Unit 12 month summary, published May 2006); and the average
journey time over 4 miles in central London is 22 minutes for a bicycle,
but 40 minutes for a car (TfL Street Management Speed Facts). Cycling
is both safe and quick - and with London finally getting long-needed
road improvements, it is getting safer and quicker.
The author also seems to suggest that all cyclists are uninsured and
should be banned from the roads for paying no vehicle tax. Many cyclists
are covered by their home insurance or specialist providers, and would
the Independent give space to a campaign to ban low-emission cars from
the roads because they also pay zero vehicle tax now?
This type of research-free ranting should have no place in good
newspapers.
--
MJR/slef