Originally Posted by 531Aussie .
Hee hee. Apparently ESPN have been using this stock "Armstrong" photo today
He looks like he has strong arms.
Originally Posted by 531Aussie .
Hee hee. Apparently ESPN have been using this stock "Armstrong" photo today
Wasn't he one of the guys implicated in OperationOriginally Posted by matagi .
3?
Must have been doping
The issue is, specifically with Lance, what stuff?Originally Posted by matagi .
Personally, I'm with Monsieur Hinault on this one - it should have been dealt with way back.
So no names, dates or events...The ongoing [COLOR= rgb(0, 102, 204)]Lance Armstrong doping case[/COLOR] experienced further delays on Friday when U.S District Court Judge Sam Sparks gave both parties; Armstrong and USADA, a further seven days to deliver additional information. Among the possible outcomes expected from Sparks in a week’s time include dismissing the [COLOR= rgb(0, 102, 204)]Armstrong’s lawsuit against USADA[/COLOR] or an injunction against USADA that will cease the case against the seven-time Tour winner.
Sparks’ concerns and subsequently delayed ruling on [COLOR= rgb(0, 102, 204)]jurisdiction[/COLOR] were primarily based around the specifics provided by USADA, or rather apparent lack of which did not provide Armstrong with enough information to mount an edequate defence.
"I couldn't find anything but conclusions (in the charges)," Sparks said. "Not one name, not one event, not one date,†said Sparks.
Ok, here is an overview.
Armstrong did not to contest a hearing, that doesn’t mean there won’t be a report about his case.
http://www.usada.org/files/pdfs/usada-protocol.pdf
“USADA shall publicly report the disposition of anti-doping matters no later than five business days after … (2) such hearing has been waived.â€
Additionally “After an anti-doping rule violation has been established, USADA may comment upon any aspect of the case.â€
They need to give this report, with instructions, to the UCI. The UCI then has a "Choice" to follow the instructions of USADA or to take it to CAS. I doubt they would take it to CAS as they would lose quickly. CAS does have a process in place to review and rule on cases rapidly, this would surely qualify.
I expect the UCI to strip Armstrong of all results from Aug 1998 till today. Armstrong has threaten to sue USADA if he is stripped....but who does he sue? It is actually the UCI that would do the stripping so perhaps he files a lawsuit against Travis?
So USADA can release all the evidence they like, the question is how and when. For now Bruyneel, Marti, and Celya all are facing arbitration, this may effect when USADA releases the evidence. They may also just dump it all into the public at the same time they give it to them.
I understand that Armstrong was on the phone with Bruyneel yesterday trying to get him to drop the arbitration. Johan has a lot more to lose as he will be unemployable if he is sanctioned. He does not have the cash that Wonderboy has.
Another interesting element will be how the public reacts in 4 months
Tyler's book is coming out at just the right time. Coyle is an excellent writer and it will be a compelling story. It will get significant coverage in both the mainstream and cycling media
Over the next few weeks much of USADA's case will be know and it will not be pretty. There will be very clear evidence of a cover up by the UCI. Not just of the 2001 ToS but also the 1999 Cortisone positive. It should also expose the actions by the UCI to try to insure the truth did not get out to USADA or the Feds. I also expect USAC to not be spared. The question is outlet for this info. It could be outside of any detailed report it gives to the media or UCI.
Multiple entities will launch lawsuits as soon as he is stripped. SCA is the most obvious but I expect sponsors to as well.
By the time any arbitration comes around for Bruyneel, Marti, and Celya the public will be well aware of what USADA is....even these goofy baseball writers who have been babbling about Lance all day.
And then there are the Federal cases.....save the best for last
i love youOriginally Posted by stevebaby .
http://i.minus.com/iXuhZlo2ubfl0.jpg
1961,,RAAF School in Penang.
My sister is the one in the bottom right hand corner...checking out the other girls and ignoring the camera.
She died 5 weeks ago. I miss the mad thing heaps.
Couldn't find any of my old school photos online, something for which I am very grateful, even though I modestly admit to being an awesome kid.
I see the onesie is enjoying a resurgence in popularity.Originally Posted by VadarStrikesBack .
People should relax. The sport is in safe hands. We have people in the industry working very hard to develop new products we all desperately need.
http://www.pbkblog.com/eurobike-2012-preview/2012/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pbkblog%2FZUNy+%28PBK+BLOG%29
Shame. Way too young, obviously.Originally Posted by stevebaby .
1961,,RAAF School in Penang.
My sister is the one in the bottom right hand corner...checking out the other girls and ignoring the camera.
She died 5 weeks ago. I miss the mad thing heaps.
Couldn't find any of my old school photos online, something for which I am very grateful, even though I modestly admit to being an awesome kid.
As far as I understand most of the evidence will come out. And everyone will get to see that there was plenty of hard evidence and the whole 'witch hunt' theory is just another well played Livestrong PR strategy.Originally Posted by swampy1970 .
Nice write up Jono but if the US District judge that looked at the "evidence" from USADA said there were no names, no specific events, no dates and wouldn't stand muster in even a basic court room, which is scarier: the prospect for any athlete that a fair trial isn't a necessarily a requirement or a chap (Lance in this case) losing a few wins? The first one should scare the bejesus out of folks that race given that neither failed tests or hard evidence are seemingly required to ban someone. The latter just needs to end one way or the other. If there's hard evidence - names, dates, records of funds used to procure "stuff and equipment" etc then he should be nailed to a cross and made an example of. Anything other than hard evidence then the whole thing resembles the Spanish Inquisition and opens the way for any head of an organization to go on a witch hunt to further their own careers at the tax payers expense.
I think the only semi good thing here is that such a decision isn't left to one body.
Does the fact that Lance has refused arbitration with the USADA also waived any rights for him to go to arbitration if the UCI upholds the request to ban him?
So much **** has been slung around - this is one of the few times that I think that all the details should be aired in public. Those who are complicit in this shouldn't be allowed to remain anonymous and should be charged accordingly.
I do it for the ladies.Originally Posted by VadarStrikesBack .
Quality rant by lama over on his blog. Love a bit of 'retarded technology' bashing.
Also top 10 in the state open over the weekend - very good ride in a very handy field in A grade.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.