S
S Curtiss
Guest
"Edward Dolan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>> Such as our explanation for responding to Vandy's lies and misinformation
>> considering access, trails, conservation and off-road cycling?
>> Apparently, it is you who can not grasp the "explanation". My (and
>> others') posts to Vandy are in direct response to his attacks on an
>> activity that we enjoy and his posts also attempt to close all
>> communication beyond his narrow views on the topic. We only want to keep
>> that communication open for real information and cooperation to grow the
>> movement to protect areas, rather than have them paved over.
>
> You do not have to keep doing it over and over ad infinitum. When you do
> so you make yourself out as nothing but a stalker. Get your own posts
> going on what you want and let Vandeman occasionally have the opportunity
> of responding to you. How the hell can you be so unfair all the time? Are
> you even an American? We Americans pride ourselves on our sense of fair
> play.
Why not lead by example...? You haven't done anything but extend this thread
to see your own words.
From e. dolan on another thread: "Usenet is strictly for idiots, assholes
and jerks - positively no exceptions! When I am on Usenet I try to be the
biggest idiot, asshole and jerk of them all. I set the standard for one and
all. I believe I can state with absolute assurance that I am the Greatest
Idiot, the Greatest Asshole and the Greatest Jerk that Usenet has ever known
in its' long and dishonored history. For Christ's sakes, I prove it every
time I post. Can't any of you poor bastards read?"
The same argument all over several threads... ? So doley can see his own
words? So he can try to convince nobody he is some kind of moderator?
This thread has died. Since "Impotence" best describes doley's presence,
that is where I'll be responding
>
> Vandeman can attack all he wants to and it is not your business to
> regurgitate your boilerplate responses to his every utterance. Try not to
> be nothing but a negative echo to him. You are too intelligent for that.
> Get your own agenda and forget about him. I will read your messages and
> perhaps even post some original ones of my own. RBS is being ruined by
> your rote responses. No one else seems to be on this newsgroup (RBS)
> except for a handful. Why is that when this should be the most
> invigorating of all the newsgroups connected with cycling?
If you want to discuss outdoor access on point, then do so. Crying "foul"
because you got stepped on clinging to Vandy's opinions is not my concern.
Dead thread. See "Impotence"..
>
> RBM is just chock full of idiots and I only go there to stir the pot. RBS
> should be the heart and soul of cycling and yet it is the deadest of all
> the cycling groups. Do you not feel any responsibility for this? I would
> like to see RBS flourish with lots of intellectual stimulation concerning
> the world of cycling. But how can that be when all anyone sees is yours
> and Vandeman's posts forever on a single subject? Try not to be so crazy
> all the time!
>
> I repeat, it is not necessary that you respond to Vandeman's every
> utterance. In fact, it is insane for you to do this. No one else does this
> kind of crazy nonsense except you. Stop with the scotch whiskey and get
> focused on other things in life.
See... you keep comparing me to you. Your tactics of conversation turned
around. And it takes the mental capacity of chewed gum to do it!
This thread is dead. Like playing ping-pong with a wall...
Since your posts have no consequence, I'll just keep it in the "Impotence"
thread.
news:[email protected]...
>
>> Such as our explanation for responding to Vandy's lies and misinformation
>> considering access, trails, conservation and off-road cycling?
>> Apparently, it is you who can not grasp the "explanation". My (and
>> others') posts to Vandy are in direct response to his attacks on an
>> activity that we enjoy and his posts also attempt to close all
>> communication beyond his narrow views on the topic. We only want to keep
>> that communication open for real information and cooperation to grow the
>> movement to protect areas, rather than have them paved over.
>
> You do not have to keep doing it over and over ad infinitum. When you do
> so you make yourself out as nothing but a stalker. Get your own posts
> going on what you want and let Vandeman occasionally have the opportunity
> of responding to you. How the hell can you be so unfair all the time? Are
> you even an American? We Americans pride ourselves on our sense of fair
> play.
Why not lead by example...? You haven't done anything but extend this thread
to see your own words.
From e. dolan on another thread: "Usenet is strictly for idiots, assholes
and jerks - positively no exceptions! When I am on Usenet I try to be the
biggest idiot, asshole and jerk of them all. I set the standard for one and
all. I believe I can state with absolute assurance that I am the Greatest
Idiot, the Greatest Asshole and the Greatest Jerk that Usenet has ever known
in its' long and dishonored history. For Christ's sakes, I prove it every
time I post. Can't any of you poor bastards read?"
The same argument all over several threads... ? So doley can see his own
words? So he can try to convince nobody he is some kind of moderator?
This thread has died. Since "Impotence" best describes doley's presence,
that is where I'll be responding
>
> Vandeman can attack all he wants to and it is not your business to
> regurgitate your boilerplate responses to his every utterance. Try not to
> be nothing but a negative echo to him. You are too intelligent for that.
> Get your own agenda and forget about him. I will read your messages and
> perhaps even post some original ones of my own. RBS is being ruined by
> your rote responses. No one else seems to be on this newsgroup (RBS)
> except for a handful. Why is that when this should be the most
> invigorating of all the newsgroups connected with cycling?
If you want to discuss outdoor access on point, then do so. Crying "foul"
because you got stepped on clinging to Vandy's opinions is not my concern.
Dead thread. See "Impotence"..
>
> RBM is just chock full of idiots and I only go there to stir the pot. RBS
> should be the heart and soul of cycling and yet it is the deadest of all
> the cycling groups. Do you not feel any responsibility for this? I would
> like to see RBS flourish with lots of intellectual stimulation concerning
> the world of cycling. But how can that be when all anyone sees is yours
> and Vandeman's posts forever on a single subject? Try not to be so crazy
> all the time!
>
> I repeat, it is not necessary that you respond to Vandeman's every
> utterance. In fact, it is insane for you to do this. No one else does this
> kind of crazy nonsense except you. Stop with the scotch whiskey and get
> focused on other things in life.
See... you keep comparing me to you. Your tactics of conversation turned
around. And it takes the mental capacity of chewed gum to do it!
This thread is dead. Like playing ping-pong with a wall...
Since your posts have no consequence, I'll just keep it in the "Impotence"
thread.
