D
Dave Stocker
Guest
Puts on flame retardant suit.
So after all of the URT bashing in the Giant Warp thread, I was wondering what everyone's beef is
with URT anyway. It is a design with advantages and disadvantages, just like any other suspension
design. It seemed to be a fad a few years ago to build URT designs (Trek Y-bikes, Klein Mantra, etc)
and that it has fallen out of favor because it did not deliver on it's hype. At one time URT was
considered a great thing ( http://www.cycletech.com/TechTips/body.htm and look at the bottom). Now
is seems to be hated. In a recent Velo News article, the author seems to sneer at somebody he meets
on the trail because that rider liked his URT bike.
http://www.velonews.com/tech/report/articles/4082.0.html So the mags say it is fashionable to hate
URT, but a few years ago they were touting it. Does it really suck that bad?
From googling a bit, I can say that the generally accepted behavior traits of the URT are:
- It is immune to bob on out of saddle sprints. <good>
- Supposedly they bob (especially low pivot designs) <bad>
- It has no pedal kickback. <good>
- Prone to brake jack <bad>
- BB-seat distance varies <bad>
- Only active if rider remains seated (rider stands on swing arm when out of saddle) <bad?>
I have a mid-90's Katraga Proto Winner in my garage that I have logged a lot of miles on. FYI, a
little background- Katarga is an Austrian bike maker that I would not call boutique. They are a
small maker of low to mid end bikes, inhabiting the same ecological niche as e.g. GT. The Proto
Winner was a URT design that they sold in the mid to late 90's. It is not a high pivot design like
the Mantra. The BB sits about 2" directly behind the pivot. If you are interested in what it looks
like, I could photograph it, but I do not have a web page at the moment to post it to.
From my experience on this bike I can report:
- It does bob a little bit if you pedal very badly, but bob is easy to completely eliminate with a
seated spin (easier than with 4-bar). I do not know where the low pivot URT bikes developed the
reputation for bobbing. It really does behave like a hardtail on out of saddle sprints. On steep
climbs this is a good thing or a bad thing, depending on your perspective. I tend to pull hard on
the upstroke and climb better on a more "conventional" FS design than on a URT.
- Never experienced pedal kickback. Hell, I could run this bike as an SS.
- Brake Jack. I hate that term. This bike has a low pivot and this is not really an issue. I have
heard that it can be quite severe on a high pivot bike.
- BB-Seat distance only varies by about a half an inch at full travel on this bike. No biggie.
- The not active part I can attest to. I recently bought a four bar bike and now the old URT bikes
seems quite harsh and inactive. It is still taking the edge off of hits. In this respect, it
behaves a bit like a heavy (13kg) Giant NRS.
There is no suspension design that is the Holy Grail. Path Analysis makes interesting reading if you
have the proper background: http://www.mtbcomprador.com/pa/english/ IMHO- URT does quite well in a
couple of applications:
1) The lightest FS frames are single pivot. URT is basically single pivot with the BB on the rear
triangle. It follows that a URT frame could make it into the 4lb range. One good application
would be XC marathon bike where big travel was not an issue and the suspension is mostly there to
take the edge off and delay the onset of fatigue. The NRS works this way. My old low pivot URT
bike is too heavy to be considered for racing, but it is great on epic rides. Too bad URT is
unfashionable. It could in principle be used for a great XC marathon bike.
2) Touring bikes and Walgooses. Wallgoose buyers want the FS look and tourers want to take the edge
off, but both are ridden by people who probably have never (and never will) practiced a clean
spin. I do not buy the "URT bobs like crazy" line. The FSR bobs like crazy if I do not spin
smoothly. The URT bike is very forgiving.
In short, it URT has shortcomings, but the vilification of URT has more to do with fashion than
anything else. Remenber, the macstrut is making a comback.
Runs for cover.
-Dave
So after all of the URT bashing in the Giant Warp thread, I was wondering what everyone's beef is
with URT anyway. It is a design with advantages and disadvantages, just like any other suspension
design. It seemed to be a fad a few years ago to build URT designs (Trek Y-bikes, Klein Mantra, etc)
and that it has fallen out of favor because it did not deliver on it's hype. At one time URT was
considered a great thing ( http://www.cycletech.com/TechTips/body.htm and look at the bottom). Now
is seems to be hated. In a recent Velo News article, the author seems to sneer at somebody he meets
on the trail because that rider liked his URT bike.
http://www.velonews.com/tech/report/articles/4082.0.html So the mags say it is fashionable to hate
URT, but a few years ago they were touting it. Does it really suck that bad?
From googling a bit, I can say that the generally accepted behavior traits of the URT are:
- It is immune to bob on out of saddle sprints. <good>
- Supposedly they bob (especially low pivot designs) <bad>
- It has no pedal kickback. <good>
- Prone to brake jack <bad>
- BB-seat distance varies <bad>
- Only active if rider remains seated (rider stands on swing arm when out of saddle) <bad?>
I have a mid-90's Katraga Proto Winner in my garage that I have logged a lot of miles on. FYI, a
little background- Katarga is an Austrian bike maker that I would not call boutique. They are a
small maker of low to mid end bikes, inhabiting the same ecological niche as e.g. GT. The Proto
Winner was a URT design that they sold in the mid to late 90's. It is not a high pivot design like
the Mantra. The BB sits about 2" directly behind the pivot. If you are interested in what it looks
like, I could photograph it, but I do not have a web page at the moment to post it to.
From my experience on this bike I can report:
- It does bob a little bit if you pedal very badly, but bob is easy to completely eliminate with a
seated spin (easier than with 4-bar). I do not know where the low pivot URT bikes developed the
reputation for bobbing. It really does behave like a hardtail on out of saddle sprints. On steep
climbs this is a good thing or a bad thing, depending on your perspective. I tend to pull hard on
the upstroke and climb better on a more "conventional" FS design than on a URT.
- Never experienced pedal kickback. Hell, I could run this bike as an SS.
- Brake Jack. I hate that term. This bike has a low pivot and this is not really an issue. I have
heard that it can be quite severe on a high pivot bike.
- BB-Seat distance only varies by about a half an inch at full travel on this bike. No biggie.
- The not active part I can attest to. I recently bought a four bar bike and now the old URT bikes
seems quite harsh and inactive. It is still taking the edge off of hits. In this respect, it
behaves a bit like a heavy (13kg) Giant NRS.
There is no suspension design that is the Holy Grail. Path Analysis makes interesting reading if you
have the proper background: http://www.mtbcomprador.com/pa/english/ IMHO- URT does quite well in a
couple of applications:
1) The lightest FS frames are single pivot. URT is basically single pivot with the BB on the rear
triangle. It follows that a URT frame could make it into the 4lb range. One good application
would be XC marathon bike where big travel was not an issue and the suspension is mostly there to
take the edge off and delay the onset of fatigue. The NRS works this way. My old low pivot URT
bike is too heavy to be considered for racing, but it is great on epic rides. Too bad URT is
unfashionable. It could in principle be used for a great XC marathon bike.
2) Touring bikes and Walgooses. Wallgoose buyers want the FS look and tourers want to take the edge
off, but both are ridden by people who probably have never (and never will) practiced a clean
spin. I do not buy the "URT bobs like crazy" line. The FSR bobs like crazy if I do not spin
smoothly. The URT bike is very forgiving.
In short, it URT has shortcomings, but the vilification of URT has more to do with fashion than
anything else. Remenber, the macstrut is making a comback.
Runs for cover.
-Dave