David Hansen <
[email protected]> of wrote:
>On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:41:46 +0000 someone who may be Steph
>Peters <
[email protected]> wrote this:-
>
>>He can't be, because he's wrong about the skirts.
>>Fairly long and loose is bad, because they flap all
>>over the place.
>
>On a diamond framed bike it would drape over the tube
>without flapping around too much. I accept that I was wrong
>to type "very loose" and blame that on it being too early
>for my brain to be working properly.
I have worn a long flappy skirt on a diamond frame bike, and
mine did not drape nicely over the tube. Instead it flapped
around all over the place, until the wind caught it and blew
it upwards, exposing my stockings and suspenders to the
world at large. Even though I was a penniless student at the
time, I thereupon resolved never again to wear an evening
dress while cycling.
>There is still the problem of getting on and off the bike.
>At a time when the mass media is full of a car designed by
>women I'm not convinced that the diamond frame design is
>the best in many circumstances.
>
>It's not just a female issue either, I much prefer designs
>that it is easy to get on and off.
Well so do I, but I've never found it a problem on a
diamond frame. I've got a mixte frame which I could step
through, but find that I'm too used to doing a leg over the
rear wheel mount/dismount. Last week I had a set of shelves
in the pannier that stuck out of the pannier by about 2
feet vertically. So I had to mount the bike by stepping
through, and found that I didn't have the knack of how to
hold it so the bike wobbled all over the place. Give me a
diamond frame any day.
--
The standard of intellect in politics is so low, men of moderate mental capacity
have to stoop to reach it. - Hillaire Belloc
Steph Peters delete invalid from
[email protected]
Tatting, lace & stitching page <
http://www.sandbenders.demon.co.uk/index.htm