J
jake
Guest
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:48:33 GMT, [email protected] (David
Wright) wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>jake <[email protected]> wrote:
>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:51:21 GMT, [email protected] (David
>>Wright) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>>F Troop <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"David Wright" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>> F Troop <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> You have been able to cite no studies. All you do is make
>>>>> assertions. Since I have no reason to accept your assertions,
>>>>> nothing you've said is at all convincing.
>>>>
>>>>You got any empirical data suggests the compliance rate amongst
>>>>psychiatric populations is *higher* than the compliants rate of
>>>>persons with physiological disorders?
>>>
>>>I'll go you one better and ask: Do you have any empirical data at
>>>all?
>>
>>you are crossposting to a support group David.. not a university
>>seminar..
>>perhaps the number of academics and professionals who have the loudest
>>voices has misled you..
>
>Actually, I was capable of noticing that, thanks, but since I don't
>read it regularly, I have no idea what the standard of discussion
>is. Is it that we should all just be able to make assertions we can't
>back up, or what? (I'm not referring to you, but since you're
>objecting to my posting -- I think -- I'm asking.)
Its not for me to object to anyone posting..
I leave the control freakery to others.........
there is a history on ASAD of intellectual bullying and brow
beating...
Its not a sci group..people should be free to express their opinions
as per your wonderful sig
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Wright) wrote:
>In article <[email protected]>,
>jake <[email protected]> wrote:
>>On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:51:21 GMT, [email protected] (David
>>Wright) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>>F Troop <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"David Wright" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>> F Troop <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> You have been able to cite no studies. All you do is make
>>>>> assertions. Since I have no reason to accept your assertions,
>>>>> nothing you've said is at all convincing.
>>>>
>>>>You got any empirical data suggests the compliance rate amongst
>>>>psychiatric populations is *higher* than the compliants rate of
>>>>persons with physiological disorders?
>>>
>>>I'll go you one better and ask: Do you have any empirical data at
>>>all?
>>
>>you are crossposting to a support group David.. not a university
>>seminar..
>>perhaps the number of academics and professionals who have the loudest
>>voices has misled you..
>
>Actually, I was capable of noticing that, thanks, but since I don't
>read it regularly, I have no idea what the standard of discussion
>is. Is it that we should all just be able to make assertions we can't
>back up, or what? (I'm not referring to you, but since you're
>objecting to my posting -- I think -- I'm asking.)
Its not for me to object to anyone posting..
I leave the control freakery to others.........
there is a history on ASAD of intellectual bullying and brow
beating...
Its not a sci group..people should be free to express their opinions
as per your wonderful sig
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)