Mountain Biking Humor



On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:02:09 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
<[email protected]> wrote:

..On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:49:54 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]>
..wrote:
..
..>.What I said was that it would hardly be surprising if you were, given
..>.your obvious delight in the deaths of members of your chosen hate
..>.group,
..
..>Anyone who loves nature is happy when an environmental rapist like you gets
..>punished, even by your own actions!
..
..As any regular will be aware, the above constitutes a death threat by
..Vandeman criteria
..
..Yet more evidence that Vandeman is a "typical mountain biker"! Yes,
..he has ridden a mountain bike, he lies, and he makes death threats.
.."Typical mountain biker" all right!
..
..
..Guy

Yawn.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:02:09 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
<[email protected]> wrote:

..On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:49:54 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]>
..wrote:
..
..>.What I said was that it would hardly be surprising if you were, given
..>.your obvious delight in the deaths of members of your chosen hate
..>.group,
..
..>Anyone who loves nature is happy when an environmental rapist like you gets
..>punished, even by your own actions!
..
..As any regular will be aware, the above constitutes a death threat by
..Vandeman criteria
..
..Yet more evidence that Vandeman is a "typical mountain biker"! Yes,
..he has ridden a mountain bike, he lies, and he makes death threats.
.."Typical mountain biker" all right!
..
..
..Guy

Yawn.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:02:09 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
<[email protected]> wrote:

..On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:49:54 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]>
..wrote:
..
..>.What I said was that it would hardly be surprising if you were, given
..>.your obvious delight in the deaths of members of your chosen hate
..>.group,
..
..>Anyone who loves nature is happy when an environmental rapist like you gets
..>punished, even by your own actions!
..
..As any regular will be aware, the above constitutes a death threat by
..Vandeman criteria
..
..Yet more evidence that Vandeman is a "typical mountain biker"! Yes,
..he has ridden a mountain bike, he lies, and he makes death threats.
.."Typical mountain biker" all right!
..
..
..Guy

Yawn.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
The fact that you "claim" to never lie is a lie.

You throw out the most outrageous lies of anybody here. Just recently, you
posted a story with a title that suggested a woman was killed BECAUSE she
rides a mountain bike, the story was clear that her bike was not part of the
story, but it was a means of identifying her to the community.

Youi could have posted, naked woman killed by bear, and we'd all want to
know what a naked woman was doing outside -- assuming the bear didn't get
her indoors. But the story would have clarified that the woman is only naked
in the shower, but that she was hikng with friends when they crossed paths
with the bear. The title that the bear had killed a naked woman, or that a
bear killed a mountain biker, is a blatant lie.

Your denial is also a lie.
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
 
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:07:14 +1200, Westie <[email protected]> wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote:
..
..> .Might as well laugh it up - he's completely harmless.
..>
..> If you really believed that, you wouldn't bother to talk about it. The fact is,
..> you guys are TERRIFIED that people will believe me (or look for themselves), and
..> see the obvious.
..
..I think that it's the other way around. You are the one that is
..terrified of people believing me if I go to one of your wacky
.."conferences". They'd probably see the obvious - that you are even more
..whacked out than they are.
..If you're not terrified, I'll take that as a personal invitation to one
..of your conferences. So when and where is the next one?

Your threat is duly noted.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande