A.Lee wrote:
>>> A mate has had great success with 'No-Tubes', and has been using it
>>> for 3 years now - he doesnt go easy on his bikes either, he's out
>>> regularly on 6hr/marathon races.
So he hasn't had one single puncture or failure in 3 years? What kind of
tyres? What kind of roads or surfaces? Anywhere where there is much
debris/glass/thorns?
>>> http://www.numplumz.com/Reviews/stans/Stansnotubes.htm
>>> and here:
>>> http://www.notubes.com/
>
>> thats tubless rather, which is rather differnt to say slime tubes.
>
> Yes, but it is used on 'normal' tyres, and makes them almost puncture
> proof with few drawbacks, apart from the initial purchase price, which
> you'll get back anyway by saving on new inner tubes/patches, as well
> as the sheer time saving of having no punctures to deal with.
> Alan.
Do you ever have to top up with more sealant? If so, that will be more
expensive than a lifetime's supply of patches.
These two drawbacks mentioned in the review above seem quite serious:
"Messy and needs patience and a compressed air source to set up
initially"
"Some tyres will refuse to mount" [meaning your choice of tyres is
restricted]
I can understand how they would be useful for the kinds of mountain biking
where you need to use very low pressure, but for normal road cycling, pinch
flats aren't an issue when using normal pressure, and the weight saving
would be negligable as inner tubes can weigh less than 75 grams. So that
just leaves puncture sealing. I can't believe any liquid sealant can work
well with anything more than the tiniest of punctures unless there's an
awful lot of it in the tyre.
~PB