But you could also say that about fairness in a better training staff and training equipment. More wind tunnel testing, better support staff (Mech's, masseuse, cooks etc.). A better funded team will usually have an advantage over a second tier team including doping. Not that I am for doping. But I wonder, Have we reached or are reaching human physical limits?? Will the public still be interesting if fewer records are broken? What is next? Genetic Engineering?Flyer said:That may be partially true. But because the drugs & synthetic hormones affect on human chemistry, dosage, frequencies, and access are not disclosed to the public---or even amongst the riders---it is still unfair. Some athletes may just be better doped whereas others might be stronger---if everyone were clean.
Maybe it is the winner--who had the most powerful drug---not available to the 2nd place finisher, or maybe it is the doctor's advice on dosages/frequencies that gave the winning edge?
It is unfortunate that athletic contests are now testing chemistry every bit as much as equipment, work ethic and natural genetics.
It is an "arms race" in the peloton--and while many of the drugs are well know and are widely available to all, some drugs are not. Research experimental drugs may only be offered to certain famous riders or infamous doctors.
That would both unfair and unethical.
In other words, we do not know who is the true winner, because powerful drugs, dosages and methods are keep secret from the fans, each rider, and from the drug companies too. And as long as doping is denied or kept secret---a potential for competitive advantage is a possibility.
It is all top secret.
I enjoy watching the Tours but do not take them at heart. This is television, entertaiment. But when I ride, it's a different thing, that is my reality....and that my friend is what matters to me. So let them dope all they want, It will not affect the outcome of any of MY RIDES.