When I studied in the early nineties I got a full grant for every academic term. I was also entitled to housing payments and had my rent paid. During Summer, we were also classed as unemployed (given the academic term had ended) so we're also entitled to full unemployment benefit while seeking work.
There was plenty of work too and the factories were thriving.
Now let's see how the wonderful, working man's party compares:
Under Labour you don't get any housing allowance if you study (as Cherie Blair did under the Tories). Neither do you get unemployment benefits if you seek work. Neither do you even get a grant.
But I forget since all of that is going to change: Blair wants to fully fund all European students who visit the U.K. to do a B.A. course, so people who come from Poland or Romania or wherever will soon have better educational opportunities in the U.K. than the British who were born here. True, Blair claims he'll classify the funding as a loan but anyone who imagines any of this will be paid back is living in Dixie.
Not that I'd mind if there was some kind of exchange-educational program with these countries so people could leave here to study over there.
But, let's be honest about this: Just what are the results of the great Labour Party drive to education? Answer: a huge fall in educational standards since the sixties when education over here was probably ahead of Europe and a massive gap between U.K. and Chinese/Indian graduates.
I'm sorry but nobody is going to convince me that there weren't more opportunities, less crime, more prosperity and higher living standards under the Tories than Labour (a remote elite of ultra liberal bourgeoisie who were cradle-carried through education on Tory policy.
Again, let me stress the fact industry under Labour has suffered a massive decline. Rolls Royce is gone, Rover is on its proverbial knees, the ceramics industry has failed to compete with overseas competition and crime has risen in all major cities since Labour got in.
I'm not fooled by any of them. Blair is a glib, smooth-talking lawyer who never did a proper day's work in his life, Prescott has a house full of servants who wait on him hand and foot and Blunkett is the most illiberal, anti-democratic politician I can recall since the dark ages.
darkboong said:
The vast majority of Manufacturing died during the Tory reign of Terror. Margaret Thatcher specifically aimed at moving the economy from Blue Collar to White Collar work. She succeeded too. Labour didn't have to do a thing to manufacturing, in fact under Labour there appears to have been a bit of a resurgence.
That screw-up was inherited by Labour from the Tories. The Grant system was axed to the point of futility, and the Loan system introduced under the Tories. I know, I was amongst the first batch of students to go through that regime. The thing that isn't widely known is that the number of students who actually received any grant at all shrank that year too. In addition to receiving no grant, I had to pay (admittedly subsidised) tuition fees. I might even still have the receipts and the "Sorry you are unlucky" letter if you like. That was not a result of means testing, I had very little savings (<1K) and my mother was earning <12K at the time.
The Conservatives were quite definitely in power at the time. I remember cursing Howard's smug face everytime he pointificated about his education reforms and how we were somehow sitting easier exams than he did. ******** of course, because I actually checked out past papers going back over two decades. I didn't have any other past papers to sit because I was one of the first students to sit the GCSEs (another Conservative innovation).
You might have had a doss under the Tories, but I can asure you they really put the boot in the late 80s and early 90s.