E
Edward Dolan
Guest
"Vincent Stadelmann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 2006-04-20 05:40:04 +0200, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> said:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:29:56 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:15:54 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, we have given several reasons. Several times. However, since
>>>>> you
>>>>> insist on your own definitions and opinions being the only ones, you
>>>>> are
>>>>> closed to sensible solutions and cooperative efforts to save habitat
>>>>> for
>>>>> everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Still waiting to hear even ONE good reason to allow bikes off-road,
>>>> after 12 years. If you could have come up with one, you already would
>>>> have.
>>>> ===
>>> This has been stated many times and in many ways:
>>> Cycling off-road is an excellent physical and mental exercise, allows
>>> the rider to enjoy this exercise without the constraints and dangers of
>>> being in auto traffic, allows the rider to enjoy the natural
>>> environment, and develop an appreciation for the natural environment.
[...]
You can do all of the above and get all those benefits on back country roads
and specially constructed bike trails. You do not ever need to be on
footpaths anywhere in this country since we have roads of all descriptions
going every which way. It may be that you would have to be on a footpath in
a third world nation if there were no roads, but that is the only excuse I
can think of. Even there, it would be politeness to get off your bike and to
walk it so as not to offend everyone in sight.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
news:[email protected]...
> On 2006-04-20 05:40:04 +0200, Mike Vandeman <[email protected]> said:
>
>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:29:56 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Mike Vandeman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:15:54 -0400, "S Curtiss" <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, we have given several reasons. Several times. However, since
>>>>> you
>>>>> insist on your own definitions and opinions being the only ones, you
>>>>> are
>>>>> closed to sensible solutions and cooperative efforts to save habitat
>>>>> for
>>>>> everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Still waiting to hear even ONE good reason to allow bikes off-road,
>>>> after 12 years. If you could have come up with one, you already would
>>>> have.
>>>> ===
>>> This has been stated many times and in many ways:
>>> Cycling off-road is an excellent physical and mental exercise, allows
>>> the rider to enjoy this exercise without the constraints and dangers of
>>> being in auto traffic, allows the rider to enjoy the natural
>>> environment, and develop an appreciation for the natural environment.
[...]
You can do all of the above and get all those benefits on back country roads
and specially constructed bike trails. You do not ever need to be on
footpaths anywhere in this country since we have roads of all descriptions
going every which way. It may be that you would have to be on a footpath in
a third world nation if there were no roads, but that is the only excuse I
can think of. Even there, it would be politeness to get off your bike and to
walk it so as not to offend everyone in sight.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota