P
psycho
Guest
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:10:22 -0000, "XpUser" <[email protected]> wrote:
>You have to ask yourself, how comes the only site you can find that backs your story is an Israeli
>site. Do you not think that the Israelis are bound to come out with this. Do you not think l need
>to find some evidence from an independent source. How stupid are you to believe this, when your
>only source is an Israeli source. Do you not think for one minute, the Israelis are
>anti-Palestinian, the only site l can find is from an Israeli. Therefore the things that l read on
>their site, may just be prejudiced and biased?? Obviously you do not. The average person would.
I will agree with you that an Israeli propaganda site is not the place to find anything positive
to do with Palestinians. You haven't given anything better than propaganda sites for any of your
posts either.
>The fact that there is video footage (that l did not not watch), does not mean anything. you not
>heard of staged shoots? if you believe everything that
The video clips left more questions open than they answered. Audio was horrible so you have to take
the word of whoever did the subtitles, probably an Israeli media person, to do the translation.
Needless to say, that doesn't give much credit to the video.
>this should not apply to you, WHY????. This is the kind of arrogance l expect from Zionists. A case
>of one rule for them and another one for us.
If you've been following closely of late, it appears that a certain Jewish member of this discussion
has pretty much said it's OK for Israel to kill so long as it's to protect their people. Doesn't
seem to think it works both ways though.
>You should give up, you know when you have lost a discussion. You cant even back up your claims. I
>have never said the Israelis are totally to blame. Yet you claim l have. This is another typical
>Zionist approach attribute statements X, Y and Z to somebody. Instead of trying to win a discussion
>by common sense and proof, you try to win it by assigning ridiculous statements to me. Grow up.
This statement may be directed at the wrong person. Not sure who you're directing it at in this
particular response but there has been quite a bit of denying statements lately.
>Saying "Well done you are truly representative of your people" no doubt you got this from your
>zionist "what to saying when losing a discussion" handbook
Not sure why you insist on refering to everything as Zionist but, to each his own. This has seemed
to be the way that certain people deal with losing ground in a discussion. Name calling and insults.
Once again, not too sure who you directed the comment at.
>You still refuse to answer the question Why do the Israelis offer subsidies, to Israelis living
>outside Israel, to settle in the occupied territories.
This is an answer you'll be waiting for when you die. They don't have an answer and they don't care.
>You made no comment on Ariel Sharon being found by his parliament on being personally responsible
>for the deaths of over 800 Palestinians, apart from "l refer you to Jerrys answer". Jerry is an
>idiot that cant even hold a discussion. See my earlier encounter with this idiot in this thread. He
>starts of his reply with "Sharon's negligence allowed..." thus proving and agreeing with my point,
>Sharon was at fault, for the slaughter of 800 innocent men, women and children. MORE LIVES THAN the
>total number of victims claimed by ALL the suicide bombers this year.. He is an evil man, who runs
>the Israeli government.
How do you figure Sharon was at fault? Did he send people to kill these people? Knowing that
something is going on and not stopping it doesn't make you responsible in this situation. Why would
you defend your enemy when they're just going to turn around and kill your people??? Yes, he's evil,
just like Arafat.
>You have to ask yourself, how comes the only site you can find that backs your story is an Israeli
>site. Do you not think that the Israelis are bound to come out with this. Do you not think l need
>to find some evidence from an independent source. How stupid are you to believe this, when your
>only source is an Israeli source. Do you not think for one minute, the Israelis are
>anti-Palestinian, the only site l can find is from an Israeli. Therefore the things that l read on
>their site, may just be prejudiced and biased?? Obviously you do not. The average person would.
I will agree with you that an Israeli propaganda site is not the place to find anything positive
to do with Palestinians. You haven't given anything better than propaganda sites for any of your
posts either.
>The fact that there is video footage (that l did not not watch), does not mean anything. you not
>heard of staged shoots? if you believe everything that
The video clips left more questions open than they answered. Audio was horrible so you have to take
the word of whoever did the subtitles, probably an Israeli media person, to do the translation.
Needless to say, that doesn't give much credit to the video.
>this should not apply to you, WHY????. This is the kind of arrogance l expect from Zionists. A case
>of one rule for them and another one for us.
If you've been following closely of late, it appears that a certain Jewish member of this discussion
has pretty much said it's OK for Israel to kill so long as it's to protect their people. Doesn't
seem to think it works both ways though.
>You should give up, you know when you have lost a discussion. You cant even back up your claims. I
>have never said the Israelis are totally to blame. Yet you claim l have. This is another typical
>Zionist approach attribute statements X, Y and Z to somebody. Instead of trying to win a discussion
>by common sense and proof, you try to win it by assigning ridiculous statements to me. Grow up.
This statement may be directed at the wrong person. Not sure who you're directing it at in this
particular response but there has been quite a bit of denying statements lately.
>Saying "Well done you are truly representative of your people" no doubt you got this from your
>zionist "what to saying when losing a discussion" handbook
Not sure why you insist on refering to everything as Zionist but, to each his own. This has seemed
to be the way that certain people deal with losing ground in a discussion. Name calling and insults.
Once again, not too sure who you directed the comment at.
>You still refuse to answer the question Why do the Israelis offer subsidies, to Israelis living
>outside Israel, to settle in the occupied territories.
This is an answer you'll be waiting for when you die. They don't have an answer and they don't care.
>You made no comment on Ariel Sharon being found by his parliament on being personally responsible
>for the deaths of over 800 Palestinians, apart from "l refer you to Jerrys answer". Jerry is an
>idiot that cant even hold a discussion. See my earlier encounter with this idiot in this thread. He
>starts of his reply with "Sharon's negligence allowed..." thus proving and agreeing with my point,
>Sharon was at fault, for the slaughter of 800 innocent men, women and children. MORE LIVES THAN the
>total number of victims claimed by ALL the suicide bombers this year.. He is an evil man, who runs
>the Israeli government.
How do you figure Sharon was at fault? Did he send people to kill these people? Knowing that
something is going on and not stopping it doesn't make you responsible in this situation. Why would
you defend your enemy when they're just going to turn around and kill your people??? Yes, he's evil,
just like Arafat.